skip to main content
10.1145/581339.581349acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Further investigations into the development and evaluation of reading techniques for object-oriented code inspection

Published: 19 May 2002 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the development and experimental evaluation of a rigorous approach for effective object-oriented (OO) code inspection. Since their development, inspections have been shown to be powerful defect detection strategies but little research has been done to investigate their application to OO systems, which have very different structural and execution models compared to procedural systems. Previous investigations have demonstrated that the delocalised nature of OO software - the resolution of frequent non-local references, and the incongruous relationship between its static and dynamic representations, are primary inhibitors to its effective inspection. The experiment investigates a set of three complementary code reading techniques devised specifically to address these problems: one based on a checklist adapted to address the identified problems of OO inspections, one focused on the systematic construction of abstract specifications, and the last centered on the dynamic slice that a use-case takes through a system. The analysis shows that there is a significant difference in the number of defects found between the three reading techniques. The checklist-based technique emerges as the most effective approach but the other techniques also have noticeable strengths and so for the best results in a practical situation a combination of techniques is recommended.

References

[1]
Baldwin, J. T., An Abbreviated C++ Code Inspection Checklist, John T. Baldwin, University of Illinois, Department of Computer Science, October 1992 (available at http://www2.ics.hawaii.edu/~johnson/FTR/Bib/Baldwin92.html).
[2]
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
[3]
Chernak, Y., A Statistical Approach to the Inspection Checklist Formal Synthesis and Improvement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(12), pp. 866-874, 1996.
[4]
Dunsmore, A. The Role of Comprehension and Defects in OO Inspection, Technical Report - EFoCS-34-99, August 1999.
[5]
Dunsmore, A., Roper, M., Wood, M. Object-Oriented Inspection in the Face of Delocalisation, appeared in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2000, pp. 467-476, June 2000.
[6]
Dunsmore, A. Survey of Object-Oriented Defect Detection Approaches and Experience in Industry, Technical Report - EFoCS-36-2000, July 2000.
[7]
Dunsmore, A. An Empirical Investigation of a Systematic Object-Oriented Inspection Technique, Technical Report - EFoCS-37-2000.
[8]
Dunsmore, A., Roper, M., Wood, M. Systematic Object-Oriented Inspection - An Empirical Study, appeared in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2001, pp. 135-144, May 2001.
[9]
Fagan, M. E. Advances in Software Inspections, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 7, July, 1986.
[10]
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J. Design Patterns, Addison-Wesley, 1994.
[11]
Gilb, T., Graham, D. Software Inspection, Addison-Wesley, 1993.
[12]
Humphrey, W. H., A Discipline for Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
[13]
Laitenberger, O., DeBaud, J-M, An Encompassing Life-Cycle Centric Survey of Software Inspection, ISERN-98-32.
[14]
Miller, J., Daly, J., Wood, M., Roper, M., Brooks, A., Statistical power and its subcomponents - missing and misunderstood concepts in empirical software engineering research, Information and Software Technology, 39, pp. 285-295, 1997.
[15]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Software Formal Inspection Guidebook. Technical Report NASA-GB-A302, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, August 1993. http://satc.gsfc.nasa.gov/fi/
[16]
Priestley, M. Practical Object-Oriented Design with UML, McGraw-Hill, 2000.
[17]
Soloway, E. Pinto, J. Letovsky, S. Littman, D. and Lampert, R. Designing Documentation to Compensate for Delocalised Plans, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 1259-1267, 1988.
[18]
Stevens, P. with Pooley, R. Using UML - Software Engineering with Objects and Components, Addison-Wesley, Updated Edition, 2000.
[19]
Weller, E. F. Lessons from Three Years of Inspection Data, IEEE Software, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 38-45, September 1993.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '02: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering
May 2002
797 pages
ISBN:158113472X
DOI:10.1145/581339
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 May 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ICSE02
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICSE '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 303 submissions, 15%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media