Yesterday, the California Supreme Court decided John's Grill v. Hartford, a COVID-related insurance case in which the court, as Law360 put it, "reversed an appellate court's finding that a virus endorsement rendered a restaurant's policy illusory in a coverage dispute with a Hartford entity over pandemic-related losses, instead ruling that the endorsement clearly provides coverage 'only if the virus results from certain specified causes of loss.'"
COVID-related litigation has taken many curious twists and turns.
The COVID-related cases I have mediated have come in many shapes and sizes. Some business interruption/insurance cases have involved whether lockdown orders from multiple government jurisdictions constitute multiple occurrences, or only one occurence because there was only one pandemic. Others have involved issues as diverse as whether lockdown orders trigger "force majeure" clauses in commercial leases, which can differ widely and require close textual and factual analysis.
What's your experience? What COVID-related cases are still going strong in your practice? What's next on the horizon for COVID-related litigation, in or out of the business interruption/insurance world?
Tireless Ruthlessly Competent Insurance Defense Counsel
3moI don’t think tremendous is strong enough of a word here. These two legal power houses are unstoppable.