Sam Edwards’ Post

View profile for Sam Edwards, graphic

Partner - Shepherd, Smith, Edwards & Kantas, LLP - Representing Investors Nationwide in Disputes over Faulty and Fraudulent Investments and Schemes

It is hard to believe that firms like this still exist. With most major firms giving away trading now, it makes no sense to have investments with a firm that charges commissions for trading, thus encouraging churning accounts to make commissions. It is good that FINRA took action, which should protect investors, but it is misleading to suggest that Reg BI enforcement somehow led to this outcome. These behaviors were always a violation of industry rules and regulations and Reg BI did absolutely nothing to impact FINRA's actions here. In my opinion, Reg BI remains a weak rule that is meant to give those who provide investment advice a free pass from acting as fiduciaries when they know investors all expect and deserve that standard of care. #investorprotection

FINRA Hits Another BD With Reg BI-Related Fine | ThinkAdvisor

FINRA Hits Another BD With Reg BI-Related Fine | ThinkAdvisor

thinkadvisor.com

Lisa Snyderman

Experienced Broker/Dealer and Investment Advisor Compliance Consultant. CCO & FINRA Registered Principal

1y

There are a lot of firms that still charge commissions. They provide a service. Not everyone has the knowledge or the ability to make their own trades and they may not want to pay an investment advisor. People can choose to pay a commission, or pay an investment advisor or do it all on their own for free. I think people should understand their investments regardless of how they do them, but often that is not the case.

Totally agree, churning is churning, and never in the client’s best interest. 

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics