I help connect contract management and legal experts with the world's leading and fastest growing construction, renewables and real estate companies, building long-term talent acquisition and retention strategies 🚀
Contract Managers in the construction and infrastructure industries do not exclusively, but often come from a quantity surveying, engineering, or legal background 🤷♂️ When companies are recruiting they sometimes consider which one makes the best Contract Manager? Many times they already have an opinion. From the hundreds of clients that we've supported to the thousands of candidates we've interviewed, we have (I hope) a good base knowledge on the subject, so is there is an argument to say that those with diverse qualifications and/or experiences are a more attractive candidate to recruit? For instance, a lawyer who has become a contract manager will be strong with legal and risk management, they will know their way around a contract, but can a legalistic approach possibly reduce the focus on cost? When you reverse the situation, those from a quantity surveyor background will be strong with cost estimation, budgeting, and financial control, but would this then mean that legal intricacies are maybe missed? What if that lawyer spent time on site and then undertook qualifications in Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification or civil engineering as well as courses in cost and financial planning? And the quantity surveyor completed an LLM in construction law and arbitration and joined the The Society of Construction Law or the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation? Would that then make those contract managers more recruitable and better in the eyes of the hiring manager ❓ Regardless of any one opinion, these are often the points that clients consider when recruiting and qualifying suitable talent. In fact, more and more are going through skill gap analysis and seeking contract managers with diversity. They are even diversfying the make up of their departments so all three backgrounds exist and complement each other for the betterment of projects and the overall business. I would love to hear your thoughts and experiences on this 👂 (I will caveat this to say that diverse backgrounds are not always needed - if a project/company needs a contract manager who is an engineer, then it is an engineer it needs. The circumstances behind the role will dictate this). #quantitysurveyor #engineer #lawyer #legal #contractmanagement #construction #infrastructure #international
A professional with diverse academic background and experience is usually preferred, provided that he/she has sufficient relevant exposure to those diverse disciplines. Otherwise there will be an imbalance inclining towards one particular area. I would qualify that this is an ideal situation. When your company has a wide portfolio of projects, these cannot be handled efficiently by a singular professional no matter how good he/she might be.
But it has been seen that an Engineer with Law course is better Contract Manager to adapt the requirement of technical and legal. From the past experience in India, it has been seen that many valid claims were rejected in Arbitration due to limitation, becoz the Contract Manager was not aware.
Hi John, yes, all that your comments cover are very relevant. The procurement of staff and experience is essentially no different to procurement of any other object or resource. Write a comprehensive (or target) specification of what is needed to be fully functional, examine what may be available in the market to fill the needs However, unlike a machine or piece of equipment consider the nature, character and experience the resource being considered possesses or is missing. The real benchmatk or guideline for selection in my view will be how does the person apply its knowledge and experience in practice, in documents, in meetings formal or casual How do they approach problem solving both from creating a plan from a blank sheet or will fit into situations already controlling or preventing movement in a better direction or be able to assist reaching, the more preferred direction to achieve the desired result?
John, In my experience from the recruiter and the candidate position, I find that recruiting should always consider do you want, need, a high potential individual or a high performing individual because the cost of either will be quite different What impact could or will that candidate be able to deliver on appointment, with further learning of more developed skills, mentoring or coaching and have higher potential.
One who understands all those issues (legal, contracts, costs, schedule, resources, project management, safety, priorities of client, among others) must be a good candidate.
Facts knowledge will come operational knowledge and Engineering or QS qualifications and law i.e. contract knowledge will be deepen from proper law degree. So, combination of both qualifications will be ideal. However, it can vary as per employer requirements and Candidate's skills.
I feel his opinion matters!!! However anybody can become contract manager or into arbitration but they should have the clear capability of understanding “NATURAL JUSTICE “.
Absolutely! 🌟 Supporting a great cause with amazing individuals is truly commendable. Your involvement ma
Owen Hayford though this is not new and still an opinion can be made
Director, Contract and Commercial Advisory hos K2 Management
8moI have 2 lawyers, 2 quantity surveyors and an engineer in my team. One of the lawyers is from an engineering background. I find the balance gives us the ability to leverage our collective skills for the benefit of our clients, and we are best positioned to offer tailored solutions to their current needs.