IASIU - North Texas Chapter’s Post

Going into an interview without prepping your own questions for the interviewer sets you up to fail. IMO its the most important thing you can bring to an interview. - It helps you build rapport - It creates conversation over a one-way dynamic - It shows your interest in the interviewer - It can play to the interviewers ego brain - It demonstrates your thinking - It will make you stand out Listen to the first few minutes of this and tell me what you think! #interviewtips #offshoring #offshorejobs #Frank

Excellent analysis and insight from one of the best.

Today is the solar eclipse! Listen to Tim's interview on Mix 94.1 to learn more about what Tim suggests to keep you safe!

Steps of Conducting Investigation To conduct effective investigation Step 1: Acknowledge there is a problem to be investigated Need for investigation Step 2: Appoint investigator, can be an internal or external investigator who is neutral or impartial, who have no interest in either part, that's why we are here for you. Impartial, confidential and professional Step 3: Plan the investigation, here is planning the process of investigation, what evidence needed, who to interview, interview questions, investigation policy Step 4: Conduct investigation, collecting evidence, analyzing, interviewing, Step 5: writing report findings based on evidence and interview conducted, Conclusion and Recommendations Step 6: Submitting the report, sharing with the outcome and communicate the results Ranger Detective Agency Limited www.rangerdetective.co.ke [email protected] Call/ WhatsApp +255741531002 #Fraud #privateinvestigator #backgroundcheck #duediligence #privateinvestigators #surveillance

Tips on interrogating people for information and confessions, with David Zulawski by Zachary Elwood A reshare of a talk with David Zulawski from 2018. Zulawksi is an expert in interrogation and interview techniques and the cofounder of Wicklander Zulawski and Associates. Topics discussed include: Why is the non-confrontational, rapport-focused technique he recommends the best one? Why is it important to downplay the significance of a crime? Why is it […] #boomers #babyboomers

Steps of Conducting Investigation Conducting effective investigation Step 1: Acknowledge there is a problem to be investigated Need for investigation Step 2: Appoint investigator, can be an internal or external investigator who is neutral or impartial, who have no interest in either part, that's why we are here for you. Impartial, confidential and professional Step 3: Plan the investigation, here is planning the process of investigation, what evidence needed, who to interview, interview questions, investigation policy Step 4: Conduct investigation, collecting evidence, analyzing, interviewing, Step 5: writing report findings based on evidence and interview conducted, Conclusion and Recommendations Step 6: Submitting the report, sharing with the outcome and communicate the results Ranger Detective Agency Limited www.rangerdetective.co.ke [email protected] Call/ WhatsApp +255741531002 #Fraud #privateinvestigator #backgroundcheck #duediligence #privateinvestigators #surveillance

🔍 How do you find the hidden details that make or break a case? Sometimes, the most critical information isn't immediately apparent. It takes a keen eye and thorough questioning to uncover hidden details during witness interviews, surveillance or investigative research. Our private investigators are trained to dig deeper, asking the right follow-up questions and reading between the lines to uncover information that others might miss. This meticulous approach can reveal the details that turn a case around. Don't miss out on crucial details. Contact us via phone, DM or email for help with your investigation! #LegalSupport #PrivateInvestigation #HiddenDetails #WitnessInterviews #LawFirm #ThoroughInvestigation

Rolf Magnus GrungRagnhild Klingenberg Røed In this new paper, we examine the impact of interviewer rejections following “Don't know” responses in forensic interviews with alleged preschool-aged victims of abuse. Our findings reveal that interviewers accepted the children's “Don't know” responses 75.3% of the time, while rejecting them 24.7% of the time. Notably, when interviewers rejected these responses, 75.9% of the subsequent answers contradicted the children's initial statements. These results highlight the potential suggestiveness of rejecting “Don't know” responses in such sensitive interviews.

Here's a quick snippet of an interview I did with Chris Jolly, where I discuss how you can protect yourself against the bad actors in the industry. Watch the full interview here: https://buff.ly/42fuHpM

Sent: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 3:31 PM To: LAsrc Subject: RE: Future Partnerships Dear LAsrc In response to your email I did open’ myself up to rereading your messages for what they are. I agree with your statement that the messages were indeed simple messages that you barely gave a second thought to Darren and you approaching CMM for our intercept team will not bring Market Solutions into disrepute.. it does bring SRC into disrepute though Are you proud of MS? (You told me that you were mobbed out of Market Solutions and that that you reached out to another ex-Market Solutions person that was already working at SRC and that you were absolutely surprised when CMM reached out to try to get you back to MS) I also did not appreciate the veiled threat to name other ex-members of SRC by naming them and involving them in your email to Darren (DP)… I felt it was a veiled threat to get others to feel threatened because Darren is supposedly a ‘big shot’ in the industry which makes this whole ‘controversy’ more controversial!!! One person here said.. to point their finger at ‘Darren’ may be career suicide… however I do not depend on DP for my job Your excuse that DP did not know about CMM has left MS in this small and incestuous industry 8 months after she resigned from MS is ‘hard to swallow’.. CMM is not a person that shies away from the limelight and hides away like I do “He didn’t even know she [CMM] had left MS and doesn’t have her contact details.” Do you want to have a go at what is wrong with this sentence? Let me enlighten you – if he thought CMM is still at MS, he would have the information he needed to contact her at MS at his own fingertips, you may not know this but the rest of the world is able to contact us.. it is called ‘google’ I actually believe it is very possible that you really want me to do well.. but you know which side your bread is buttered... you know I am too much of an underdog to back… and according to CMM, you formed an opinion that I am ‘unstable’. (She put this in a fairwork fake bullying claim against me but failed to attend the hearing when I said I had empirical data and witnesses) I too am sorry this has caused so much angst… including causing angst in the other researchers working here So far your leader who has involved you in a ‘controversy’ has left you to take the blame on your own… it has just been radio silence on his end As for the controversy, it is just about to be an extremely large controversy that we have proof from emails left behind that people have been relentless in trying to mob me out of the research industry in the last 2 years.. it spread from within MS to other organisations besides SRC.. and that others in multiple organisations have targeted me to bully us and deprive us of work May 2019- I wrote to CMM and DP May 2019-DP accused me of bullying 3 females at ANUE and SRC but LAsrc was not one of them [Due to long term gaslighting- I need investigations for confirmation]