FairPlay AI

🏠 Hey homeowners: When was the last time you checked the moss levels on your roof? If you haven’t recently, don’t worry — your insurance company’s drones probably did. Insurers today are using advanced aerial imagery to inspect every inch of your property, from aging shingles to overhanging tree limbs, all without ever setting foot on your lawn. These digital eyes in the sky are part of a broader trend toward ultra-precise risk assessment. Algorithms now process countless data points to determine premiums, promising a more personalized approach to underwriting. But with great data comes great responsibility. Connecticut’s Department of Insurance recently warned that while aerial technology might boost accuracy, it can also lead to unintended and potentially unfair consequences for homeowners. Amid an ongoing crisis in home insurance—driven by climate change, rising construction costs, and regulatory challenges in high-risk areas—advanced tech like aerial imaging and AI analysis offer insurers powerful tools to reduce costs and improve risk selection. But as states like Connecticut and New York remind us, alternative data and AI systems need to be used responsibly and within legal boundaries. With the right approach, this technology can lead to more accurate risk assessment AND fairer pricing. But to achieve that, we need to keep an eye on the roof—and an eye on the algorithms watching it.

Is your neighborhood tax assessor playing favorites? A new study on Philadelphia’s property tax fairness took a hard look at residential tax assessments — and, spoiler alert: It’s not all brotherly love in the City of Brotherly Love. 🏠💔 This study by the Reinvestment Fund dives deep into Philadelphia's 2023 residential taxes, and here’s what they found: Neighborhoods with higher percentages of Black, Hispanic, or low-income residents are more likely to experience: • Inaccurate assessments • Over-assessments • Under-assessment of high-value properties relative to low-value ones The study is a stark reminder that seemingly objective systems can hide biases that hit vulnerable communities the hardest. It’s also a clear call to cities across the country to take a hard look at their own assessment practices. If we can build AI that outsmart grandmasters at chess, surely we can design a system that fairly assesses property taxes — no matter the neighborhood.

How are leading sponsor banks and fintechs utilizing AI to serve their customers better? Discover cutting-edge insights from industry leaders and explore real-world case studies on AI's current and future deployment at the AI-Native Banking & Fintech Conference. Hear from experts: 🎙️Brian Brooks, Former Comptroller of the Currency 🎙️Kareem Saleh CEO of FairPlay AI 🎙️Walter J. Mix III, Former Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) 🎙️Dan Pillemer, CEO of CardWorks And many more! 🗓️ Date: October 7th 🕒 Time: 9 am -6 pm MT 📍 Where: The University of Utah, Salt Lake City Co-hosted with Utah Bankers Association, the Utah Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, and American Fintech Council! Don’t miss the chance to gain exclusive insights, share knowledge, and discuss innovative ideas with those who share your passion for advancing AI responsibly. 🎟️ Early bird tickets on sale now until September 15th: https://lnkd.in/gj964_X8 #GenerativeAI #ArtificialIntelligence #AINative #Banking #Fintech

Are We Building AI on Shaky Foundations? Imagine constructing a skyscraper without thoroughly vetting your materials. That's essentially what we've been doing in AI, according to a recent Nature Magazine study. (Link 👇 in the comments) Researchers introduced a novel framework to evaluate datasets used in biometrics and healthcare through three critical lenses: fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance. Fairness looks at how well a dataset represents diverse groups. It considers diversity (Does the dataset include a wide range of demographics?), inclusivity (Are all groups meaningfully represented?), and label reliability (How trustworthy is the attached information?). A fair dataset should reflect the rich tapestry of humanity, with accurate, self-reported descriptions. The privacy assessment asks whether datasets could potentially identify individuals or disclose sensitive information. Researchers checked for personal identifiers and sensitive attributes in the data. A high privacy score indicates minimal personal information, safeguarding individual identities. Regulatory compliance looks at whether the data was reviewed by an ethics board, if informed consent was obtained from participants, and whether there are mechanisms for data correction and deletion. A compliant dataset would tick all these boxes. The study analyzed 60 datasets, and the results are sobering: Fairness scores averaged a mere 0.96 out of 5. Our AI systems are learning from woefully unrepresentative data—like teaching a child about society using a book depicting only one type of person. Privacy scores were slightly better, but a "fairness-privacy paradox" emerged: To make datasets fairer, we often need more demographic data, but gathering more data can heighten privacy risks. Regulatory compliance scores were truly dismal, averaging just 0.58 out of 3. Many datasets lack even basic safeguards like institutional review board approval, individual consent, and mechanisms for data correction or deletion. The path forward? Researchers recommend: 1. Securing proper approvals and individual consent 2. Implementing mechanisms for data correction and deletion 3. Striving for diversity while safeguarding privacy 4. Developing comprehensive datasheets documenting dataset characteristics As we stand at the precipice of an AI-driven future, are we comfortable building our digital world on sand or should we take the time to lay a solid bedrock for the AI revolution? The choice is ours.

Does Your Grocery List Hold the Key to Your Credit Score? 🛒💳 Imagine a world where your love for fresh kale could give your credit score a boost, while that late-night ice cream run might actually hurt it. Sound far-fetched? Not according to a fascinating new study exploring the use of grocery data in credit decisions. (Hat tip to Jonathan Joshua for bringing this research to my attention!) Picture this: Two shoppers, Alice and Bob. Alice consistently buys fresh milk, beans, and vinegar dressings. She shops every Friday, spends similar amounts each trip, and is a savvy deal hunter. Bob, on the other hand, frequently purchases energy drinks and processed meats. His shopping trips are erratic, with wildly varying basket sizes. According to the study, Alice is more likely to pay her credit card bills on time than Bob—even after accounting for factors like income and traditional credit scores. Key findings that might make you rethink your grocery list: ➡ Healthier, Less Convenient Foods: Opting for raw ingredients over microwave meals is linked to more responsible payment behavior. ➡ Routines Matter: Consistent shopping habits, like sticking to the same shopping day and similar basket sizes, predict lower default risk. ➡ Deal-Seeking Pays Off: Shoppers who regularly take advantage of promotions tend to have better credit histories. This data could be transformative for the "credit invisible" — those who lack traditional credit scores. But it also opens a Pandora's box of ethical questions: 🔷 Fairness Concerns: Could using grocery data for underwriting unfairly penalize lower-income and marginalized shoppers who may not have access to fresh, healthy foods? 🔷 Ethical Dilemmas: Is it right to judge someone’s creditworthiness based on whether they buy cigarettes or junk food? 🔷Balancing Act: How do we weigh the benefits of financial inclusion against the privacy concerns of using such personal data? While the study acknowledges these challenges, it stops short of offering definitive answers. The next time you're in the grocery aisle, remember: your choices might be feeding more than just your appetite—they could be feeding your financial future.

Do lenders have to trade accuracy for fairness? "'This is the thorniest, most difficult question in algorithmic fairness right now,' said Kareem Saleh, founder and CEO of FairPlay AI, a company that conducts fairness testing on AI models. 'What you see in the impasse is actually two really thoughtful groups trying to grapple with this question.'" Read the full article here in American Banker:

Last week the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sent a spicy letter to the Treasury Secretary about AI in financial services. Here’s the scoop: First, if your business model depends on side-stepping a regulation, it’s an immediate red flag. Case in point: Earned Wage Access? Now treated as loans. Buy Now, Pay Later? Consider it a credit card. 🤖 Generative AI: The CFPB is giving it major side-eye, at least in consumer-facing applications. They're worried about misinformation, flimsy dispute resolution, and a Pandora's box of privacy and security risks. Handle with care! 🔍 Fairness First: The CFPB is cracking down on bias in everything from fraud detection to servicing, debt collection, and valuation models. They want regular testing for disparate treatment and impact. And they’re serious about searching for Less Discriminatory Alternatives (LDAs)—they mentioned it twice. 👀 ❌ RIP sandboxes and no-action letters.  No more regulatory relief for "innovative" companies.The CFPB says these programs “fell short of their intended purpose.” Apparently, waivers and approvals were misrepresented as stamps of endorsement. 🔓 Open Banking: The CFPB says competition should be based on product quality, not data lock-in. The future is open! 🛒 Comparison Shopping Tools: If you're displaying multiple offers to consumers and manipulating results, collecting kickbacks, or using dark patterns—be warned. The CFPB sees these practices as anti-competitive and potentially illegal. 📱 Big Tech Beware: If you’re a major player in digital wallets or payments—looking at you, Google, Apple, Samsung—get ready to be supervised like a bank. And whistleblowers? The CFPB wants to hear from them! In short, AI and Big Tech are squarely in the CFPB's sights. The message? Follow our rules, or face the music. https://lnkd.in/g-CMQp3D

At FairPlay, a key strength of our team lies in each individual’s wide set of experiences, from fine artists to nuclear engineers. We also strive to operate by one of our core values: doing your part to help create a society that works for everyone. This goal requires not just excellent mission-driven work but also service – to our customers, our communities, and our country. One of our team members, Adrian Lai, has embodied this value of service throughout his career. Since graduating from the Naval Academy, he has served multiple times abroad including in the Western Pacific and the Middle East. Now, Adrian once again has been called to serve his nation abroad. We honor his service and sacrifice, as well as the sacrifice of his family, while he is away.  We're proud to support team members like Adrian who answer the call to duty and reflect FairPlay’s values both at work and beyond. Good luck, Adrian. We eagerly await your safe return once your mission is complete.

Imagine: You're a public interest lawyer in rural Arkansas, the kind who spends their days battling predatory lenders, landlords and fighting for the forgotten. One day, calls start flooding in. Quadriplegics, individuals with severe cerebral palsy, and people who rely on in-home care for basic medical services all share the same chilling news: the state is cutting their lifeline – no more (or dramatically reduced) in-home medical care. When they ask why, the reply is a cold bureaucratic shrug: The computer said so. Without the benefit of in-home care, people develop painful conditions like bed sores, miss vital medical treatments, and are at higher risk of hospitalization. At a loss for what to do, you file suit against the state. Your argument? A reduction in home care without adequate explanation violates the constitutional right to due process. This isn't fiction. It's the real-life story of Kevin De Liban, a public interest attorney with Legal Aid of Arkansas who launched a David vs. Goliath battle against an unfeeling algorithm – and won. After years of litigation, in August 2023, The Arkansas Department of Human Services agreed to a historic settlement and to implement significant changes to the program, including providing explanations for algorithmic decisions that adversely affect consumers. This isn’t just a legal victory; it's a blueprint for change. Kevin is now launching Techtonic Justice, an organization that will train other public interest lawyers to fight for a future where technology empowers, not excludes. This vital initiative needs support. Kevin is raising funds to expand Techtonic Justice's reach and impact. So, hive mind, I need your help. What philanthropic organizations should Kevin turn to to support this important work and the launch of TechTonic Justice? You can read more about Kevin’s work and the lawsuits he’s filed in the links below. https://lnkd.in/gJt7JuaV https://lnkd.in/gzSZrn2u https://lnkd.in/gaaYtqEf

The news is out! FairPlay AI is partnering with LendingPoint™ to incorporate FairPlay’s Fairness-as-a-Service Solutions, thus enhancing LendingPoint's algorithmic qualification and automated funding decisions and furthering its mission of providing one-stop financing solutions for consumers and lending institutions. “LendingPoint takes a modern approach to credit by considering a broader range of factors to assess creditworthiness, focusing on an applicant’s complete financial picture,” said Shawn Stone, LendingPoint’s Chief Executive Officer. “We are excited to utilize FairPlay’s Fairness-as-as-Service solutions to help ensure our models continue to provide financing options fairly.” Read the full details here: