Banking Risk and Regulation’s Post

🔍 Amid the recent sound and fury over timelines and thresholds of reimbursing victims of authorised push payment fraud, the most significant issue around is being overlooked: preventing the scam in the first place, writes Nicky Goulimis of Tunic Pay. 💡 The debate sparked by the UK regulator’s decision to slash maximum fraud reimbursements from £415,000 to £85,000 represents an opportunity, I believe, to align incentives to reduce losses with an improved customer experience. 💸 What has been under-reported is that banks and fintechs will still have to pay a not-insignificant bill. Research by the Payment Systems Regulator has found that the lower threshold will still cover more than 99 per cent of APP fraud cases by volume, and the remainder of cases will simply be redirected to the Financial Ombudsman Service for further remediation. 🤝 Rather than finger-pointing, the UK sector should focus on how information sharing can benefit both the industry and consumers, reducing fraud likelihood. Read more https://lnkd.in/emGQxQZH #APPFraud #AuthorisedPushPayments #Banking

APP fraud shouldn’t mean All Payments Pending - Banking Risk and Regulation

APP fraud shouldn’t mean All Payments Pending - Banking Risk and Regulation

bankingriskandregulation.com

I wanna know about time travel

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics