Eve Pearman’s Post

View profile for Eve Pearman, graphic

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Consultant at PwC | Co-Chair of PwC UK's Gender Balance Network | UnderOne DEI Rising Star Shortlisted

Over the weekend, I had the pleasure of hearing The Hon. Julia Gillard AC speak at Hay Festival. Julia discussed her impactful misogyny speech (if you don't know the speech you should absolutely give it a listen https://lnkd.in/eUbDTMku ), our glacial progress in advancing women in leadership, and her work with the King's Global Institute for Women's Leadership. Julia shared findings from a recent study by the King's Global Institute for Women’s Leadership, revealing a growing gender divide among Gen Z regarding views on masculinity and women's equality. Notably, Gen Z men are nearly twice as likely as Gen Z women to believe that feminism has done more harm than good. https://lnkd.in/ejFdXCi3 There was once a consensus that DEI in the workplace would naturally improve as younger, more progressive individuals joined the workforce. However, recent research such as the above and public debates indicate that we remain as, if not more, divided along lines of identity. With Gen Z poised to become the largest workforce demographic by 2030, these divides could increasingly manifest in the workplace. If not proactively addressed, they could hinder DEI progress and negatively impact business outcomes. Julia suggested that a lack of men's inclusion in the feminist movement might have contributed to this divide. This (perceived or real) exclusion is reflected in workplace DEI efforts, where interventions often focus on specific identities, inadvertently excluding others. Organisations are finding this reflected in employee sentiment, with a growing push back on targeted interventions and feelings of exclusion by those unable to access them. As DEI professionals, we need to consider how to bridge these divides and prioritise systemic interventions that promote fairness and equitable outcomes. Is it time to make inclusion more inclusive? I'm interested to hear if you're seeing similar trends in your workplace. How is this affecting your DEI initiatives and programs? Sarah Minor-Massy Olivia Jervis #DiversityandInclusion #GenderEquality #DiversityEquityandInclusion #InclusionMatters

Jim Nicholls ⚡️

Edtech Entrepreneur, Board Level & Senior Leadership Headhunter in Technology Sector, School Governor

4mo

You explicitly state the goal of ‘equitable outcomes’ - that is a pretty draconian order. Do you really think this is both possible or desirable? Should we have 50/50% of men and women in both child care and bricklaying? Should we demand that woman take their 50% share of work place fatalities (currently 93% men) The only way to achieve ‘equity’ is through quotas and compulsion. Men and women are more similar than they different. But at either end of the bell curves there is always a high concentrations of either one of the other. Be it height, aggression, intelligence or physical strength. DEI needs to start a process of negotiating with the reality of biology and making sensible compromises. Otherwise it will continue to lose trust and traction. What say you Tanya de Grunwald ?

Larice Stielow

Sustainability/ESG Strategy & Impact

4mo

I saw her give a similar speech of IWD - some really scary stats!

Ragini Prasad

🌍 Existential Detective - Regenerative Changemaker | 🔄 Advancing Circular Economy & Systemic Evolution | ✨ Cultivating Conscious Ecosystems for Holistic Prosperity | Guiding the Emergence of a Thriving Planet

4mo

I was a big fan of the former Prime Minister The Hon. Julia Gillard AC and her speech on misogyny was fantastic and so needed. However, my perspective shifted after learning about the amendments made to the sex discrimination act under her leadership, which significantly blurred the definitions of sex categories. This has opened up a real can of worms at largely womens expenses. Addressing misogyny requires a clear understanding of what a woman is, along with setting boundaries to protect women's spaces and rights. By prioritizing gender identity over biological sex, we've inadvertently weakened the very structures designed to protect women. The implementation of self-ID laws has been especially problematic, forcing women to accept anyone who identifies as a woman into our spaces putting us in danger. The findings of the Cass Review, further highlights the harm of this ideology on young girls and yet many including the former prime minister has not addressed this. DEI is experiencing its dark night of the soul right now and the only way out of it is to own up to mistakes made. We are all flawed and make mistakes, but owning up to them is a true mark of character. https://youtu.be/uI7euR0J1es?si=1zoqtaniOeMvND3q

Sarah Minor-Massy

Behavioural Scientist, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Consultant

4mo

Couldn’t agree more and have been contemplating how to operationalise this over the past few years - it can be very tricky to be more practically inclusive of majority groups without seeming to diminish the legitimate needs of the minority groups, for whom the DEI approach was meant to level the very unequal playing field. I always end up coming back to equalised parental leave - just as we’ve learned that extending the same leave to non-birthing parents (historically men) has made a huge difference to both men AND women, we need to apply this same principle to DEI efforts more broadly. Would welcome specific thoughts/ideas from the community on this. For a start, our DEI language and narrative need to be more inclusive of everyone. That’s the one thing I know for sure!

Mike Lee

Founder @ Outlier

4mo

Best communicator at the Hay festival (sorry Rory)

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics