Mark Miller’s Post

View profile for Mark Miller, graphic

Liberty movement leader in policy & litigation | Pacific Legal | Notre Dame | Double Gator | Ex-Chief of Staff,SD Gov Kristi Noem | FreeCon | Views my own.

Thank you to Fox News TV for publishing my latest piece ~ on an important "homeless rights" case out of Oregon that has the potential to upend the way cities have addressed homelessness for time immemorial. The best way to address the homeless crisis long term is to relax strict zoning laws that have contributed to the high price of housing our nation faces; costs that make it hard for many to afford housing. By making it easier and cheaper to build housing, we will get more housing- Increase supply, and the prices will go down. Econ 101. I'll have more to say about that in our PLF amicus brief on the case, which we expect to file later this winter. Meanwhile, in my op-ed, I talk about a different issue the case opens up: that is, does the Constitution demand that the government do things for us, or does the Constitution protect us from the government interfering with our rights to pursue what we want to pursue? Here, the Ninth Circuit said that local governments owe the homeless a bed/a place to sleep. If that's true, then years of Court precedent are about to be swept away. https://lnkd.in/g6pF5Sx6

The Supreme Court case that could help cities clean up homelessness

The Supreme Court case that could help cities clean up homelessness

foxnews.com

Neil Di Spirito

I have more than two decades experience helping pharmaceutical, medical device, biologics and life science clients comply with US drug, biological and medical device law.

8mo

Mark Miller in my opinion it’s more about the police powers of the state. Should the state choose to protect its mentally ill, drug addicted, alcohol challenged population by mandatory placement of them in treatment centers (state hospitals) until cured, then it has the power. If it so chooses not to take those actions under its police powers, then it may so choose. Either way, I don’t see it as a Federal Constitutional issue. It’s clear from federal court precedence that the Constitution does not give a person a right to kill themselves (albeit slowly) or violate the law with illegal substance use.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics