Rinesh Chetty’s Post

Seven-Figure Settlement for Spinal Cord Injury Victim The general public places enormous trust in the medical profession, a reliance that is rarely misplaced. Where incidences of clinical negligence occur, however, specialist lawyers can prove invaluable, as was evidenced in a claim centring around the issue of patient consent that resulted in a seven-figure settlement. The claimant, a woman in her fifties, had undergone successful bowel surgery after being diagnosed with cancer. Prior to the operation, 10 attempts were made by consultant anaesthetists to place an epidural into the woman’s back to provide post-operative pain relief. Three attempts were made while the woman was conscious and seven were made after general anaesthesia, when the woman was unconscious. As a result of one of the epidural attempts, damage was caused to the woman’s spinal cord ... ... The woman was awarded £1.3 million in damages, the full value of her claim. For legal help and advice on clinical negligence matters, please speak to Mike Sutton on 08081668827. #clinicalnegligence #personalinjury #compensation https://lnkd.in/geHgirQB

What a great edition of the Medico-Legal magazine this is. Some fantastic articles included and not least one from my super talented colleague Bethan Parry. Check them all out below. https://lnkd.in/epDxfdba

The legal system employs a multifaceted approach to hold negligent doctors accountable, including the use of medical expert witnesses. However, challenges such as the 'white coat of silence' can impede this process. Professional societies and legal standards play crucial roles in ensuring accountability, but there's ongoing debate about the best methods to protect patients while ensuring fair treatment for healthcare professionals. The American legal system is well equipped to deal with medical expert witnesses and expose their level of competence and credibility, says Dr. Graboff. But because of the “white coat of silence” the legal system is hampered by a lack of well qualified doctors willing to testify against those doctors whose negligence has damaged patients, and in some, who repeatedly cause injury to patients. "This 'code of silence' unwritten rule that a doctor doesn’t testify against another doctor is fortified by professional associations like the AAOS who through their 'professional compliance programs' intimidate their members by censure, suspension, expulsion, public humiliation, and damage to their reputations to not testify against their fellow doctors." Finally, says Dr. Graboff, "This 'white coat of silence’ needs to be removed and professional societies like the AAOS need to stop their practice of expert witness intimidation and 'back door tort reform.'” "The court in my lawsuit against the AAOS, having unanimously ruled in my favor, obviously arrived at the same conclusion." #unitedseniorassociation #usa #hss #oig #cms #eldercare #seniorhealth #hssoig #fda #RPM #healthcare

Great issue of the Medico-Legal magazine with some really interesting content. Thanks Lisa Cheyne @MedicolegalMag1 for including my recent article on the importance of instructing the right expert! #healthcare #clinicalnegligence #medicolegal

Legal Analysis of Medical Negligence Case: A Detailed Examination On September 5, 2000, the patient, referred to as "A" received a diagnosis of right kidney damage and a left kidney stone. Subsequently, surgical intervention was recommended for both kidneys. On October 12, 2000, following a fitness assessment, the first surgery was conducted successfully. Postoperatively, the patient's poor tolerance to anesthesia was noted. The attending physician recommended a non-emergency surgery on the second kidney within eight days of the initial procedure. However, the second surgery took place on September 7, 2021, ultimately resulting in the patient's demise. In response to this unfortunate outcome, the deceased's spouse has initiated legal proceedings against the hospital, citing two primary grounds: the absence of a pager system for instantaneous communication and reservations regarding adverse observations made by the inquiry committee. To contextualize this situation, reference is made to two pertinent legal cases. First, the Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences vs. Prasanth S. Dhananka case, where negligence was established due to oversight during surgery, specifically the absence of a neurosurgeon during a critical procedure. Second, the case of Dr. Harish Kumar Khurana vs. Joginder Singh, which highlighted the necessity for substantial medical evidence to substantiate claims of negligence, casting doubt on the conclusiveness of committee reports lacking statutory foundation or the opportunity for cross-examination. In applying these legal precedents to the present case, it is arguable that the doctor performed the surgeries without negligence. This case underscores the importance of comprehensive medical evaluations and the imperative role of effective communication systems within healthcare institutions. Deepak Srinivasan and K. Vijay Sathya #MedicalNegligence #LegalAnalysis #HealthcareEthics #LegalPrecedents #FormalCommunication #law #legalawareness #highcourt #supremecourt #supremecourtofindia Do follow and share our posts for more legal information.

Waranch & Brown, LLC congratulates April Hitzelberger, Rachel Giroux, Esquire and Michelle Dian on securing summary judgment on behalf of their ophthalmology client!  W&B argued, and the Circuit Court for Montgomery County agreed, the plaintiff failed to establish that the alleged negligence caused her retinal injury.    Please contact W&B if we can assist with any medical malpractice needs! We are here to help.   #summaryjudgment #medicalmalpractice #causation #ophthalmology #waranchbrown

Available for instruction are British Medical Experts, they provide access to a wide range of highly experienced medical professionals, trained in the specifics of delivering quality testimonials, on target and on time.Providing courts with expert opinion and prognosis on the impact of trauma is critical to achieving resolution for the claimant or defendant. Analysis of medical records to establish evidence on the prognosis of a client following medical or dental treatment. Helping to establish facts on breach of duty and causation claims. They can be contacted via the link below; #expertwitness

*Roentgen’s Law* The length of a radiologist’s report is inversely proportional to the certainty of his diagnosis. *Machiavelli’s Law* A patient/relative who says in his first visit that he has full faith in you has already consulted at least three other doctors for his problem. *Cochrane’s Aphorism* Before ordering a test, decide what you will do if it is a) Positive or b) Negative If answers for both are the same, don’t do the test. *Indoor Anachronism* Patients who need to be admitted the most, always refuse to get admitted. Those who can be sent home want to stay on. *Arrogance Law* The arrogance of a patient’s relative is inversely proportional to his ability and willingness to pay the hospital bill. *Murphy’s Law* If anything can go wrong, it will. *Gattuso’s Extension of Murphy’s Law* Nothing is ever so bad that it can’t get worse. *Adam’s Law* Many fractures used to heal even when there were no orthopaedic surgeons. *Placebo Rules* Placebos work only if they are expensive. Placebos sometimes work better than real drugs. A sympathetic physician is often the best placebo! 🌺🌺🌺

Major clinical approaches to tooth whitening techniques and differences in terms of sensitivity and protection: a systematic review - https://lnkd.in/gS6V2VMn

Identifying Medical Malpractice: 5 Key Indicators Spotting these signs is crucial in ensuring justice for victims of medical malpractice: 1. Diagnostic Errors: Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to serious consequences for patients. Look for instances where proper testing or examination could have prevented harm. 2. Surgical Mishaps: From wrong-site surgery to anesthesia errors, surgical mistakes are clear signs of malpractice. Any deviation from standard operating procedures warrants scrutiny. 3. Medication Missteps: Administering incorrect medication or dosage can have grave repercussions. Keep an eye out for instances of medication errors and their impact on patient safety. 4. Documentation Discrepancies: Discrepancies or omissions in medical records may signal attempts to cover up mistakes. Ensure thorough review of documentation for inconsistencies. 5. Lack of Informed Consent: Patients have the right to understand treatment risks. Failure to obtain informed consent raises questions about ethical practice and patient autonomy. Trust Med Legal Pro to provide expert guidance and support in navigating complex medical-legal cases. #MedicalMalpractice #LegalSupport #PatientSafety