Snell & Wilmer’s Post

Really enjoyed editing this article with Muhammad Hani Ahsan, brilliantly written by Caled Al-Adsani for Cornell Policy Review. The Principles of Administrative Law are always evolving, whether in the United States or worldwide. In the US, Administrative Law has been intricately developed by centuries of interaction between the judiciary and the executive, reflecting its evolution over time. Chevron Deference stands out as a landmark case that shaped the dynamic between government agencies and the judiciary. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliver its ruling on Chevron, there's a lot of anticipation regarding its potential impact. Our latest article delves into the implications of Chevron Deference, offering insights into how this ruling may steer crucial decisions that shape governance in the United States. #AdministrativeLaw #ChevronDeference #SupremeCourt

📢Landmark #SCOTUS Decisions Restrain Federal Administrative Agency Power⚖️ The Supreme Court has issued landmark decisions in 𝘓𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘷. 𝘙𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 and 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘌𝘹𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘷. 𝘑𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘴𝘺, drastically changing the landscape of federal administrative authority. The end of Chevron deference and new limitations on SEC in-house tribunals mark a significant shift in how agencies operate. Read the full update by Husch Blackwell's Gregg Sofer and Joseph Diedrich to understand the implications for businesses: https://lnkd.in/gqZNab-G

Since 1984, Chevron Deference has empowered public administrators to interpret laws, shaping policy implementation. However, it faces possible overturning in the Supreme Court. Without Chevron, agencies' powers shrink, courts face interpretation battles, and Congress struggles with detailed legislation. The stakes are high: overturning Chevron would reorder federal legislation, reshape executive authority, and elevate the judiciary's power. MPA Caled Al-Adsani explores the history of Chevron Deference and the potential impacts of its removal. Read more: https://lnkd.in/eHDRkaEe #CornellPolicyReview #CornellMPA #GovernmentAndPolitics #ChevronDeference #SupremeCourt 

In late June, the 40-year-old Chevron doctrine came to an end. Recent court rulings and state actions are reshaping the landscape of regulatory authority. With uncertainty at the federal level, state legislators are adjusting to this new era by more clearly defining agency authority and discretion in their statutes. However, the Midwestern Legislative Conference panelists agreed that industries and interest groups will litigate or relitigate agency authority to make specific regulations. #Chevron #ChevronRuling #LoperBright #SupremeCourt https://lnkd.in/gqCvtuju

Is so-called "Chevron Deference" on the chopping block? 2 cases before the #supremecourt will be heard on Wednesday that could reshape regulatory power by limiting or reversing the influential 1984 case of Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. The 1984 Chevron decision stands for the proposition that judges should defer to federal agency interpretations of any ambiguities in the laws they are charged to implement, so long as such interpretations are "reasonable" under the circumstances. Some legal observers have long argued that Chevron Deference has led to unreasonable overreach by federal agencies and that #congress alone should fill in the gaps in #legislation #federallaw The Wall Street Journal has gone so far as to editorialize that this "judicial doctrine has become a license for regulators to grab power from Congress." #regulatorycompliance #regulators The cases are Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc., v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Dept. of Commerce.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has overturned the longstanding precedent set by Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. In a 6-3 ruling in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Court declared that courts may no longer defer to an agency's interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous. This decision marks a significant shift in administrative law, moving away from the deference traditionally granted to federal agencies under the Chevron doctrine established in 1984. The overturning of Chevron represents a pivotal moment in the interpretation and application of regulatory statutes, emphasizing the judiciary's role in safeguarding the rule of law. #ButlerSnow #GovCon #SupremeCourt #ChevronDoctrine #AdministrativeLaw #RegulatoryCompliance https://lnkd.in/eT4eB3kk

In a 6-3 decision handed down on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court reversed the Chevron doctrine, a decades-old precedent. The bottom line going forward is that courts, not agencies, have the final say in interpreting statutes. To learn more about what the Court had to say read our latest #LegalAlert authored by Brett Johnson, Ryan Regula, Ryan Hogan, Charlene Warner, Cole Craghan, and Savannah Wix. https://bit.ly/3XQ1hOB #LegalAlert #SCOTUS #ChevronDoctrine

For nearly four decades, the Chevron deference has been a hallmark of administrative law. This doctrine, under which federal courts defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, has been criticized as an insurmountable obstacle to those wishing to challenge an agency action. Two forthcoming decisions, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce, will be argued on January 17, 2024, potentially providing avenues for the Supreme to walk back or even eliminate the doctrine. To learn more, read our latest #LegalAlert authored by Brett Johnson, Ryan Hogan, and Savannah Wix. https://bit.ly/3S4FBd8 #ChevronDoctrine #AdministrativeLaw #SpecialLitigationandCompliance

🚨 Supreme Court shake-up in transportation 🚨 The recent SCOTUS decision overturning the Chevron Doctrine could reshape how regulations are made across industries, including transportation. While the change won't be immediate, expect more careful rulemaking and judicial scrutiny ahead. 🚛📜 For a deeper dive click the link: https://lnkd.in/ebpjdr2n

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, shifting the power to interpret ambiguous statutes from federal agencies to the judiciary. This ruling eliminates the precedent requiring courts to defer to agency interpretations, potentially leading to increased litigation and regulatory uncertainty (Ropes & Gray LLP) (The CommLaw Group). Now the question is, what are the possible implications for FEMA? Read more here: https://lnkd.in/e6ZM-XyC