PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,5/10
1,2 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un estudiante de medicina se obsesiona con su amante infiel.Un estudiante de medicina se obsesiona con su amante infiel.Un estudiante de medicina se obsesiona con su amante infiel.
- Nominado a 1 premio BAFTA
- 2 nominaciones en total
Anthony Booth
- Martin
- (sin acreditar)
Terry Clinton
- Barmaid
- (sin acreditar)
May Cluskey
- Sister
- (sin acreditar)
Martin Crosbie
- Lab Technician
- (sin acreditar)
Alex Dignam
- Student
- (sin acreditar)
Michael Doolan
- Boy With Club Foot
- (sin acreditar)
Bryan Forbes
- Medical Student
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThis was something of a catastrophe for MGM. Filming began early in 1963, but Henry Hathaway resigned as director and Bryan Forbes, who had a prominent supporting role, did a week of directing before also leaving the film. He tried without success to have his credit as writer of the screenplay removed and was replaced as an actor by Jack Hedley. (However, Forbes can be glimpsed, more or less as an extra, in one or two scenes.) Ken Hughes finished the film and reportedly had a very bad time; the film was many months in the editing rooms and was not seen until late in 1964, nearly a year after its scheduled release date. It ran for only 99 minutes - a surprise, as the novel is about 800 pages. It was a commercial and critical disaster, being released in the UK on the lower half of a double-bill. It has only infrequently been seen since, even on TV.
- Citas
Nora Nesbitt: You're well out of it.
Philip Carey: Out of what?
Nora Nesbitt: Whatever you came here to forget.
- ConexionesFeatured in Hollywood and the Stars: In Search of Kim Novak (1964)
Reseña destacada
Not-bad third version of W. Somerset Maugham's depressing story about a sluttish waitress in London and the sensitive future doctor who becomes obsessed with her. Ravaged by critics upon its release (and thought bannable for a time for Kim Novak's suggestive scenes), this remake isn't a classic, nor does it improve on the Bette Davis version, but it does have something. Novak is just fine; Laurence Harvey also good as the smitten medico. The biggest problem is the screenplay's faithfulness to Maugham's plot, which by 1964 standards was pretty creaky. Why couldn't they have updated it just a bit? For all the talk about this version being "too shocking", the movie disappoints by not shocking at all, by playing it too safe. A soap opera, to be sure, though a handsome and interesting one. Novak-diehards will love the film, and her. **1/2 from ****
- moonspinner55
- 1 oct 2001
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- W. Somerset Maugham's of Human Bondage
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 3.815.000 US$
- Duración1 hora 40 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Servidumbre humana (1964) officially released in India in English?
Responde