skip to main content
10.1145/956750.956846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Experimental design for solicitation campaigns

Published: 24 August 2003 Publication History

Abstract

Data mining techniques are routinely used by fundraisers to select those prospects from a large pool of candidates who are most likely to make a financial contribution. These techniques often rely on statistical models based on trial performance data. This trial performance data is typically obtained by soliciting a smaller sample of the possible prospect pool. Collecting this trial data involves a cost; therefore the fundraiser is interested in keeping the trial size small while still collecting enough data to build a reliable statistical model that will be used to evaluate the remainder of the prospects.We describe an experimental design approach to optimally choose the trial prospects from an existing large pool of prospects. Prospects are clustered to render the problem practically tractable. We modify the standard D-optimality algorithm to prevent repeated selection of the same prospect cluster, since each prospect can only be solicited at most once.We assess the benefits of this approach on the KDD-98 data set by comparing the performance of the model based on the optimal trial data set with that of a model based on a randomly selected trial data set of equal size.

References

[1]
Douglas C. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 5th edition, 2001.]]
[2]
V. V. Fedorov. Theory of Optimal Experiments, translated and edited by W. J. Studden and E. M. Klimko, New York: Academic Press, 1972.]]
[3]
Saharon Rosset and Aaron Inger. KDD-Cup 99: Knowledge Discovery In a Charitable Organization's Donor Database, Amdocs (Israel) Ltd, 8 Hapnina St, Raanana, Israel, 43000 (1999).]]
[4]
Jim Georges and Anne H. Milley, KDD'99 Competition: Knowledge Discovery Contest, SAS Institute, Jamboree Ctr, Ste 900, 5 Park Plz, Irvine, CA 92614, USA (1999).]]
[5]
Bianca Zadrozny and Charles Elkan. Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naïve Bayesian classifiers, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA (2001).]]
[6]
Jacob Zahavi and Nissan Levin. Urban Science wins the KDD-98 Cup, Tel Aviv University and Urban Science, http://www.urbanscience.com{press release, no longer available} (1998).]]
[7]
The SAS Institute. SAS software takes top medals in KDD data-mining competition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA {press release, no longer available} (1998).]]
[8]
Quadstone Ltd. KDD Cup 98: Quadstone Take Bronze Miner Award, Quadstone Ltd., http://www.quadstone.com {press release, no longer available} (1998).]]
[9]
J. Kiefer. Optimum Experimental Designs. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B., Vol 21, 272--304 (1959).]]
[10]
J. Kiefer and J. Wolfowitz Optimum Designs in Regression Problems. Annals Math. Stat., Vol 30, 271--294 (1959).]]

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Experimental design for solicitation campaigns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '03: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
    August 2003
    736 pages
    ISBN:1581137370
    DOI:10.1145/956750
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 August 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data collection
    2. experimental design
    3. solicitation campaign

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    KDD03
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    KDD '03 Paper Acceptance Rate 46 of 298 submissions, 15%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media