Euros Case Update: England 🏴 v Spain 🇪🇸 England have lost their claim against Spain. Mr Justice François Letexier determines that it is NOT coming home. #euros
Sporting Legal’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Any steps to streamline dealings with EU nation states post Brexit is likely to be welcomed by UK businesses. Those needing to enforce a judgment against an entity based in an EU country may be interested to know progress is being made on the ratification of the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (Convention). The Convention is one dealing with the recognition and enforcement of judgments. Sarah Emerson and Moya Clifford discuss where we are now, the benefits of ratification and what's next. Read more: https://lnkd.in/evtVGSpG #Judgement #PostBrexit #HagueConvention
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you need to have an order discharged, you can request the court to do so by submitting an application. You or the other party involved can write to the court, outlining the reasons why the order should be lifted. A family court judge will then assess the situation and decide whether the order should be removed WorkPermitCloudLawyers #sponsorlicence #ukimmigration #sponsorlicenceapplication #skilledworkersponsor #skilledworkerroute #uksponsor #lawyers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢 Increase in official fees in Russia: Starting from 9 September 2024, official fees in Russia will increase significantly. The Supreme Court of Russia supports this change to reflect current economic realities and the growing costs of judicial processes. Key changes include: 💸 Appealing a decision of the Patent Office at the IP Court: 3,000 RUB → 50,000 RUB (about EUR 520) 💸 Non-property claim in court (eg, banning the use of a domain): 6,000 RUB → 50,000 RUB (about EUR 520) 💸 Property claim in court: 2,000 to 200,000 RUB → 10,000 to 10,000,000 RUB (about EUR 105 – 104000) These changes will impact both domestic and foreign applicants. Stay informed and plan accordingly! Read more for further details ⬇ #IPRussia #OfficialFees #LegalUpdate #PapulaNevinpat
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In a recent development, the Supreme Court of Canada is set to hear an appeal regarding the proper application of the test for jurisdiction – where the party is seeking to ground jurisdiction based on a contract connected with the province. It may sound technical – but this will be an important case that impacts the reach of Canadian courts in the context of global business operations. In anticipation of the Supreme Court of Canada’s review, Chloe Snider and Nicole Tzannidakis review the diverging reasons from the Ontario Court of Appeal, which reflect two different approaches to the test for jurisdiction. https://lnkd.in/g5fYwBfK #Litigation #SupremeCourtofCanada #OntarioCourtofAppeal #VanBredaTest
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In a recent development, the Supreme Court of Canada is set to hear an appeal regarding the proper application of the test for jurisdiction – where the party is seeking to ground jurisdiction based on a contract connected with the province. It may sound technical – but this will be an important case that impacts the reach of Canadian courts in the context of global business operations. In anticipation of the Supreme Court of Canada’s review, Chloe Snider and Nicole Tzannidakis review the diverging reasons from the Ontario Court of Appeal, which reflect two different approaches to the test for jurisdiction. https://lnkd.in/eu5RN2cw #Litigation #SupremeCourtofCanada #OntarioCourtofAppeal #VanBredaTest
Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal regarding test for assumption of jurisdiction based on contract connected to the province
share.dentons.social
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Foreign Surcharge Purchaser Duty (SPD) commenced in 2016, however it continues to challenge solicitors who fail to identify when a client will be liable for it. Our Legal Risk Manager, Glenda Carry, outlines the circumstances in the decision of Van der Zanden v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue, a case about the importance of checking whether or not clients - especially those on bridging visas - are liable for SPD. Key takeaway: Always consider SPD liabilities when acting for purchasers of residential land. Watch now at https://lnkd.in/gaRZX3XD
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🇬🇧 📢 Update on #Hague #Judgments #Convention: UK has signed 2019 Judgments Convention: a significant stride in the realm of worldwide recognition and enforcement. 🗓️ Yesterday (January 12, 2024), Lord Bellamy KC, representing United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, signed the 2019 Judgments Convention, officially known as the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the #Recognition and #Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. 🌐 This Convention is already in effect in 29 member states. It will become effective in the UK following the deposit of a #ratification instrument as per Article 28(2) of the Convention. 🔗 For more details, visit the Judgments Section on the HCCH website (see comments) #PIL #privateinternationallaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Understanding Deportation 📚🚫 Dive into our guide on navigating deportation proceedings and how to protect yourself. #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyer #QueenCityImmigration #ClevelandLaw #ClevelandLawyer #DeportationDefense #LegalProtection
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Please read this article!
A long video, but crucial for Canadian and non-Canadian businesses located in Canada to see, as well as all other Canadians... Please share this video. As the video explains, Canadian Bill C-63 (the "Online Harms Act") wholly opposes basic Charter Rights (protecting liberty, against unreasonable seizure, etc.), and is intentionally ignorant of the constitutional division between federal Canadian jurisdiction and Provincial rights (e.g., property, etc.). Any Government that even conceives and proposes statutory provisions like these is clearly anti-democratic (and unhinged) and it invites opposition and resistance.
Online Harms Bill is Worse Than We Thought - Lawyer Explains
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA All former British Colonies and Commonwealth Realms, the litigants suffers in silence, dying without justice and dignity. A universal unjust law problem, Read: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Ramesh Mishra v Attorney General of Canada File: A-311-98 lX Volumes of evidence of atrocities inflicted by the Canadian Judiciary on a Canadian citizen and 25 millions Canadian dollar valued property invaded by the City of Ottawa. Most judges of the Supreme Court of Canada went wild to protect the Shell Canada who teratogenically contaminated the Centertown of Ottawa where Ramesh Mishra owned property, Justin Trudeau a great Prime Minister to reform the Canadian Judiciary to protect the public. 90 % Canadians are self represented and mistreated by the wild judges, courts are dysfunctional and most lawyers are shysters. 90% Leave to Appeal Application are arbitrarily dismissed. Injustice to a human is injustice to all. Justin Trudeau is a skilled Prime Minister, he can reform Canada as a great country, Judges universally behave like God/Gooses, consciously mistreat litigants having superior intelligence than judges, Judges have to also reform themselves as a average human, More and more Canadians are unhappy with the cruel,unjust law.Canada due to atrocities and miscarriage of justice is no more a attractive country to the investors and the entrepreneur, who are leaving Canada. This is a lethal image of justice Canada.
Chris Selley: Canada's Supreme Court justices gone wild
nationalpost.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
819 followers