skip to main content
10.1145/1962300.1962334acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding overtaking, beyond limitations of the visual system in making spatiotemporal estimations

Published: 25 August 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Motivation -- To enrich our understanding of the factors that influence the decision to overtake against two way traffic, and this, beyond the limitations of the human visual system in making spatiotemporal estimations. Such understanding may be valuable for the design of future adaptive aid systems.
Research approach -- An explorative naturalistic observation was conducted with a vehicle equipped with three cameras travelling at normal speed for a total distance of 300 km. 40 unobtrusive observations of overtaking episodes were recorded.
Findings/Design -- The data is still at the analysis stage. There is however evidence that before the decision to overtake (i) there is a preparation phase prior to the initiation of the overtaking manoeuvre which deals with the intentions/state of the driver ahead and (ii) frequent users of the particular road will use their specific knowledge and initiate overtaking manoeuvres
Research limitations/Implications -- The study has an explorative character mainly for generating hypotheses and cannot as such prove its findings without subsequent complementary methods.
Originality/Value -- A contribution of the present paper is on the observation method which ensures the collection of data with a high degree of ecological validity.
Take away message -- Spatiotemporal estimation just prior to manoeuvre initiation is only one of the factors influencing the decision to overtake. For understanding naturally occurring overtaking manoeuvres longer time frames of analysis are needed

References

[1]
Bjorkman, M. (1963). An exploratory study of predictive judgments in a traffic situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 65--77.
[2]
Clarke, D.D., Ward, P.J., and Jones, J. (1999). Processes and countermeasures in overtaking road accidents. Ergonomics, 42, 846--867.
[3]
Clarke, D.D., Ward, P.J., and Jones, J. (1998). Overtaking road-accidents: Differences on manoeuvre as a function of driver age. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 455--467.
[4]
Gordon, D.A., and Mast, T.M. (1970). Drivers' judgments in overtaking and passing. Human Factors, 12, 341--346.
[5]
Gray, R., and Regan, D.M. (2005). Perceptual processes used by drivers during overtaking in a driving simulator. Human Factors, 47, 394--417.
[6]
Gray, R., and Regan D. (2000). Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1721--1732.
[7]
Hegeman, G., Tapani, A., and Hoogendoorn, S. (2009). Overtaking assistant assessment using traffic simulation. Transportation Research Part C, 17, 617--630.
[8]
Hegeman, G., Brookhuis, K., and Hoogedoorn (2005). Opportunities of advanced driver assistance systems towards overtaking. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 5, 281--296.
[9]
Hills, B.L. (1980). Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception, 9, 183--216.
[10]
Jones, H.V., and Heimstra, N.W. (1964). Ability of drivers to make critical passing judgments. Journal of Engineering Psychology, 3, 117--122.
[11]
Wilson, T., and Best, W. (1982). Driving strategies in overtaking. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 179--185.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ECCE '10: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
August 2010
380 pages
ISBN:9781605589466
DOI:10.1145/1962300
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • TNO: Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research
  • EACE: European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 August 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. driving
  2. naturalistic observation
  3. overtaking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ECCE '10
Sponsor:
  • TNO
  • EACE
ECCE '10: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
August 25 - 27, 2010
Delft, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media