The Soering doctrine and its historical significance while incorporating it into our mission of making law more accessible and simpler. The Soering doctrine refers to a legal principle established by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Soering v. United Kingdom in 1989. The case involved a German national named Jens Soering, who was accused of murder in the United States. Soering argued that if he were extradited to the U.S., he would face the death penalty, which he claimed would violate his rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights recognized that extradition to a country where an individual might face the death penalty could constitute a violation of the Convention's prohibition on torture and inhuman or degrading treatment. This landmark decision established the Soering doctrine, which prevents extradition to countries where an individual's human rights may be at risk. In the context of our mission to make law accessible and simpler, the Soering doctrine highlights the importance of understanding legal principles and how they can impact individuals' rights. By breaking down complex legal cases like Soering v. United Kingdom, we aim to provide clear explanations that help young people grasp the significance of legal decisions and their implications. Through Dialogue, we strive to empower individuals with the knowledge and understanding they need to navigate the legal landscape. By making legal concepts, cases, and doctrines more accessible and simpler, we can ensure that everyone can engage in informed discussions and contribute to the development of a just and fair society. If you want to stay updated with our informative content and be part of our mission, don't forget to subscribe to Dialogue today! By subscribing, you'll receive regular updates, insightful articles, and valuable resources that will enhance your legal knowledge and understanding. So, let's continue on our mission of making law more understandable and accessible to all! Subscribe today and join the Dialogue community. #Founder #SoeringDoctrine #LegalKnowledge #AccessibleLaw #SimplifiedLaw #EmpoweringYouth #SubscribeToday
dialogue’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
✊ Progressive Lawyers, It's Time to Strategize! ✊ We're at a pivotal moment where our individual efforts, though commendable, are not enough. The Right's strategic advantage in legal matters is clear but not permanent. We must rise to meet this challenge. Our webinar series is a call to action: unite to build social movement power and defend our democracy from an authoritarian power grab. During this first webinar, you’ll hear from: 1️⃣ Max Elbaum, a prolific author and longtime movement organizer, who will help us situate today’s crisis in a longer historical arc. 2️⃣ Linda Burnham, a strategist par excellence, who will offer crucial insights into the mechanics and power-building potential of grassroots organizing. Register today for the first two sessions: 1️⃣Why Progressive Lawyers Must Join the Pro-Democracy Fight: Understanding Today’s Authoritarian Crisis (Feb. 23) 2️⃣Getting in Formation: How Lawyers Should Orient to the Movement Against Authoritarianism (Mar. 22) 🔗 Register for sessions 1 & 2 here: https://lnkd.in/eZkT2fhQ #InclusiveDemocracy #LegalActivism
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Reframing justice – talking differently In October, immediate past-president Lubna Shuja outlined the work the Law Society has been doing in partnership with FrameWorks UK – a not-for-profit research organisation which specialises in communicating about social issues in ways that create change – for our Reframing Justice programme. Find out more here - https://lnkd.in/eMzjSVw6 #law #lawsociety #justice
Reframing justice – talking differently
lawgazette.co.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Another important article for legal professionals. Bar leaders take note!
We are grateful to Lawyers Defending American Democracy volunteer Jamie Conrad for his meticulous work for LDAD. One of his projects has been his research and writing about why State bar associations can (and should) play a role in protecting democracy and the rule of law. This article, published in Bloomberg Law, further makes the case that lawyers have an important role to play, and that a recent Fifth Circuit Court decision does not suggest otherwise.
Mandatory Bars Can Still Speak Out for Rule of Law After Decision
news.bloomberglaw.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Former HCA justice Michael Kirby argues for a federal human rights act... Here are three highlights from today's newsletter on Australian law: 1) The Australian reports that Brittany Higgins has engaged Rachel Young SC to appear for her in the defamation action brought by Linda Reynolds. Young has a BA (Hons) (2004) and LLB (Hons) from the University of Western Australia and a Masters of International Law from New York University School of Law (2012). She joined the WA bar in 2017 and was appointed Senior Counsel in 2022. 2) In a recent opinion piece former High Court justice Michael Kirby has set out why he thinks there should be a federal human rights act. He has said that a federal human rights act is "is precisely the tool Australia needs to ensure that parliament is held to account for upholding human rights, and to give people access to justice in case their rights are violated or simply ignored". 3) Emerita Professor Anne Twomey in her latest Youtube video has discussed some of the potential constitutional difficulties in SA's proposal to largely ban political donations. She notes that the public funding arrangements under the proposed scheme arguably favour incumbent candidates and therefore may be found invalid (see for example Australian Capital Telivision Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106). A link to the video is in today's newsletter. Liked this content? These were three highlights from today’s newsletter on Australian law. Visit headnote.com.au to subscribe to our free daily email newsletter. #auslaw #law #australianlawyer #legalnews
Headnote
headnote.com.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
JUSTICE Under Scrutiny: A Legal Conundrum Unfolds in EDOMEX 🇲🇽⚖️ In a case that has gripped the State of Mexico (Edomex), Judge Juan Manuel Alejandro Martínez Vitela found himself at the center of a storm of public outcry. The controversy erupted following his decision to absolve an individual accused of sexually abusing a four-year-old girl, citing the child's inability to provide precise details about the time and location of the alleged assault. This ruling, grounded in technicalities, has ignited debates on the adequacy of the legal system in protecting the most vulnerable. The Ripple Effect: Community Outrage and Judicial Review 🌊 The decision not only provoked frustration from the victim's mother, who passionately appealed for empathy and a reconsideration of the verdict but also led to widespread indignation across social platforms. A snippet of the court proceedings, shared widely online, has brought the case under intense public scrutiny, raising critical questions about the intersection of legal technicalities and the pursuit of justice. In response to the ensuing media attention and public demand for accountability, the State of Mexico's Judicial Power has announced an investigation into Judge Vitela's conduct. This inquiry aims to ensure transparency and fairness in the legal process, echoing the community's call for a judicial system that upholds the rights and dignity of every individual, especially the young and defenseless. Navigating the Path Forward: A Quest for Justice 🚀 As this case unfolds, it serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing challenges within legal frameworks and the imperative for a justice system that balances legal principles with empathy and a deep-seated commitment to protecting the innocent. The community's response highlights a collective aspiration for a legal system that not only adheres to the letter of the law but also embodies its spirit in safeguarding the most vulnerable among us. This situation continues to develop, and it underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue, reform, and vigilance in ensuring that justice is both served and seen to be served. The eyes of Edomex and beyond remain fixed on this case, hopeful for resolutions that reinforce faith in the legal system and its capacity to serve as a bastion of protection and rectitude. #JusticeForTheInnocent #EdomexCase #LegalSystemReform #ChildProtection #JudicialAccountability #SocialOutrage #EmpathyInJustice #TransparencyInCourt #LegalEthics #PublicScrutiny
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Celebrating Law Day 2024: A Commitment to Justice and Democracy Today, on May 1st, we observe Law Day—a time to recognize and honor the essential role of law and the legal process in our democracy. It’s a day to reflect on our shared commitment to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and the rule of law that form the bedrock of our society. 📜🔍 At ACC-St. Louis, Law Day holds special significance. Our members, comprising in-house counsel from diverse sectors, are at the forefront of advocating for the rule of law, ensuring businesses operate ethically and within legal frameworks. 🏛️✨ As we celebrate Law Day, let's discuss and share insights on how the law continues to shape our lives and our work. How are you marking this important day in your professional community? #ACCSTL #LawDay2024 #LegalExcellence #Democracy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Check out our latest information sheet on UNCRC and Children in Conflict with the Law - https://lnkd.in/eYpX6AkJ
Info Sheet 115 - May 24
cycj.org.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
My latest piece for Capital Daily has national implications. The provincial government in British Columbia is expected to introduce legislation this spring that will consolidate the oversight of legal services provided by lawyers, paralegals, and notaries under a single regulator. The government argues the consolidation will enhance public confidence and access to justice. Critics, however, question whether it prioritizes public interest over government control. The proposed changes raise broader governance and regulatory concerns, touching on the role of lawyers in defending public interests against government actions and lawyers are concerned about what the impact the proposed statute will have on the profession's independence. They argue that self-regulation is essential for upholding fundamental principles of justice and democratic values. #bcpoli #law #democracy
Attorney general motion puts democracy on trial
capitaldaily.ca
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Fantastic blog from Alison Reid Clan Childlaw on Access to Justice and the need for urgent action on the provision of lawyers for children. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has announced its next General Comment will be on Children's Right to Access to Justice and Effective Remedy. This is particularly important as Scotland prepares for the commencement of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act later this year. The Act explicitly references General Comments as a key tool for interpreting the UNCRC, underscoring their importance in shaping policy and practice. The Committee has already highlighted the need to ensure legal representation for children in the child justice system as a priority area for Scotland. The current system isn’t compliant with ECHR or UNCRC. The practical impact of this issue is staggering. In 2022/23 only 25% of the 2,637 children referred on offence grounds had legal representation - leaving around 1,875 children unrepresented in the system. Clan Childlaw has been working with the Scottish Parliament to propose solutions through the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill. However, the window for amendments is closing as the Bill progresses to its final stage and the Scottish Government has not yet committed to making the necessary changes to ensure all children referred on offence grounds have legal representation. Urgent action is needed.
✍ In this blog, Clan Childlaw's Principal Solicitor & Chief Executive, Alison Reid discusses the announcement of the next General Comment by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child & the gaps in current provisions in Scotland. Please have a read & share below. 👇 https://lnkd.in/dh-Ta7cH
New UNCRC General Comment will focus on Access to Justice & is a wake up call for Scotland
https://www.clanchildlaw.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
✍ In this blog, Clan Childlaw's Principal Solicitor & Chief Executive, Alison Reid discusses the announcement of the next General Comment by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child & the gaps in current provisions in Scotland. Please have a read & share below. 👇 https://lnkd.in/dh-Ta7cH
New UNCRC General Comment will focus on Access to Justice & is a wake up call for Scotland
https://www.clanchildlaw.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
100% 👩⚖️