City of Marietta’s Post

While the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, exceptions exist in Illinois law. Police can search your home without a warrant in specific situations: Consent 🤝✅: If you willingly grant permission, a warrant becomes unnecessary. Be mindful of your right to refuse consent. Exigent Circumstances 🚨🔄: In emergencies, like the risk of evidence destruction or imminent danger, police may bypass the warrant requirement. Plain View Doctrine 👀🚪: If incriminating evidence is in plain view during a legal entry, police can act without a warrant. Understanding these exceptions empowers you to safeguard your rights. Stay informed. 🏡🔍 #KtenasLaw #KtenasBrothers #SearchWarrantExceptions #LegalInsights

It is strongly advised not to engage in any form of conflict with traffic police or law enforcement officers under any circumstances, including situations where influencers or other external parties may encourage such behavior. Engaging in conflicts with authorities can result in serious legal consequences and exacerbate the situation unnecessarily. It is always best to remain calm, respectful, and compliant with the instructions given by law enforcement officials. If there are grievances or disputes, these should be addressed through proper legal channels and not through confrontations.

New Law Regarding Removal of Unauthorized Persons "Squatters" What kind of case should you file when you need to have someone removed from your home? There were three types of cases to be filed prior to a legislative change effective July 1st, 2024. Each type of case has been defined, as well as the 4th type established this year. Remember that, as Clerks, we do not provide legal advice, however, we may provide appropriate court-approved forms or information to assist you. #CollierClerk #CrystalKinzel #TheClerksReport #Newsletter

It's utterly appalling that this case has dragged on for over three years, with the latest postponement pushing the trial out by another year. The delay, purportedly due to the NSW Police's eleventh-hour disclosure of crucial material, raises serious questions about the efficacy and fairness of the investigative and legal processes involved. How can we trust a system that hampers timely justice, not only burdening the courts but also leaving those accused in a prolonged state of limbo? This is not just an inconvenience; it's a failure of justice that impacts all parties involved. Everyone deserves a swift and fair trial—what happened to the principle of justice being delivered without undue delay? This situation reeks of inefficiency and a startling disregard for one of our most fundamental legal rights. https://lnkd.in/giFbUYdS

ON BREACH OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - Whether there are consequences for employing the Police or any enforcement agency to violate the fundamental rights of a citizen "...See also Iwununne Vs Egbuchelem & Ors (2016) LPELR - 40515 (CA); Anogwie & Ors Vs Odom & Ors (2016) LPELR - 40214 (CA) and Ogbonna Vs Ogbonna (2014) 23 WRN 48, to the effect that a party who employs the Police or any law enforcement agency to unlawfully act or violate the fundamental rights of a citizen, should be ready to face the consequences, either alone or with the misguided law enforcement personnel, who compromised his office/position."

https://lnkd.in/dM_puJiF _____________ kinds of F.I.R . Some important types are following: General F.I.R.: General F.I.R. is a F.I.R. logged by the aggrieved party or by the first party against another party in general transactions in the nearest police station. ... Zero F.I.R.: ... Cross F.I.R: ... Multiple F.I.R:

Can Cops Demand ID? 4th Amendment Explained! Join SPEAKER_00 as they delve deep into the intricacies of the 4th Amendment and legal precedents that shape our rights. Explore landmark cases like Brown v. Texas and Heibel v. 6th Judicial District Court, unraveling the tension between identification laws and civil liberties. Don't miss this essential legal insight! #FourthAmendment #LegalPrecedents #CivilRights #SupremeCourt #BrownvTexas #HeibelCase #LawEducation #UnderstandingLaw #LegalInsights #CitizenRights

This message from the Justice minister is misleading in my opinion. Why is the presumption that the law is being incorrectly applied? How about acknowledging that the risk assessment for bail is based on law but offers no guarantees as to whether an individual will reoffend or not. We start from the presumption of innocence and our charter protected right to reasonable bail, and then assess the plans and submissions from counsel.