Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Shocking Laws From History
    Shocking Laws From History
    Shocking Laws From History
    Ebook116 pages1 hour

    Shocking Laws From History

    By Shane O'Brien

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Welcome to a journey through time, where the laws were stranger than fiction, the punishments more curious than crime, and the rulers just a little bit mad. Imagine living in a world where your morning coffee could get you executed, your nagging neighbour dunked in a pond, and your cattle fined for strolling down the streets of London. These aren't scenes from a Monty Python sketch—they're the real laws of our past.

    History, as it turns out, is not just about wars and treaties; it's also about the peculiar rules that governed everyday life. This book is your ticket to a world where laws were crafted to control everything from the length of your beard to the number of days in a week. Prepare to be shocked, amused, and sometimes bewildered as we delve into the astonishing ways societies have tried to keep order (or chaos) throughout the ages.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherShane O'Brien
    Release dateAug 20, 2024
    ISBN9798227058294
    Shocking Laws From History

    Related to Shocking Laws From History

    Related ebooks

    True Crime For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      A Lesson of Virtue

      Jul 21, 2022

      A Lesson of Virtue
      4 min read

    • Article

      Damnatio Memoriae

      Dec 10, 2021

      Yo soy yo y mi circunstancia, y si no la salvo a ella no me salvo yo. José Ortega y Gasset, Meditaciones del Quijote One of the first principles the diplomatic corps inculcates is that we mustn’t judge a society by how it appears at the present momen

      12 min read

    • Article

      When Theft Was Worse Than Murder: Hundreds of years of trial documents reveal our changing attitudes to violent crime.

      Apr 24, 2014

      The records of the Old Bailey, London’s central criminal court, tell the tale of one John Randal, who was tried on Sept. 9, 1674. He was charged “with two Indictments, one for Fellony for stealing several pieces of Plate, and other Goods…, and the ot

      10 min read

    • Article

      Mining, The Legacy

      Jul 1, 2024

      The mining article (“Digging for victory” (June 29) could also have looked at the environmental impact of mine tailings and tailings-dam failures. I encourage readers to consider the following: Most metals are extracted from hard rock, which is crush

      8 min read

    • Article

      Stilling The Pendulum

      Feb 13, 2023

      Stilling The Pendulum
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Bloody Code

      Jun 10, 2021

      The Bloody Code
      6 min read

    • Article

      How To Stop A Conspiracy: An Ancient Guide To Saving A Republic

      Nov 18, 2022

      By Josiah Osgood ISBN: 978-0691212364 Princeton University Press (2022) - £12.99 www.press.princeton.edu The Catiline Conspiracy of 63 BC was, for Rome, another scary road bump that could’ve turned out quite badly but didn’t – miraculously

      3 min read

    • Article

      Did The Romans Wear Underwear?

      Mar 25, 2021

      Did The Romans Wear Underwear?
      7 min read

    • Article

      “Our Forebears Embraced The Joy Of Sex. They Had A Great Time”

      Jul 8, 2021

      Ellie Cawthorne: What do you think are the main things that we’ve got wrong about the history of sex? Fern Riddell: Everything. If you look at what you learned in school, perhaps what you were told by family and friends, by TV and films, there’s so l

      8 min read

    • Article

      The Many Faces of Cultural Appropriation

      Dec 7, 2021

      The Many Faces of Cultural Appropriation
      12 min read

    • Article

      Why History Must Take A Stance

      Feb 18, 2021

      Why History Must Take A Stance
      9 min read

    • Article

      CRUSADES LAW & ORDER

      Jul 11, 2024

      Criminality and lawlessness have historically gone hand in hand with major conflicts. Whether perpetrated by the combatants involved or by those on the sidelines, profiteering or exploiting the chaos of conflict to avoid accountability, it’s often as

      7 min read

    • Article

      Feigning a Faint

      Jul 11, 2019

      Feigning a Faint
      3 min read

    • Article

      Fight Things That Really Matter

      Apr 1, 2022

      THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORY faculty’s library is called “the Seeley”. It has been in its current, James Stirling-designed building since 1968, and named after the eponymous Sir John (an eminent Victorian) since 1897. You will not be surprised to learn that

      8 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Shocking Laws From History

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Shocking Laws From History - Shane O'Brien

      Mediaeval Ducking Stool

      The mediaeval ducking stool stands as one of the more peculiar and emblematic instruments of punishment from the Middle Ages. It was particularly associated with the punishment of women accused of being scolds—a term used to describe women who were perceived as nagging, quarrelsome, or gossiping too much. This punitive device reflects the gender norms, societal values, and legal practices of the time.

      The use of the ducking stool dates back to the 15th century and persisted into the 18th century. This period in Europe was characterised by strict social hierarchies and rigid gender roles. Women were expected to be subservient to men, managing domestic affairs and maintaining a demeanour of modesty and obedience. Any deviation from these expectations, such as gossiping or scolding, was considered a threat to social order and patriarchal authority.

      The punishment was one of several methods used to enforce conformity. Other similar punishments included the pillory, the stocks, and the cucking stool (a precursor to the ducking stool, often involving being forced to sit on a rough stool as a form of humiliation). These punishments were often carried out in public spaces like market squares, where the community could witness the humiliation.

      It was employed across various parts of Europe, particularly in England and colonial America. The practice reflects the broader societal tendency to control and punish behaviours that were seen as transgressive or disruptive.

      The ducking stool was essentially a chair attached to a long wooden beam, mounted on a fulcrum that allowed it to be lowered and raised. The chair could be placed on a cart and wheeled to a nearby body of water, such as a pond or river. Once at the water’s edge, the accused woman would be securely strapped into the chair, which was then swung out over the water and repeatedly dunked.

      There were variations in the design of ducking stools. Some were fixed to the banks of rivers or ponds, while others were mobile and could be transported from one location to another. The most common form, however, was a simple wooden chair affixed to a lever mechanism that could submerge the person seated in it.

      The punishment involved repeatedly dunking the woman in cold water, which served both to humiliate and physically discomfort her. The number of times a woman was ducked varied, depending on the perceived severity of her offence. In some instances, the punishment could be fatal if the victim was dunked repeatedly and could not breathe properly between dunkings. The duration and frequency of the dunkings varied, but it was generally intended to be a public spectacle, with onlookers gathered to witness the punishment. This public aspect was crucial, as the punishment was not only about disciplining the individual but also about reinforcing social norms and deterring others from similar behaviour.

      The primary offences leading to punishment by ducking stool were gossiping and scolding. The punishment was deeply rooted in the belief that women’s tongues (and thus their words) were a source of trouble, and controlling them was seen as necessary for maintaining social harmony. Gossiping was believed to spread discord and disrupt social harmony, while scolding was viewed as a challenge to male authority and domestic order.

      Other behaviours could also lead to punishment by ducking stool. These included acts of public disturbance, quarrelsomeness, and occasionally accusations of witchcraft. The underlying theme in all these offences was the perception that the woman in question was stepping outside the bounds of acceptable behaviour and challenging the societal norms of female conduct.

      The use of the punishment had profound implications for women and society at large. It reinforced the subordinate position of women in mediaeval and early modern Europe, sending a clear message that any deviation from prescribed roles and behaviours would be met with harsh punishment. The humiliation involved in being publicly dunked in water, often in front of a jeering crowd, was intended to break the spirit of the accused and enforce social conformity.

      It was a tool of patriarchy, used to maintain male dominance and control over women. This form of punishment was part of a broader system of gendered discipline that included other practices such as the scold’s bridle (a metal device that prevented speech) and various forms of corporal punishment.

      The use of the ducking stool was sanctioned by local authorities, who were responsible for maintaining order and enforcing laws. These authorities included local magistrates, justices of the peace, and sometimes ecclesiastical courts. The legal framework that supported the use of the ducking stool was rooted in the concept of common law, which allowed for a range of punishments for minor offences and

      misdemeanours. Punishments were often decided on a case-by-case basis, with local customs and attitudes influencing the severity and nature of the penalty. In some cases, community members could bring accusations against a woman, leading to her being sentenced to the ducking stool. This communal involvement in the justice process meant that social prejudices and biases could heavily influence who was punished and for what reasons.

      Although it is often depicted as a humiliating punishment involving repeated dunking in water, in some cases, the victim could be submerged for long periods, leading to drowning. This wasn't just a punishment of shame but could be a death sentence under the guise of testing innocence or guilt—if the accused drowned, they were considered innocent.

      Although the ducking stool is most commonly associated with punishing women, it was occasionally used on men as well. Men who were punished with the ducking stool were typically accused of being disorderly, scolding, or abusive, such as in cases of domestic violence. However, it was much rarer for men to be subjected to this punishment, as it was primarily used to enforce social norms on women, particularly those who were seen as disruptive or unruly in their communities.

      The use of this punishment began to decline in the 18th century, as societal attitudes towards punishment and justice evolved. The Enlightenment brought new ideas about individual rights, humane treatment, and the role of the state in administering justice. The decline of the ducking stool also reflected broader changes in the legal system, including the professionalisation of law enforcement and the development of modern penal institutions.

      Today, the ducking stool is remembered as a symbol of the harsh and often misogynistic justice systems of the past. It is frequently cited as an example of how women were disproportionately targeted and punished for behaviours that were not criminal but rather social deviations from the expected gender norms.  It serves as a reminder of the ways in which legal and social institutions were used to control and oppress women, enforcing strict gender norms and punishing those who deviated from them.

      Historical accounts and depictions of the ducking stool provide valuable insights into the nature of mediaeval and early modern justice.   They highlight the intersection of law, gender, and social order, illustrating how inappropriate measures were used to enforce conformity and maintain

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1