Call for a Uniform Policy on Research Publications 🚨 Addressing Exploitation in Research: A Call to Action 🚨 As researchers and scholars, we dedicate countless hours to advancing knowledge, yet we face two persistent issues that threaten the integrity of academia: 1️⃣ Exorbitant publication charges that limit access for many researchers. 2️⃣ Unethical practices, including research theft and improper attribution. These challenges disproportionately affect early-career researchers and Ph.D. students, creating barriers to equitable knowledge dissemination and recognition for our hard work. Proposed Solution: A Uniform Policy and National Committee To tackle these issues, I propose the establishment of a Uniform Policy for Research Publications under a National Committee for Ethical Research and Publication Standards (NCERPS). This initiative would ensure: 🔑 Affordable and Transparent Publication Practices Capped publication fees for indexed journals. Fee waivers or subsidies for economically disadvantaged researchers. Mandatory disclosure of all publication charges upfront. 🔑 Protection Against Research Theft Strict guidelines for authorship attribution based on contributions. A centralized National Research Repository for transparent tracking of research ownership. Severe penalties for plagiarism and unethical practices. 🔑 Accessible Research for All Government subsidies for publications in high-impact journals. Promotion of open-access research funded by public money. 🔑 Grievance Redressal and Ethical Oversight Institutional Research Ethics Committees to resolve disputes. A centralized portal for reporting unethical practices with anonymity for whistleblowers. Time-bound resolutions for grievances to avoid delays. Why This Matters Academia thrives on fairness and integrity. By adopting such a framework, we can ensure that no researcher is denied the opportunity to share their findings due to financial constraints or exploited by unethical practices. This policy is not just a reform—it’s a necessity for fostering equitable and ethical research globally. Join the Movement I urge fellow researchers, educators, policymakers, and institutions to come together and advocate for these much-needed reforms. Let’s create an ecosystem where knowledge is shared, not restricted, and contributions are valued, not stolen. 👉 What are your thoughts on this proposal? How can we push for such systemic changes? Comment below and let’s discuss! #ResearchReform #AcademicIntegrity #AffordablePublishing #PhDVoices #EthicsInResearch #InnovationForAll
Shubhada Patil’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
❗ 📑 Nou #estudi publicat! “The use of quantitative methods in local government studies, a review and a conclusive message”. 🔬 Les metodologies #quantitatives empíriques són cada cop més sol·licitades en les publicacions #acadèmiques en general. T’interessa saber quina ha estat l’evolució dels estudis de #governlocal i com s’apliquen aquests mètodes en la #recerca? ➡️ Informa’t aquí: https://lnkd.in/dYY2-a5B ____ ❗ 📑 New #study published! “The use of quantitative methods in local government studies, a review and a conclusive message”. 🔬 Empirical #quantitative methodologies are increasingly in demand in #academic publications in general. Are you interested in knowing how #localgovernment studies have evolved and how these methods are applied in #research? ➡️ Find out here: https://lnkd.in/dYY2-a5B Marianna Sebő
The use of quantitative methods in local government studies, a review and a conclusive message
tandfonline.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In Finland, we have this sarcastic saying, "Artisti maksaa" (the artist pays). Seems that it covers more than just the performing arts -- science, as well..! The producer of art or knowledge is expected to cover the costs of their work themselves, so that others can enjoy it for free, or even gain from it. Fair? As someone, who has worked for a small non-profit journal that has been grouped together with these big publishers because we need subscription and membership fee incomes to pay for the costs, this is so infuriating. We are being pushed into Open Access publishing by funders, who still don't have a solution for how we could cover the costs in the OA model. The only way would be to charge writer's fees, which is not an option for us. Yes, having free and open access to scientific knowledge is great and a noble cause, but it shouldn't be a money-making machine for these big publishers, nor something that presses small publishers to the brink of their existence. #OA #research #publishing
The Big Five is making more profit than drug dealers on the free service of academics justified with “collegiality” and illusion of self importance. University administration favouring impact factors is complicit in this exploitation which does not even produce good science. #lucrativescam #sleepwalking #paytheexperts Elsevier Wiley Sage Springer Custom Media @taylorandfrancis dhttps://lnkd.in/dK-rRHa5
Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we’re determined to change that | Arash Abizadeh
theguardian.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stealing someone’s research or Ph.D. thesis is not just unethical—it is a grave violation of intellectual property rights and academic integrity. Such acts undermine the trust in academic systems and discourage genuine researchers from pursuing innovative work. Setting up a government-led Independent Academic Integrity Committee would be an effective step toward addressing this problem. This committee could: 1. Investigate Allegations: Act as an impartial body to investigate cases of research theft and plagiarism. 2. Establish Protocols: Define clear protocols and deterrent penalties for academic misconduct, including suspension or disqualification. 3. Strengthen Digital Safeguards: Promote the use of plagiarism-detection tools and blockchain-based timestamping for all submissions. 4. Raise Awareness: Conduct workshops to educate researchers and institutions about their rights and the importance of ethical practices. 5. Encourage Reporting: Set up anonymous reporting systems to protect whistleblowers from retaliation. 6. Monitor Research Policies: Regularly review academic guidelines and suggest updates to prevent loopholes. Such a framework will ensure accountability and protect researchers from harassment and exploitation, fostering a healthier academic environment.
Two professors booked for 'stealing PhD thesis'
dailypioneer.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New Early View Article! Be sure to check out "The dynamics of issue attention in policy process scholarship" available now in the Policy Studies Journal. Read full article here: #PSJ #PolicyStudiesJournal
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12548
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In a month, we'll be releasing our third Annual Report. It's been an epic journey just writing it. Here's what it covers: * METRICS - Deprogramming researchers from valuing prestige metrics to valuing the precision and accuracy of their words. * REVIEW - Providing post-publication review to help authors create community, support pedagogy, self-correct misinformation, and attain testimonials about the merit and impact of their work. * IP - Checking who all the co-owners of the IP are in case funders and/or university/employers need to be added as co-authors to receive payment per PDF full-text sale for the provision of infrastructure and reputation. * PAYMENT - Reparative vs extractive capitalism, wage theft, modern slavery, whistleblowing, misogynoir, neoliberalism, authoritarianism, HASS, and researchers as 'cash cows'. * TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS - Authors planning their sales plan to put dollars straight into their pocket at the point of each sale, and contributing to a collective pot for two future wealth-distribution schemes. * TRANSFORMATIVE AGREEMENTS - Watching out for 'open washing' where researchers believe they're supporting freedom of information but there's a hefty hidden publishing fee. * ACCOUNTABILITY - Artificial intelligence (AI), paper mills, plagiarism, gatekeeping, academia as a 'domestic violence' relationship, hate speech, and academic freedom. 20+ years of hard learned lessons are being put to good use so that the researchers still in academia, as well as the researchers no longer there, can finally work in a system that is actually fit for purpose and returns the power of voice and money back to the rightful earners. Watch this space - we'll keep you posted!
Scholar Freedom | LinkedIn
au.linkedin.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💡Pay Only When You Cite: A New Approach to Academic Article Access Recently, I came across a thought-provoking discussion about accessing academic research without university affiliation. ☀️Reflecting on my first year at Uppsala University during my summer break, I’ve been particularly struck by a course titled “Data, Ethics, and Law.” One discussion that stood out was about the financial and logistical hurdles researchers face in accessing paid academic articles. These challenges often discourage researchers from exploring a wide range of literature due to cost concerns or uncertainty about the usefulness of the articles. 🔦This led me to an intriguing idea: what if researchers could read as many articles as they need for free, but pay only if they decide to cite them in their own work? 📈This model would enable researchers to freely explore and identify the most relevant articles without the financial burden, while still ensuring that authors receive compensation when their work is directly utilized. It strikes a balance between accessibility and the rightful earnings of researchers, promoting both academic growth and sustainability. Innovative solutions like this could significantly enhance academic research accessibility and foster a more inclusive scholarly community. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this idea.✨ #OpenAccess #AcademicPublishing #AcademicArticles #Research
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How and which #matrices to use to assess a #researcher’s #impact? This paper provides a broad description of those used in #academia so far. They also discuss them as well as provide #limitations to these matrices. https://lnkd.in/gqcM8z3G Charles H. Cho, PhD, CPA, Erica Pimentel PhD, CPA, CA, Julie Bernard, Joel Bothello, Alessandro Ghio, Dr. Leanne Keddie
Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Important research. Get into it and sign up!
UCL Institute of Education; London South Bank University; Social Research & Practice and Education Ltd.
Call for participants for "Ripped off in Academia: Costs and Consequences of Unethical Practices in Research" Have you experienced or witnessed unethical practices (e.g. ideas getting stolen, people's names being put on articles when they shouldn't be or not being put when they should be, messiness around grant applications, any other unethical or doutbful practices)? Can you spare 45 to 60 mins for an interview? Please, get in touch!! Details via the link, but email is nicole . brown @ ucl . ac . uk https://lnkd.in/dcYGEGqf
Ripped off in Academia: Costs and Consequences of Unethical Practices in Research - Dr Nicole Brown
https://www.nicole-brown.co.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pleased to have a space for my research article titled "Family Involvement in Business and Intellectual Capital Performance: Evidences from Indian Listed Companies" in a Scopus-indexed journal, Education, Administration: Theory and Practice.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"We regret to inform you that..." - can actually be ... good news‼ The path to publication is not also without complications. Every author will have to confront rejection at some point in their career. The trick is to turn the situation into one which enables you to end up with either a better publication or a more suitable home for your research. Chances are, if a researcher resubmits the work to another journal, it will be cited more often, according to study “Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns” published in Science in 2012. The finding should not only reassure frustrated scientists, but also persuade indexing platforms not to promote high rejection rates. Clearily, submission history affected the post-publication impact (citation count) of articles. The study found that citation counts were higher for papers that had been previously rejected than for papers that were published without prior rejection. Moreover, this trend was true regardless of the journal impact factor. This seems to indicate that peer reviewer comments received on submission to high-impact-factor journals help improve the final quality of papers, even if they are subsequently published in a journal with a lower impact factor. In the late 1960s, an economist went through rejections from three journals before eventually publishing the paper, “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” which went on to become one of the most influential papers in economics. The author, Prof. Akerlof, was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2001. This is your sign to never give up‼
To view or add a comment, sign in