Activity
-
Hello everyone! I am about a month out from completing my internship at the Statler Hotel at Cornell University!! I have gained so much experience in…
Hello everyone! I am about a month out from completing my internship at the Statler Hotel at Cornell University!! I have gained so much experience in…
Liked by Caleb Sansoucy
-
Welcome to our 2021 Summer Associates! #ShearmanLaw #ShearmanCareers #Summer2021
Welcome to our 2021 Summer Associates! #ShearmanLaw #ShearmanCareers #Summer2021
Liked by Caleb Sansoucy
Experience
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Education
-
Vanderbilt University Law School
-
Activities and Societies: Dean’s List; Moot Court Board Managing Council - Associate Justice for the Intramural Competition; Phi Delta Phi; Criminal Law Teaching Assistant; Mock Trial; American Constitution Society Treasurer; Labor and Employment Law Society; Hugh Jackson Morgan Scholarship; Chancellor’s Scholarship.
-
-
Activities and Societies: Phi Beta Kappa; Dean’s List (every semester); Patterson Scholar; Outstanding Graduating Senior in Economics; Award for Academic Excellence in German 2016 & 2018; Phi Kappa Phi; Delta Phi Alpha (German Honor Society)
-
-
Study Abroad
Explore more posts
-
The Bianchi Law Group, LLC
🚨 Understanding Warrant vs. Summons Complaints in New Jersey 🚨 In this video, BLG partner Robert Bianchi, Esq. discusses the critical differences between a warrant and a summons complaint in New Jersey. Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when facing the complexities of criminal charges. One question that frequently arises is the difference between a warrant and a summons complaint. Bob breaks down these terms, explaining that a summons complaint, identifiable by an 'S' number, allows the accused to be free post-complaint issuance. On the other hand, a warrant complaint, marked with a 'W', signifies a more severe scenario where the accused is detained, photographed, and fingerprinted. This video is essential for anyone seeking clarity on these processes or facing such circumstances -> https://lnkd.in/ez4tP5sx Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. 👨⚖️ Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? 📲 Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #NewJersey 🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato
7 Comments -
Ulrichsen Rosen & Freed LLC
Lepis v. Lepis: Change of Circumstances Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139 (1980), may be the most widely cited case in New Jersey family law. This case lays out a two step procedure by which courts in New Jersey must evaluate requests for the modification of spousal support and child support obligations. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/e8G3RJce #FamilyLaw #NewBeginnings #Journey #Lawyer #Divorced #Coparenting #Separation #Family #Law #DivorceLawyer #BreakUp #DivorceAttorney #womeninlaw #legal #prelaw #lawyersofinstagram #njlawyer #princetonlawyer #penningtonlawyer #princetonfamilylaw #princetondivorcelawyer #attorney #princetonattorney
-
New York Litigation Guide
New York Lawyers, Did You Know That: "A plaintiff’s burden to obtain a preliminary injunction is the same as that required for summary judgment." E.g., Do No Harm v. Pfizer, Inc., 96 F4th 106, 114 (2nd Cir. 2024). For more recent case law on New York preliminary injunctions, see The New York Litigation Guide's free and recently updated sample chapter on preliminary injunctions. #injunctions #newyorklaw #preliminaryinjunctions #temporaryinjunctions https://lnkd.in/g6tbX4dE
-
Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Two recent cases from the Delaware Supreme Court and Second Circuit Court of Appeals reach opposite conclusions when assessing whether pre-suit demand letters constitute claims under claims-made and claims-made-and-reported policies. Read our latest case alert by Michael A. Amato and Jeffrey J. Vita, as these cases serve as an important reminder for policyholders to be vigilant in notifying their insurers of any pre-suit claim, as the failure to do so may preclude coverage. #SDVLaw #CaseAlert #Claims #ClaimsMade #Policies #PreSuit #Insurance #Policyholders
4 Comments -
Employee Retention Credit (ERC / ERTC) IRS Tax Refund Services from Disaster Loan Advisors™
Massachusetts Attorneys, Lawyers, and Law Firms Employee Retention Credit in MA (updated 2024) https://lnkd.in/gr69Zf6N Key ERC Credit Takeaways: - ERC can be retroactively claimed: Legal firms may apply for past years. - Benefit extends through 2025: Firms can plan for future credit claims. - Legal sector is specifically eligible: Tailored advice for law practices. - Substantial credit amounts possible: Significant financial relief available. - Helps maintain employment levels: Incentive for retaining staff. Important 2024 and 2025 ERC Tax Credit Deadline: The 2020 ERC Credit Tax Year deadline of 4/15/24 has already passed. Good news? The opportunity to retroactively claim your business Employee Retention Credit for the prior 2021 Tax Year is still available, with a next year April 15, 2025 deadline. This really is your FINAL chance at any potential ERC tax credit refund! Not all businesses will qualify, as it depends on multiple factors per IRS Rules and Guidelines. You might be leaving significant financial relief on the table from past COVID harm to your business in 2021. In late 2023, the IRS had “temporarily” paused processing. You will still want to check eligibility and file now (if you qualify) because the IRS will resume processing tax credit claims in the order they are received. TAKE ACTION NOW IN 2024 DON’T WAIT! Since the IRS has over 1,000,000+ Quarterly 941-X tax forms in their processing queue, this has caused much longer delays in getting ERC Refund Checks for those that qualify. The IRS processes ERC Claims in the order they are received. If you haven’t previously filed for the ERC Credit, it is worth scheduling a phone call to explore your possible eligibility from the past 2021 business tax year. Again, not all businesses will qualify, but it’s worth a professional deep-dive evaluation. https://lnkd.in/dtr69VW9 #ERC #ERTC #EmployeeRetentionCredit #EmployeeRetentionTaxCredit #TaxCredit
-
Mazzola Lindstrom LLP
Key Ethical Considerations for Attorneys and Judges: What You Need to Know: In this recent article authored by the New York State Bar Association Attorney Professionalism Forum, Jean-Claude (JC) Mazzola, Hanoch Sheps, Esq., Katie O'Leary, and Vincent J. Syracuse dive into the complex ethical challenges attorneys face when approached by judges outside the courtroom for legal insights. Here are the top three takeaways: - Ex Parte Communications Are Prohibited: Judges are not permitted to engage in private communications regarding active cases without notifying all parties. This ensures transparency and fairness in judicial proceedings. - Attorneys Have a Limited Duty to Report: Under New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct, attorneys are generally not required to report judicial misconduct unless involved in an investigation. However, it’s critical for attorneys to maintain professional boundaries to uphold the integrity of the court. -Judicial Consultation with Legal Experts: Judges may seek advice from disinterested legal experts, but only if they follow the proper procedures, including notifying all parties involved and allowing responses to the advice given. This article sheds light on how both judges and attorneys must navigate these situations to maintain ethical standards. click here to read the full article: https://lnkd.in/e6viJFdF #LegalEthics #AttorneyEthics #JudicialConduct #NYSBA #MazzolaLindstrom
4 Comments -
Lynch & Owens, P.C.
Restraining orders can be a tricky thing in Massachuetts family law. It can be helpful, but can also be abused. Read on to see Attorney James M. Lynch examine the requirements of objectively reasonable fear and imminent harm in Massachusetts restraining order. https://lnkd.in/dZRjTTDX #MassachusettsLaw #FamilyLaw #RestrainingOrders #LegalAdvice #DomesticViolence #AttorneyLife #LegalTips
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore More