Saxon Financial Services’ Post

Informed consent is vital to our research at IBBPS, providing participants with comprehensive information and safeguarding their rights. It's our commitment to ethical and transparent practices. 🧬🔒 #DUHS #informedconsent #clinicalresearch #clinicaltrials #research #medical #health

Motivational Interviewing & Cultural Humility: Integrating Practices to Engage People Who Use Drugs Free CE's available for Social work, LMHC, OT, PT April 17th 12-1 pm #RegisterNow https://lnkd.in/eKdN-Hz2 #RualHeathcare #HealthcareEducation #Healthcare #HealthcareProfessionals #ContinuingEducation

In the dynamic realm of healthcare, conflicts often arise from ego clashes among providers. Whether one is a seasoned practitioner or a recent graduate, recognizing the diverse expertise within the team is paramount. 🌟 For instance, senior doctors, with their wealth of experience, can gain valuable insights from newcomers, such as #clinical #pharmacists versed in modern medications and their interactions. 💊 The key is to shift focus from individual pride to a shared commitment to patient health. 🤝 Upholding individual rights and responsibilities is essential, fostering an environment where constructive objections are embraced. Let's collectively prioritize patient well-being, setting aside egos for a harmonious and effective healthcare collaboration. 🏥 #HealthcareHarmony #CollaborativeCare #PatientFirst

"Count us in!". I had just finished presenting to the GPs, nurses and Practice Manager of a General Practice, offering Positive Medicine as a solution to the current, growing crisis (primary care is in crisis in the UK too). The practice is now planning to train their team and deliver Positive Medicine for their patients. We're on the verge of launching our new Positive Medicine programme, Healing Me: The Journey to Health. It teaches patients how to be experts in their own health, how to take control of their lives and find whole person health and healing. The healthcare dream team: doctors as experts in disease management and patients as experts in their own health. A patient empowerment model - with great power comes great responsibility. Of course our health is our own responsibility! Come and join us on the journey to 'Evolving Healthcare for Humanity". Join the (free) Positive Medicine Community: https://lnkd.in/gq2m7awU For all healthcare professions in the community... (Doctors, nurses, health coaches, anyone with a health qualification OR in training to obtain one)... Come and join us in the Academy. This will be the hub of Positive Medicine development and implementation. It provides its own supportive community of practitioners learning the principles and practice of Positive Medicine. We are planning regular workshops where we share and build ideas, this will be the first place we release the new Positive Medicine Podcast. Share questions, challenges, wins, ideas. Subscription for the Academy: $40 per month, or $400 per year. For those wanting to undertake the Certified Positive Medicine Practitioner training the cost for the course and certification is $1,000. We have waved this fee up to now - act quickly if you want to sign up, the fee waiver ends on 15 February (Apologies: The NZ Doctor article on the crisis in general practice is behind a pay wall. You get the point though). #PositiveMedicine https://lnkd.in/gZhP8jHa.

It's a bad habit to badmouth a fellow physician and much worse to badmouth a fellow clinician. Here are some tactics to consider. 🔹 Stop saying anything negative about any fellow clinician on any platform. 🔹 Instead, point out where you disagree. 🔹 Talk about how their action or behavior or opinion made you feel. 🔹 If it's patient-facing, point out that it's not the way you do thing. 🔹 If the patient is badmouthing the clinician, give them the forum to express themselves fully; you don't owe anyone a nod or shake of the head. 🔹 Understand that you don't know the whole story so don't be quick to hang that doctor. 🔹 Just as you think you're right another doctor things they are right. 🔹 Use the opportunity as a teaching point when creating your online content. 🔹 You might get the immediate approval of the patient but you'll lose their long-term trust when you partake in their badmouthing. #health #healthcare #medicine #physicians #culture #medicine

Dr David Lam's web portal ‘GP Lyf Hacks’ aims to provide equal access to high-quality medical training, especially in rural areas, and to help create resilient communities by offering free online educational resources to rural healthcare workers. ISER actively promotes initiatives that adopt and progress the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Learn how this is the case with ‘GP Lyf Hacks’. ➡ https://lnkd.in/gqNaRtVN Disclaimer: The web portal ‘GP Lyf Hacks’ provides general health literacy, not specific health advice. #SDG3, #SDG10, #SDG11 #health #uoa #iser

True insight and collaboration are rare. It was a great privilege to attend yesterday’s Public Policy Projects’s London & South-East Integrated Care Delivery Forum. My friend Lee Davies and his team have done an outstanding job of curating not just the best speakers but those who can give actionable insight. From the get go, this was an event full of excellent thought leadership. Stephen Dorrell Chaired throughout the day, keeping things moving along without constraining the discussion. The first session from William Pope and Susannah Howard of the NHS Suffolk and North East Essex Integrated Care Board was brilliant. ICSs are merely 18 months old yet the team in Suffolk and North-East Essex seem to have created a truly collaborative eco-system focused on collaboration at all levels. The session after that, on partnerships, pulled no punches with david sloman, Frances O'Callaghan and Rhian Vandrill telling it how it is and reflections on how we exist in an ecosystem where organisations like Nuffield Health, can contribute too. The next session on innovation, chaired by Masood Ahmed took us to places we didn’t perhaps expect but a much needed debate on equality in recruitment of medical student was energetic and interesting. Penny Dash pulled no punches - which is exactly what we needed to hear. Neither did Tal M. or Katrina Percy. It was good to hear from Stephen Jowett about the importance of data as an enabler of innovation. Rounding of the day with an important report on Community Pharmacy, it was good to hear from David Tamby Rajah, Yousaf Ahmad and Ursula Montgomery. It was great to be part of the encourages of both Hassan Chaudhury and Clive Flashman 💙 and to meet so many folks focused on solving the biggest problems in healthcare including Hasseena Winter and Rosalind Way. It’s rare to come away feeling so energised from these kind of events but I certainly felt like some brilliant and catalysing conversations were had. #healthcare #healthcareconsulting #humancentredhealthcare #health

A healthy balance between novelty and sufficiency? Recent EPO Board of Appeal decision T 209/22 considers a novelty-sufficiency squeeze attack in light of a phase I clinical study in healthy volunteers. Nadège Beynon and I review recent decision T 209/22, in which the Appeal Board considers the impact of a disclosure relating to a clinical study in healthy volunteers. The Board comments on the different standards that apply for novelty and sufficiency of disclosure, with the decision highlighting that an attack based on novelty-sufficiency squeeze may not always be effective. Find out more here: https://lnkd.in/e629fvpe #patents #clinicaltrial #intellectualproperty #EPO #lifesciences #healthcare #CMSlaw  CMS Intellectual Property CMS UK CMS Life Sciences & Healthcare Sector

What is a National Health Board or Council reprimand ? 1.         A reprimand is a chastisement for conduct; a formal rebuke. Reprimands issued since the start of the National Scheme are published on the National Registers of Practitioners. It can be imposed in a Tribunal in a prosecution or can be imposed by a Board Panel. 2.         The Board’s seem to take the view that the reprimand to be effective must be published on the register. This means any person – including health funds-  can see the fact that person has been reprimanded. 4.         Tribunals and Courts have consistently found that a reprimand is not a trivial penalty and that it had the potential for serious adverse implications to a professional person. 5.         The period of the reprimands visibility on the register is often a matter of dispute. 6.         Section 226(3) of the National Law gives the Board a discretion to remove the fact of a reprimand from the National Register “if it considers it is no longer necessary or appropriate.”  7.         This statutory provision is in conflict with the applicable Ahpra policy, which was the subject of some criticism by his Honour Judge Allen KC, in Health Ombudsman v Gillespie [2021] QCAT 54 at [50], in that there is an automatic five year period of the recording of the fact of the reprimand on the public register pursuant to the Ahpra policy and that an application for non-publication ‘cannot be made’ in the five year period, and a refusal to end publication of the reprimand is not appealable in the Tribunal (although may be challenged as a judicial review). 8.         In Health Ombudsman v HNH [2021] QCAT 235 at [36] the Tribunal observed The Tribunal has no power to make any order as to how long the reprimand of the respondent remains recorded on the register. That is a decision for the Board. However, there is no prohibition on the Tribunal expressing a view on such matter, providing it is clear that the ultimate determination of such matter remains solely a matter for the Board. 9.         In other decisions Tribunals have made similar recommendations to that in Medical Board of Australia v YOS [2023] QCAT 164 and Medical Board of Australia v Kyaw  [2016] QCAT 34 at [28]. PRACTICAL APPLICATION 10.      Health Practitioners agreeing to reprimands should be aware that if the matter is before a Tribunal, the Tribunal may not be persuaded that it can set an end of publication date for the reprimand, but may express a recommendation of a lesser period. 11.      If the reprimand is imposed by a Council or Board Panel rather than a Tribunal it may be argued that the Board or Tribunal has the power to set an end of publication date and is a matter of policy for the Board or Council. 12.      Legal practitioners should be aware of the effects of a reprimand on health practitioner clients particularly if imposed and on the register for 5 years and give some thought to seeking shorter periods of publication if possible.