InjuryClaims.com

Tubi has agreed to settle a $19.99M class action lawsuit over alleged violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). If you used Tubi between June 23, 2021, and August 26, 2024, you could be eligible for compensation. Class members need to submit claims by November 28, 2024, by providing their registered account details or device information. #Tubi #PrivacySettlement #ClassAction #VPPA #Streaming

If you used a fingerprint-scan time clock or temperature scanner at Magid Glove’s Romeoville, Illinois facility between January 8, 2016, and August 30, 2024, you could be entitled to a settlement of up to $3,244.38. The settlement stems from allegations that Magid Glove violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting biometric data without proper disclosures. If you’re eligible, the deadline to file your claim is November 19, 2024. #BIPA #BiometricPrivacy #ClassAction #MagidGlove #IllinoisLegal

Change Healthcare and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina (BCBSNC) have agreed to a $1.67 million settlement to resolve a lawsuit over unwanted robocalls. The lawsuit claimed that Change Healthcare, operating under the brand My Advocate, made robocalls and prerecorded messages to people who weren’t BCBSNC subscribers or had opted out of receiving calls. 💡 Eligibility: Received robocalls or prerecorded messages from Change Healthcare on behalf of BCBSNC between January 10, 2019, and July 17, 2024. Not a BCBSNC subscriber or opted out of receiving such calls. 📅 Claim Deadline: December 2, 2024 📅 Final Approval Hearing: December 16, 2024 If you qualify, submit your claim to receive compensation from the settlement fund. #TCPA #ClassAction #BCBSNC #RobocallLawsuit #ConsumerRights

Condé Nast, the parent company of The New Yorker and Wired, is being sued for allegedly using trackers on its websites to collect user data without permission. The lawsuit claims the company shared users’ IP addresses with advertisers, violating California’s privacy laws. #DataPrivacy #ClassAction #CondeNast #DigitalPrivacy #CIPA

A Connecticut jury found J&J liable for causing a man’s mesothelioma, awarding $15 million in damages. The company plans to appeal, maintaining that its talc products are safe and asbestos-free. This verdict comes amid J&J’s efforts to resolve thousands of similar claims through a proposed $10 billion bankruptcy settlement. What are your thoughts on this verdict and J&J’s legal strategy? #TalcLawsuit #Mesothelioma #JJVerdict #LegalUpdate #CancerClaims

A lawsuit filed in Illinois accuses Peoples Auto Parking of unlawfully accessing personal data from DMV records using automated license plate recognition (ALPR) technology. The plaintiffs argue that parking citations were issued based on information obtained without consent, violating the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA). #PrivacyProtection #ClassAction #DPPA #LegalNews #ParkingCitations

Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) is accused of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act by improperly reporting late payments for homeowners who used COVID-19 forbearance plans. The lawsuit claims that SPS demanded lump-sum payments and damaged credit scores, even when homeowners were in compliance with the forbearance terms. #SelectPortfolioServicing #FCRA #CreditReport #MortgageForbearance #ClassAction #ConsumerProtection

Avis Rent A Car System LLC is facing legal action after a data breach exposed sensitive customer information, including names, driver's license numbers, and credit card details. The lawsuit claims that Avis failed to properly secure its data, putting customers at risk of identity theft. #Avis #DataBreach #Cybersecurity #ClassAction #LegalNews

Sprouts Farmers Market is under fire for allegedly misleading consumers by marketing its avocado oil as pure, despite it being mixed with cheaper oils like canola. The lawsuit claims these labeling practices are deceptive and seeks compensation for affected consumers. #Sprouts #AvocadoOil #ClassAction #FoodLabeling #ConsumerProtection #LegalNews

A major case is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court that will determine if unsolicited faxes sent to online fax services fall under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The Court's ruling could either limit or expand businesses' ability to send electronic faxes without legal risk. If the FCC’s current interpretation stands, businesses may have more freedom to send online faxes. But if the Court sides with the plaintiffs, companies could face increased liability for fax marketing practices. This decision will have major implications for businesses navigating the intersection of telemarketing rules and modern technology. Do you think online faxes should be treated the same as traditional faxes? #TCPA #SupremeCourt #FaxMarketing #Telemarketing #ConsumerProtection