Nataliya's Reviews > The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
by
Like many, I’ve read this book when I was a kid (twice actually, as a kid and a teen), and this was the first time I revisited it as a (hopefully) fully functional adult. And this time my reactions to it were quite magnified. The parts I liked before I loved now, and the parts that irked me in childhood now irritated the living daylights out of me.
Huckleberry Finn is a classic, and about half of it deserves that designation. Those are the parts where Twain shines — the parts with the mesmerizing and majestic Mississippi river, the ability to write injustice and abuse without proselytizing and falling into “misery porn” trap, and the sharp observation of the folks of the rural American South.
And then there are the parts when severe tonal dissonance kicks in and the whiplash of being in another book sets in. It first starts with a bit of annoyance in those endless “king” and “duke” chapters, but peaks at impressive rate once Tom Sawyer and his hijinks pop up. Tom Sawyer, who belongs in a kids book at best, whose overactive imagination in this situation is no longer cute but dangerous and cruel and incredibly thoughtless — and almost physically painful. (Yes, I know Tom Sawyer is supposed to come across as ridiculous here, but it went on for way too long).
Oh, and how bleak and pointlessly violent was the world of rural American South of the 1830? Sometimes I wonder if humanity really deserves to continue on. Yes, there are quite a few funny parts (Huck’s rant about Henry VIII many “achievements” - from Domesday book to malmsey wine drowning to Boston Tea Party comes to mind*), but my overall take this time is of resolutely grim life. Slavery, violence, alcoholism, cruelty, ignorance, disregard for rights of others - I need to stare at the wall for a little while now.
Being a novel of its time it doesn’t go where I wish it did, but even classics belong to their time, and this one is not an exception. And people needed to start like Huck — deciding that ”All right, then, I'll GO to hell” — because you have to start somewhere.
3.5 stars, and my brain is busily editing Tom Sawyer out of this story).
————
Buddy read with Nastya.
——————
Also posted on my blog.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
by
Nataliya's review
bookshelves: my-childhood-bookshelves, 2023-reads
May 02, 2010
bookshelves: my-childhood-bookshelves, 2023-reads
Read 2 times. Last read September 29, 2023 to October 5, 2023.
“Human beings can be awful cruel to one another.”
Like many, I’ve read this book when I was a kid (twice actually, as a kid and a teen), and this was the first time I revisited it as a (hopefully) fully functional adult. And this time my reactions to it were quite magnified. The parts I liked before I loved now, and the parts that irked me in childhood now irritated the living daylights out of me.
Huckleberry Finn is a classic, and about half of it deserves that designation. Those are the parts where Twain shines — the parts with the mesmerizing and majestic Mississippi river, the ability to write injustice and abuse without proselytizing and falling into “misery porn” trap, and the sharp observation of the folks of the rural American South.
“We catched fish and talked, and we took a swim now and then to keep off sleepiness. It was kind of solemn, drifting down the big, still river, laying on our backs looking up at the stars, and we didn’t ever feel like talking loud, and it warn’t often that we laughed – only a little kind of a low chuckle.”
And then there are the parts when severe tonal dissonance kicks in and the whiplash of being in another book sets in. It first starts with a bit of annoyance in those endless “king” and “duke” chapters, but peaks at impressive rate once Tom Sawyer and his hijinks pop up. Tom Sawyer, who belongs in a kids book at best, whose overactive imagination in this situation is no longer cute but dangerous and cruel and incredibly thoughtless — and almost physically painful. (Yes, I know Tom Sawyer is supposed to come across as ridiculous here, but it went on for way too long).
Oh, and how bleak and pointlessly violent was the world of rural American South of the 1830? Sometimes I wonder if humanity really deserves to continue on. Yes, there are quite a few funny parts (Huck’s rant about Henry VIII many “achievements” - from Domesday book to malmsey wine drowning to Boston Tea Party comes to mind*), but my overall take this time is of resolutely grim life. Slavery, violence, alcoholism, cruelty, ignorance, disregard for rights of others - I need to stare at the wall for a little while now.
* My favorite rant here, under spoiler tag for brevity sake:
(view spoiler)
Being a novel of its time it doesn’t go where I wish it did, but even classics belong to their time, and this one is not an exception. And people needed to start like Huck — deciding that ”All right, then, I'll GO to hell” — because you have to start somewhere.
3.5 stars, and my brain is busily editing Tom Sawyer out of this story).
————
Buddy read with Nastya.
——————
Also posted on my blog.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
PyranopterinMo
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 05, 2023 04:05PM
Hmm. I find, after many years or reading offbeat humor, that Twain is funnier than Monty Python or Discworld. Pls read what Mark Twain said about Jane Austen, (A Barkeeper Entering the Kingdom of Heaven”: Did Mark Twain Really Hate Jane Austen?) also Fenimore Cooper's litterary offences. An author should: "Say what he is proposing to say, not merely come near it." ( I call it the circling the drain.)
reply
|
flag
PyranopterinMo wrote: "Hmm. I find, after many years or reading offbeat humor, that Twain is funnier than Monty Python or Discworld. Pls read what Mark Twain said about Jane Austen, (A Barkeeper Entering the Kingdom of H..."
I need to reread some Twain humor (Huck Finn to me was not that humorous with few exceptions). I remember laughing to the point of crying in the past when I read his stories (the short story about riding a bike is the funniest and the truest story for all of us who ever struggled with that infernal machine).
I need to reread some Twain humor (Huck Finn to me was not that humorous with few exceptions). I remember laughing to the point of crying in the past when I read his stories (the short story about riding a bike is the funniest and the truest story for all of us who ever struggled with that infernal machine).
PyranopterinMo wrote: "I wanted to read this with English learners but the dialect ...."
Oh, that would be almost impossible! Because of the dialect, unless one is fluent in English, it’s better to read this novel in translation.
Oh, that would be almost impossible! Because of the dialect, unless one is fluent in English, it’s better to read this novel in translation.
Oh, great review! Gosh, I haven't seen someone read Twain in quite awhile, and it's been years since I read this. But, yeah, definitely remember being annoyed by Tom's antics in this one.
Amina wrote: "Oh, great review! Gosh, I haven't seen someone read Twain in quite awhile, and it's been years since I read this. But, yeah, definitely remember being annoyed by Tom's antics in this one."
Thanks, Amina! I definitely plan to revisit a few more books by Twain, probably his short stories. He’s a really good writer.
Thanks, Amina! I definitely plan to revisit a few more books by Twain, probably his short stories. He’s a really good writer.
Nataliya: I always think of Toni Morrison's take on Huck Finn: "The humiliation that Huck and Tom subject Jim to is baroque, endless, foolish, mind-softening--and it comes AFTER we have experienced Jim as an adult, a caring father and a sensitive man...Jim seems unassertive, loving, irrational, passionate, dependent, inarticulate (except for the "talks" he and Huck have, long sweet talks we are not privy to--but what did you talk about, Huck?). It is not what Jim seems that warrants inquiry, but what Mark Twain, Huck, and especially Tom need from him that should solicit our attention. In that sense the book may indeed by "great" because in its structure, in the hell is puts its readers through at the end, the frontal debate it forces, it simulates and describes the parasitical nature of white freedom."
Dan wrote: "Nataliya: I always think of Toni Morrison's take on Huck Finn: "The humiliation that Huck and Tom subject Jim to is baroque, endless, foolish, mind-softening--and it comes AFTER we have experienced..."
Very thought-provoking quote by Toni Morrison. Thanks so much for sharing it, Dan!
I’m pretty sure Tom Sawyer does not see Jim as a person (whether he really sees anyone is a person rather than actors in his constant internal immature roleplay is debatable anyway), and Huck is at very early stages of starting to realize that Jim is a person (very early stages).
Very thought-provoking quote by Toni Morrison. Thanks so much for sharing it, Dan!
I’m pretty sure Tom Sawyer does not see Jim as a person (whether he really sees anyone is a person rather than actors in his constant internal immature roleplay is debatable anyway), and Huck is at very early stages of starting to realize that Jim is a person (very early stages).
Totally agree with you here, Nataliya! When I read the novel as an adult, it was great at first on the river with Huck and Jim and then became uncomfortable with the King and the Duke chapters and then unbearable with the Tom Sawyer part. Like having to listen to this interminable story joke that's so tedious and cruel and unbelievable that it becomes a torment and then just keeps going on and on.... I did like his Innocents Abroad, about his world tour through Europe and the Holy Land, which has a lot of funny takes on tourists and famous sites etc., plus a few sublime moments.
Jefferson wrote: "Totally agree with you here, Nataliya! When I read the novel as an adult, it was great at first on the river with Huck and Jim and then became uncomfortable with the King and the Duke chapters and ..."
Yes, exactly my experience here. Whatever possessed him to write those Tom Sawyer chapters here?
I haven’t read Innocents Abroad but will certainly remedy it soon. Twain had a rare sense of humor and I would like to experience that again.
Yes, exactly my experience here. Whatever possessed him to write those Tom Sawyer chapters here?
I haven’t read Innocents Abroad but will certainly remedy it soon. Twain had a rare sense of humor and I would like to experience that again.
Great review, Nataliya. I don't remember if I ever read this or all of Tom Sawyer. I think I just lost patience with it, or perhaps was just annoyed at them, like you; I don't really remember. But strangely enough, I always liked Mark Twain's humor, probably later in life, though. I liked his short stories and various quotations I've heard.
I liked the interludes about the King and Duke (the line "If that don't fetch 'em, I don't know Arkansas" was especially on point) and the Shepherdson feud for their social commentary, but all the Tom Sawyer material in the second half was excruciatingly awful.
Marty wrote: "Great review, Nataliya. I don't remember if I ever read this or all of Tom Sawyer. I think I just lost patience with it, or perhaps was just annoyed at them, like you; I don't really remember. But ..."
Mark Twain humor is very good indeed. I need to reread some of his funnier stories since I could use a good laugh.
Mark Twain humor is very good indeed. I need to reread some of his funnier stories since I could use a good laugh.
Kevin wrote: "I liked the interludes about the King and Duke (the line "If that don't fetch 'em, I don't know Arkansas" was especially on point) and the Shepherdson feud for their social commentary, but all the ..."
You’re the first person who said he liked those chapters! It certainly shows that every reader is so different :) And that line was indeed brilliant; Twain sure knew people well.
If I ever get my hands on a time machine, nice I finish solving the world’s more pressing problems, I’ll pop into the 19th century to tell Twain to get rid of those godawful Tom Sawyer chapters.
You’re the first person who said he liked those chapters! It certainly shows that every reader is so different :) And that line was indeed brilliant; Twain sure knew people well.
If I ever get my hands on a time machine, nice I finish solving the world’s more pressing problems, I’ll pop into the 19th century to tell Twain to get rid of those godawful Tom Sawyer chapters.
Nataliya wrote: "Kevin wrote: "I liked the interludes about the King and Duke (the line "If that don't fetch 'em, I don't know Arkansas" was especially on point) and the Shepherdson feud for their social commentary..."
Twain was obviously choking on his bile towards his contemporaries, when he wrote all those passages where the King posed as a minister from England and made all those nauseating speeches. He perfectly captured the smarmy, florid style of the Victorian era.
Twain was obviously choking on his bile towards his contemporaries, when he wrote all those passages where the King posed as a minister from England and made all those nauseating speeches. He perfectly captured the smarmy, florid style of the Victorian era.
Kevin wrote: "He perfectly captured the smarmy, florid style of the Victorian era."
Yeah, I’d hate to be on the receiving end of Twain’s displeasure :)
Yeah, I’d hate to be on the receiving end of Twain’s displeasure :)
A really good review, Nataliya. Well done.
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too...
It doesn't seem to have made much of an impression on me, but I might consider it again down the track.
Cheers from CB
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too...
It doesn't seem to have made much of an impression on me, but I might consider it again down the track.
Cheers from CB
Colin wrote: "A really good review, Nataliya. Well done.
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too...
It doesn't..."
Thanks, Colin!
I think most people read it in childhood, which to me is a bit odd. I read it as a kid myself, and honestly, as a kid it’s hard to understand
a lot of what Twain is saying. Many “classics” were not meant to be for kids, and it’s odd that many of them became kid reading in schools.
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too...
It doesn't..."
Thanks, Colin!
I think most people read it in childhood, which to me is a bit odd. I read it as a kid myself, and honestly, as a kid it’s hard to understand
a lot of what Twain is saying. Many “classics” were not meant to be for kids, and it’s odd that many of them became kid reading in schools.
On my last reread of this book it struck me that Mark Twain had started writing an American Candide, but lost the never to complete it, and thus ended it as childish farce. Twain wanted everyone to love him too much to take Huckleberry Finn to the logical conclusion of where it should have gone, and so caved by going in for cheap laughs.
I see the King and Duke chapters as belonging to the first part of the book, though. Despite at first sight seeming ludicrous, they were actually written as quite dark and ruthless. They delivered real menaces to Huck and Jim, and also were significant players for some of Twain’s sharp cultural satire.
I see the King and Duke chapters as belonging to the first part of the book, though. Despite at first sight seeming ludicrous, they were actually written as quite dark and ruthless. They delivered real menaces to Huck and Jim, and also were significant players for some of Twain’s sharp cultural satire.
Nataliya wrote: "Colin wrote: "A really good review, Nataliya. Well done.
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too..."
Yep. Good point.
Cheers CB
After reading it, it's given me a bit of a nudge and in the darkest corners of my memory I've realised I might have read this as a child too..."
Yep. Good point.
Cheers CB
Theo wrote: "On my last reread of this book it struck me that Mark Twain had started writing an American Candide, but lost the never to complete it, and thus ended it as childish farce. Twain wanted everyone to..."
That would make sense. Start one thing, change halfway through and default to Tom Sawyer antics that he knew people already liked.
What logical conclusion for this book do you see? I’m curious. Does that involve Huck actually getting Jim out and leaving the South? Or Jim being forced back into slavery?
That would make sense. Start one thing, change halfway through and default to Tom Sawyer antics that he knew people already liked.
What logical conclusion for this book do you see? I’m curious. Does that involve Huck actually getting Jim out and leaving the South? Or Jim being forced back into slavery?
Nataliya, there was not a happy ending coming. Huck and Jim missed the Ohio River and were literally going “down the river” into the deeper South, from which there was no escape. Before Tom Sawyer appeared, the book was a pitch dark satire, with a high body count, murders, blood feuds, lynchings, and unscrupulous and dangerous con men. The book was headed toward a dark satirical ending that was totally out of line with the light humorist style that Twain had built up to that point. Rather than risking taking it there, he flinched.
It’s kinda crazy that this book is thought of as a kids book considering how dark the first two thirds of it is.
It’s kinda crazy that this book is thought of as a kids book considering how dark the first two thirds of it is.