Matt Prevost’s Post

Good quick reads from RPS and Amwins on the State of the US Cyber Market. https://lnkd.in/eZqWtyX7 https://lnkd.in/e5aC_piG Of particular interest and probably should be in the coverage section (s):

  • No alternative text description for this image

Now we just need to get all those wordings organized so we can know what we are getting

Like
Reply
Barry Rabkin

Begun work on my 2nd book. This one is focused on insurance and cyber. 1st book: “Stone Tablets to Satellites: The Continual Intimate but Awkward Relationship Between the Insurance Industry and Technology".

5d

We use the term "cyber insurance" throughout most, if not all of our discussions, but key questions for existing and future insureds are, at a minimum: 1) how much cyber insurance coverage is each carrier selling (at a moment of time)?, 2) what are the terms, conditions, and restrictions of the cyber cover pieces the carrier is selling, and 3) what are the range of premium levels the carriers are selling for the amounts of cyber cover pieces? To Martin Ellingsworth comment, I sincerely hope that cyber insurers never agree to standardized cyber insurance terms. Cyber risks are as far from being a "mature" or "stabilized known set" as a young star emerging in space is as far from dying. Cyber attacks are similarly nowhere near "mature" nor "stable". Yes, cyber risks have been around, from a cyber insurance perspective, for 20+ years. Irrelevant. Cyber risks are constantly evolving into new and more complex forms. Cyber risks (and their losses) represent a market where past history has very little, if anything, to do with future cyber risks and their losses.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics