Business | Non-profit motives

Inside OpenAI’s weird governance structure

Why investors had no say in Sam Altman’s sacking

From left: Sam Altman, Mira Murati, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever.
Photograph: Jim Wilson/New York Times/Redux/Eyevine

“WHICH WOULD you have more confidence in? Getting your technology from a non-profit, or a for-profit company that is entirely controlled by one human being?” asked Brad Smith, president of Microsoft, at a conference in Paris on November 10th. That was Mr Smith’s way of praising OpenAI, the startup behind ChatGPT, and knocking companies like Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s social-media giant. Events of the past week, which began on November 17th with OpenAI’s board firing its boss, Sam Altman, and ended four days later with his return to the startup he co-founded, have made the non-profit setups look rather less attractive. They have also thrown a spotlight on AI darlings’ unusual governance arrangements.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Non-profit motives”

Climate report: Some progress, must try harder

From the November 25th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

Physical proximity has big effects in the workplace

It needs to be managed wisely

Intel is on life support. Can anything save it?

Only drastic action can revive America’s chipmaking champion


European firms are smaller and less profitable than American ones

The continent’s policymakers are right to be worried


Demand for high-end cameras is soaring

The ubiquity of smartphones has helped

People are splurging like never before on their pets

Would you buy your furry companion a cologne?

Why family empires dominate business in India

Their grip on the economy may be starting to weaken—slowly