skip to main content
10.1145/3673805.3673842acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

How to create sustainable artefacts? Towards a user-centered design guide for low-techs/appropriate technologies

Published: 08 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Technocene is a proposed phenomenon that draws attention to the negative impacts of our technological culture. Low-techs (also known as appropriate technologies) are a possible avenue for transforming this technological culture. The low-tech approach indeed calls for renewing mainstream design practices (e.g., by questioning needs to keep only the essentials, by reducing the complexity of artefacts, by maintaining rather than replacing). Unfortunately, there is a lack of guidance regarding the design process to follow in order to produce low-techs. In order to fill this gap, the present article proposes the first version of a design guide expanding on seven principles (Needs and Satisfiers Negotiation; Autonomy-Assistance Arbitration; Discoverability; Operative Transparency; Non-Functional Aspects; Information, Education and Training; Compensation) taken from previous research. Next steps necessary for the improvement and validation of the guide are also discussed.

References

[1]
Stéphane Andrieux. 2023. Vers un discernement technologique. Académie des technologies, Paris.
[2]
Stefano Boni. 2022. Homo confort. L’Échappée, Paris.
[3]
Anne-Charlotte Bonjean, Erwann Fangeat, Astrid Forget, Alan Fustec, Camille Habe, Romain Jaeger, Loraine Moiroud, Eloise Morales, Clement Chabot, and Low-tech Lab. 2022. État des lieux et perspectives des démarches « low-tech ». ADEME. Retrieved from https://librairie.ademe.fr/dechets-economie-circulaire/5421-demarches-low-tech.html
[4]
Clement Colin. 2023. Ergonomie des artefacts partagés: de la conceptualisation des activités de partage à l’élaboration et validation de principes de partageabilité. Université de Lorraine, Metz. Retrieved from https://hal.science/tel-04203180
[5]
Clement Colin and Antoine Martin. 2023. The user experience of low-techs: from user problems to design principles. Journal of User Experience 18, 2 (2023), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.5555/3604890.3604892
[6]
Christophe Dejours. 2022. Le facteur humain (8th ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
[7]
Jonathan D. Ericson. 2022. Reimagining the role of friction in experience design. Journal of User Experience 17, 4 (2022), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.5555/3604650.3604651
[8]
Christian Guillevic. 1990. L'appropriation cognitive de l'outil: condition de la fiabilité dans les situations de transfert de technologies. In Les facteurs humains de la fiabilité dans les systèmes complexes, Jacques Leplat and Gilbert De Terssac (eds.). Octares, Toulouse, 141–158.
[9]
François Jarrige. 2019. De l'innovation héroïque au Technocène. Réflexions sur l'histoire des techniques à l’ère des crises écologiques. Critical Hermeneutics 3, (2019), 171–208. https://doi.org/10.13125/CH/3879
[10]
Florence Lespiau and André Tricot. 2019. Using primary knowledge: an efficient way to motivate students and promote the learning of formal reasoning. Educational Psychology Review 31, 4 (2019), 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09482-4
[11]
Cathie Marache-Francisco. 2015. Gamification des interactions humain-technologie: représentation, conception et évaluation d'un guide pour la gamification des interfaces. Université de Lorraine, Metz. Retrieved from https://hal.science/tel-01751834
[12]
Philip Marsden and Mark Kirby. 2005. Allocation of functions. In Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods, Neville Stanton, Alan Hedge, Karel Brookhuis, Eduardo Salas and Hal Hendrick (eds.). CRC Press, 301–308.
[13]
Antoine Martin, Alexandre Gaultier, and Clement Colin. 2022. Cartographie du concept low-tech: guider la conception vers des techniques soutenables. In Actes du 56ème Congrès de la SELF, 2022. Geneva, 144–150. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-03598525
[14]
Maurice de Montmollin. 1972. Les psychopitres: une autocritique de la psychologie industrielle (2nd ed.). Presses Universitaires de France. Retrieved from https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3353826m
[15]
Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To save everything, click here: the folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs, New York.
[16]
Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York.
[17]
Viviane Perret. 2018. Élaboration et validation de critères ergonomiques pour les interactions homme système simplexe. Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse. Retrieved from http://dante.univ-tlse2.fr/9355/
[18]
Beatriz Pozo Arcos, Conny Bakker, Bas Flipsen, and Ruud Balkenende. 2020. Practices of fault diagnosis in household appliances: Insights for design. Journal of Cleaner Production 265, (2020), 121812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121812
[19]
Pierre Rabardel. 2002. People and technology: a cognitive approach to contemporary instruments. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-01020705
[20]
Janine Rogalski and Renan Samurçay. 1993. Représentations de référence: outils pour le contrôle d'environnements dynamiques. In Représentations pour l'action, Annie Weill-Fassina, Pierre Rabardel and Danièle Dubois (eds.). Octares, Toulouse, 183–207.
[21]
Wout van Wezel, Julien Cegarra, and Jean-Michel Hoc. 2010. Allocating functions to human and algorithm in scheduling. In Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling, Jan C. Fransoo, Toni Waefler and John R. Wilson (eds.). Springer, Berlin, 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13382-4_14
[22]
Kelvin W. Willoughby. 1990. Technology choice: a critique of the appropriate technology movement. Westview Press, Boulder & London.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ECCE '24: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2024
October 2024
286 pages
ISBN:9798400718243
DOI:10.1145/3673805
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 October 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ECCE 2024

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 32
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media