Jun 6, 2024 34,929 views • Jun 6, 2024 Can you imagine a foreign country suing American firearms manufacturers trying to end each of them as a business? Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses that exact lawsuit in the matter of Mexico v. Smith & Wesson. This suit, which was thrown out at the trial court level has now been revived by the US Court of Appeals and we are not sure what is more scary[:] [t]he ludicrous claims made by Mexico or the mental gymnastics the Court of Appeals had to do to revive this lawsuit. Today we look at the Firearms Policy Coalition's amicus brief to this matter which truly outlines the massive danger associated with this lawsuit. When you concider the potential fallout if the manufacturers do not prevail, this is, in fact the most important 2A battle ongoing right now. So learn more and arm yourself with education today.

Gov Alia sets up judicial panel to investigate Ortom's use of State funds #news #covid #breakingnews #trending #sport #latestnews #dailynews #updates #memes #newsupdate

Gov Alia sets up judicial panel to investigate Ortom's use of State funds #news #covid #breakingnews #trending #sport #latestnews #dailynews #updates #memes #newsupdate

Dear @NYCMayor Eric Adams, For the past seven years, Jews have been the number one target of hate crimes in New York City 2023: 49% of hate crimes were against Jews 2022: 43% of hate crimes were against Jews 2021: 38% of hate crimes were against Jews 2020: 44% of hate crimes were against Jews 2019: 58% of hate crimes were against Jews 2018: 53% of hate crimes were against Jews 2017: 46% of hate crimes were against Jews No, "we are not OK". We haven't been OK for a while. Data: nyc.gov/site/nypd/stat…

The assault weapons ban results : Objective The aim of this study was to determine if the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (FAWB) (1994-2004) reduced the number of public mass shootings while it was in place. https://lnkd.in/ggt5rnxm

Supreme Court Rules 8:1 Gun Law Implications Lawsuits that challenge gun laws that are based on the Second Amendment could have implications following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dillia v. Texas The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not provide compensation for actions like confiscation or destruction of firearms although cases argue that this violates the Clause. Takings Violations The lack of clarity in the wording of proceedings means that those looking to argue takings violations when challenging state gun control laws may prove challenging. This could span bans on assault weapons, restrictions on magazine capacity, and requirements for firearm registration.

It was a pleasure to co-author this article with the partners, David Morriss, Evangelos Catsambas and Antonis Lagadianos of LCI Law, having recently advised a shipowner on whether to heed an order to proceed through the Red Sea despite the Houthi attacks. We investigate what's required to invoke the BIMCO wartime clauses, given the decisions in the Triton Lark, Paiwan Wisdom and the recent Supreme Court decision in the Polar. Of particular interest to shipping lawyers will be the Supreme Court's commentary that both The Product Star and The Paiwan Wisdom remain good law. It had previously been thought by some in the shipping community that The Paiwan Wisdom removed, generally, the need for owners to show that the relevant war risks must have escalated since the date of the charterparty in order to invoke them, as first laid down by the Court of Appeal in The Product Star. That is too general a statement - the important question is what did the parties expressly agree to, and would reliance on the BIMCO wartime clauses be inconsistent with the parties' contractual bargain. In short, the BIMCO wartime clauses are not a 'get out of jail free' card. #commercial #shipping

SPU Sport Court TIGHT STRUCTURE EXCELLENT REBOUND WATERBORNE SURFACE EXCELLENT CHEMICAL PROPERTIES EXCELLENT UV RESISTANCE EXCELLENT FRICTION PERFORMANCE