skip to main content
10.1145/1837934.1837979acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computing the radius of positive semidefiniteness of a multivariate real polynomial via a dual of Seidenberg's method

Published: 25 July 2010 Publication History

Abstract

We give a stability criterion for real polynomial inequalities with floating point or inexact scalars by estimating from below or computing the radius of semidefiniteness. That radius is the maximum deformation of the polynomial coefficient vector measured in a weighted Euclidean vector norm within which the inequality remains true. A large radius means that the inequalities may be considered numerically valid.
The radius of positive (or negative) semidefiniteness is the distance to the nearest polynomial with a real root, which has been thoroughly studied before. We solve this problem by parameterized Lagrangian multipliers and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. Our algorithms can compute the radius for several simultaneous inequalities including possibly additional linear coefficient constraints. Our distance measure is the weighted Euclidean coefficient norm, but we also discuss several formulas for the weighted infinity and 1-norms.
The computation of the nearest polynomial with a real root can be interpreted as a dual of Seidenberg's method that decides if a real hypersurface contains a real point. Sums-of-squares rational lower bound certificates for the radius of semidefiniteness provide a new approach to solving Seidenberg's problem, especially when the coefficients are numeric. They also offer a surprising alternative sum-of-squares proof for those polynomials that themselves cannot be represented by a polynomial sum-of-squares but that have a positive distance to the nearest indefinite polynomial.

References

[1]
Aubry, P., Rouillier, F., and Safey El Din, M. Real solving for positive dimensional systems. J. Symbolic Comput. 34, 6 (Dec. 2002), 543--560. URL: http://www-spiral.lip6.fr/~safey/Articles/RR-3992.ps.gz.
[2]
Becker, E., Powers, V., and Wörmann, T. Deciding positivity of real polynomials. In Real Algebraic Geometry and Ordered Structures, C. N. Delzell and J. J. Madden, Eds., vol. 253 of Contemporary Math. AMS, 2000, pp. 251--272.
[3]
Corless, R. M., Gianni, P. M., Trager, B. M., and Watt, S. M. The singular value decomposition for polynomial systems. In Proc. 1995 Internat. Symp. Symbolic Algebraic Comput. ISSAC'95 (New York, N. Y., 1995), A. H. M. Levelt, Ed., ACM Press, pp. 96--103.
[4]
Corless, R. M., Kaltofen, E., and Watt, S. M. Hybrid methods. In Computer Algebra Handbook, J. Grabmeier, E. Kaltofen, and V. Weispfenning, Eds. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2003, Section 2.12.3, pp. 112--125. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/01/symnum.pdf.
[5]
Ecker, J. G., and Kupferschmid, M. Introduction to Operations Research. John Wiley and Sons, 1988. 509 pp.
[6]
Henrion, D., and Lasserre, J.-B. Detecting global optimality and extracting solutions in GloptiPoly. In Positive polynomials in control, D. Henrion and A. Garulli, Eds., vol. 312 of Lecture Notes on Control and Information Sciences. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005, pp. 293--310. URL: http://homepages.laas.fr/henrion/Papers/extract.pdf.
[7]
Hitz, M. A., and Kaltofen, E. Efficient algorithms for computing the nearest polynomial with constrained roots. In Proc. 1998 Internat. Symp. Symbolic Algebraic Comput. (ISSAC'98) (New York, N. Y., 1998), O. Gloor, Ed., ACM Press, pp. 236--243. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/98/HiKa98.pdf.
[8]
Hitz, M. A., Kaltofen, E., and Lakshman Y. N. Efficient algorithms for computing the nearest polynomial with a real root and related problems. In Proc. 1999 Internat. Symp. Symbolic Algebraic Comput. (ISSAC'99) (New York, N. Y., 1999), S. Dooley, Ed., ACM Press, pp. 205--212. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/99/HKL99.pdf.
[9]
Jacobson, N. Basic Algebra I. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1974.
[10]
Jibetean, D., and de Klerk, E. Global optimization of rational functions: a semidefinite programming approach. Math. Program. 106, 1 (2006), 93--109.
[11]
Kaltofen, E. Computing the irreducible real factors and components of an algebraic curve. Applic. Algebra Engin. Commun. Comput. 1, 2 (1990), 135--148. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/90/Ka90_aaecc.pdf.
[12]
Kaltofen, E., Li, B., Yang, Z., and Zhi, L. Exact certification of global optimality of approximate factorizations via rationalizing sums-of-squares with floating point scalars. In ISSAC 2008 (New York, N. Y., 2008), D. Jeffrey, Ed., ACM Press, pp. 155--163. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/08/KLYZ08.pdf.
[13]
Kaltofen, E., Yang, Z., and Zhi, L. Approximate greatest common divisors of several polynomials with linearly constrained coefficients and singular polynomials. In ISSAC MMVI Proc. 2006 Internat. Symp. Symbolic Algebraic Comput. (New York, N. Y., 2006), J.-G. Dumas, Ed., ACM Press, pp. 169--176. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/06/KYZ06.pdf.
[14]
Kaltofen, E. L., Li, B., Yang, Z., and Zhi, L. Exact certification in global polynomial optimization via sums-of-squares of rational functions with rational coefficients, Jan. 2009. Accepted for publication in J. Symbolic Comput. URL: http://www.math.ncsu.edu/~kaltofen/bibliography/09/KLYZ09.pdf.
[15]
Karmarkar, N. K., and Lakshman Y. N. On approximate GCDs of univariate polynomials. J. Symbolic Comput. 26, 6 (1998), 653--666. Special issue on Symbolic Numeric Algebra for Polynomials S. M. Watt and H. J. Stetter, editors.
[16]
Kharitonov, V. L. Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium of a family of systems of linear differential equations. Differential Equations 14 (1979), 1483--1485.
[17]
Löfberg, J. YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In Proc. IEEE CCA/ISIC/CACSD Conf. (Taipei, Taiwan, 2004). URL: http://control.ee.ethz.ch/~joloef/yalmip.php.
[18]
Marshall, M. Positive Polynomials and Sums of Squares. American Math. Soc., 2008. 187 pp.
[19]
Nie, J., Demmel, J., and Gu, M. Global minimization of rational functions and the nearest GCDs. J. of Global Optimization 40, 4 (2008), 697--718.
[20]
Peyrl, H., and Parrilo, P. A. Computing sum of squares decompositions with rational coefficients. Theoretical Comput. Sci. 409 (2008), 269--281.
[21]
Pope, S., and Szanto, A. Nearest multivariate system with given root multiplicities. Journal of Symbolic Computation 44 (2009), 606--625. URL: http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aszanto/Pope-Szanto-Preprint.pdf.
[22]
Prajna, S., Papachristodoulou, A., Seiler, P., and Parrilo, P. A. SOSTOOLS: Sum of squares optimization toolbox for MATLAB. Available from http://www.cds.caltech.edu/sostools and http://www.mit.edu/~parrilo/sostools, 2004.
[23]
Rezvani, N., and Corless, R. M. The nearest singular polynomial with a given zero, revisited. SIGSAM Bulletin 39, 3 (Sept. 2005), 73--79.
[24]
Ruatta, O., Sciabica, M., and Szanto, A. Over-constrained Weierstrass iteration and the nearest consistent system. Rapport de Recherche 5215, INRIA, www.inria.fr, June 2004. Accepted in Journal of Complexity. URL: ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/galaad/oruatta/RR-5215.pdf.
[25]
Safey El Din, M. Résolution réelle des systèmes polynomiaux en dimension positive. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. Paris VI (Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie), Paris, France, 2001. URL: http://www-spiral.lip6.fr/~safey/these_safey.ps.gz.
[26]
Seidenberg, A. A new decision method for elementary algebra. Annals Math. 60 (1954), 365--374.
[27]
Stetter, H. J. The nearest polynomial with a given zero, and similar problems. SIGSAM Bulletin 33, 4 (Dec. 1999), 2--4.
[28]
Sturm, J. F. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software 11/12 (1999), 625--653.
[29]
Zeng, G. Nonstandard decision methods for the solvability of real polynomial equations. Science in China Series-A Mathematics 42, 12 (1999), 1251--1261.
[30]
Zhi, L., Noda, M.-T., Kai, H., and Wu, W. Hybrid method for computing the nearest singular polynomials. Japan J. Industrial and Applied Math. 21, 2 (June 2004), 149--162. URL: http://www.mmrc.iss.ac.cn/~lzhi/Publications/znkwjjiam04.pdf.
[31]
Zhi, L., and Wu, W. Nearest singular polynomial. J. Symbolic Comput. 26, 6 (1998), 667--675. Special issue on Symbolic Numeric Algebra for Polynomials S. M. Watt and H. J. Stetter, editors.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ISSAC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
July 2010
366 pages
ISBN:9781450301503
DOI:10.1145/1837934
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Gesellschaft fur Informtatik

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. approximate polynomial systems
  2. nearest polynomial with a real root
  3. numeric polynomial inequality
  4. semidefinite programming
  5. sum-of-squares

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ISSAC '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ISSAC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 110 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 395 of 838 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media