I was interested to see this morning at both ASOS and Boohoo are taking steps to nearshore production in the face of increasing shipping disruption around the Red Sea.
This seems like a sensible approach to take to resolve short term issues around supply chain risk and resilience. However, I am willing to bet that both businesses will see additional benefits as a result of this change and are likely not to revert to far east sourcing in the long term.
When we look at the total end-to-end profitability of a garment within a fashion supply chain, we see that there are many more sources of significant cost and margin erosion that are magnified by far east sourcing. If retailers are able to understand how net margin accumulates within their business, then they are far more able to eliminate sources of cost and maximise profitability.
Long lead times and high minimum order quantities associated with far east sourcing are prime examples.
It is a simple fact that the longer the lead time, the more inaccurate the forecast and the more safety stock a business needs to carry. Eliminate the safety stock by nearshoring, on significantly reduced lead time, and you can dramatically reduce mark down and clearance.
Similarly, near shoring provides opportunities for in-season replenishment which is simply not possible with far east sourcing. That opens up opportunities to launch with lower stock levels, assess actual demand levels and replenish only when necessary. Again, lowering residual stocks and reducing mark down and clearance.
And there are many more examples ….
By applying a deeper understanding of the sources of net margin erosion to end-to-end supply chain management, we have been able to demonstrate double digit growth in full price sell-through for clients.
Interested? Then get in touch to learn more.
#fashionretail #retailsupplychain #supplychainmanagement #sourcingstrategy #bearingpoint
Exclusive: Asos and Boohoo turn to nearshoring as Red Sea crisis intensifies | Retail Week (retail-week.com)