CAIDP Europe congratulates the Dutch Government and supervisory authorities for their transparency Re. shaping AI governance in the Netherlands. Some key takeaways from the second advice of the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch DPA) and the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur to the Dutch Government on the EU AI Act supervisory structure in the Netherlands: ✅ Are involved not only ministries in charge of economic affairs or digitalisation but the Justice ministry as well. 👉 good practice taking into consideration that the EU AI Act is about managing risks and harms to fundamental rights 👉 these ministries do cover consumer protection ❓ Why are the ministries of social affairs and employment or the ministry of education not involved? Employment and education are key fields covered by the EU AI Act. ✅ Involvement of 22 supervisory agencies 👉 coordination among supervisory authorities is key to effective application & enforcement of the EU AI Act ✅ Proposed market surveillance authority in most fields: the AI Unit of the Dutch DPA. 👉 the Dutch DPA is an INDEPENDENT supervisory authority GDPR on independence is more protective than EU AI Act 👉 Can build on the expertise already acquired by the Dutch DPA (automated decision-making / algorithmic transparency under GDPR) and ensure direct coordination within the Dutch DPA. Moving forward, we might see an integration of the GDPR data protection impact assessments within the AI Act risk management matrix ⚠ The Dutch DPA.AI and other supervisory authorities involved should get the necessary human resources and financial means to carry their mission effectively ⚠ The Dutch DPA.AI should be the designated Dutch rep. within the European AI Board 👉 Effective enforcement of the AI Act requires for the same supervisory authority to ensure external coordination with other EU member states' market surveillance authorities and internal coordination with other Dutch supervisory authorities ⚠ full transparency requires public consultation on the Dutch AI governance framework For more news, check out https://www.caidp.eu/ Giuliano Borter Center for AI and Digital Policy Marc Rotenberg Rose Boutboul Natali Helberger Yelyzaveta (Lisa) Markova Jan-Jaap Oerlemans Stefan Roolvink M. Konrad Borowicz Gizem Yardımcı Alexander Laufer Zelal B. Iris Muis Esther Keymolen Brend P. Jurriaan Parie Sarah E. Gerald Hopster Emaediong Akpan Eleni Kosta Eleni Metanoia Evelien Brouwer Elena Kukovica Oskar J. Gstrein Mirko Tobias Schäfer Cosimo Monda Gijs van Dijck Panos DelimatsisEduard Fosch Villaronga Catelijne Muller Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius Sven Stevenson Roel Dobbe Jef Ausloos Sofia Ranchordas
A month after the European ministers voted in favour of the AI Act we have published our advice to the Dutch government on the supervision of AI! The advice has been prepared by the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Dutch DPA) and the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur (RDI) in collaboration with the other 20 Dutch supervisory authorities who may play a role in the supervision of AI. With this joint vision on a national supversory structure for AI, Dutch supervisors are leading the way in Europe. For more than a year, Dutch supervisory authorities have been jointly preparing for the supervision of AI. After a year of preparation with my colleagues at the supervisory authorities, and in particular my direct colleagues Stefan Kulk and Sven Stevenson, the publication of this advice is a real milestone. Read the English version below and read the Dutch version here: https://lnkd.in/eH3kSJJZ
