skip to main content
10.1145/3657054.3657139acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Benchmark for Public Ombudsman Portals of the State Courts of Accounts in Brazil

Published: 11 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In Brazil, public ombudsman offices, established to handle citizen complaints about public services, face challenges amidst the ongoing digital transformation of governmental institutions. While government strategies aim at modernization, practical implementation falls short, evident in issues such as infrastructure problems and service disconnection. This extends to public ombudsman offices, as it is part of the public bodies, being difficult even to measure and compare their portals to each other. This study, conducted in partnership with the State Court of Accounts of Pernambuco, seeks to address these challenges by creating a benchmark for evaluating Brazilian State Courts of Accounts’ ombudsman portals. Drawing on relevant legislation, the Brazilian Public Ombudsman Maturity Model, and public service literature, the benchmark establishes requirements and acceptance criteria, validated by public service specialists, aiming to evaluate the portals and through this evaluation, assist the ombudsman’s offices in understanding what needs to be improved or implemented on their portals to achieve their objectives. This benchmark also enables ombudsman’s offices to learn from each other. The main conclusions highlights the need for public ombudsman portals to improve the way they implement their core services, such as registering and tracking of citizen’s manifestations. Additionally, there’s an emphasis on the necessity for portals to reach a broader audience by implementing more accessibility features and modernizing their communication and navigation through virtual assistants and chat bots. The application of the benchmark also clarifies that there are better-developed portals that can serve as inspiration for less-developed ones, both in general and in terms of specific requirements.

References

[1]
[n. d.]. Painel da Ouvidoria Geral do Distrito Federal. http://www.painel.ouv.df.gov.br/dashboard. Retrieved July 02, 2023.
[2]
Nick Bennett. 2020. The new public services Ombudsman for Wales Act 2019: the story 2014 - 2020. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 42, 3 (2020), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1796216
[3]
BRASIL. 2011. Law no. 12.527. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2011/Lei/L12527.htm.
[4]
BRASIL. 2017. Law no. 13.460. Available at: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13460.htm.
[5]
Brian Brewer. 2007. Citizen or customer? Complaints handling in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences 73, 4 (2007), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307083457
[6]
Kellyton Brito, Marcos Costa, Vinicius Garcia, and Silvio Meira. 2014. Brazilian government open data: implementation, challenges, and potential opportunities. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612770
[7]
Kellyton Brito, Marcos Costa, Vinicius Garcia, and Silvio Meira. 2014. Experiences Integrating Heterogeneous Government Open Data Sources to Deliver Services and Promote Transparency in Brazil. In 2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference. Vasteras, Sweden, 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.87
[8]
Kellyton Brito, Marcos Costa, Vinicius Garcia, and Silvio Meira. 2015. Assessing the benefits of open government data: the case of Meu Congresso Nacional in Brazilian elections 2014. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757422
[9]
Kellyton Brito, Misael Neto, Marcos Costa, Vinicius Garcia, and Silvio Meira. 2014. Using parliamentary Brazilian open data to improve transparency and public participation in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612769
[10]
Andreiwid S. Corrêa, Pedro Corrêa, and Flávio Silva. 2014. Transparency portals versus open government data: an assessment of openness in Brazilian municipalities. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612760
[11]
Andreiwid S. Corrêa, Evandro C. Paula, Pedro Corrêa, and Flávio Silva. 2017. Transparency and open government data: A wide national assessment of data openness in Brazilian local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 11, 1 (2017), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0052
[12]
Brasil Gov.br. 2019. História das Ouvidorias. https://www.gov.br/ouvidorias/pt-br/cidadao/conheca-a-ouvidoria/historia-das-ouvidorias. Retrieved July 02, 2023.
[13]
Brasil Gov.br. 2022. Modelo de Maturidade em Ouvidoria Pública. https://www.gov.br/ouvidorias/pt-br/ouvidorias/modelo-de-maturidade-em-ouvidoria-publica. Retrieved July 03, 2023.
[14]
Brasil Gov.br. 2023. Escala Brasil Transparente 360º. https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/assuntos/transparencia-publica/escala-brasil-transparente-360. Retrieved December 09, 2023.
[15]
Brasil Gov.br. 2024. Digital Accessibility Best Practices Guide. https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/acessibilidade-digital/ENGGuiaboaspraticasacessibilidadeBRUKv3.pdf. Retrieved January 05, 2024.
[16]
Giovani Junior and Simone Dufloth. 2020. Influência da participação popular em interface digital na proposição de leis estaduais. Revista Katálysis 23, 3 (2020), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02592020v23n3p489
[17]
Simon Kemp. 2023. Digital 2023: Global Overview Report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report.
[18]
Khairiyati Khairiyati, Iskandar A. Gani, and Zahratul Idami. 2022. Follow-Up Recommendations of The Ombudsman of The Republic of Indonesia in Supporting Public Services. Jurnal Public Policy 8, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v8i2.4135
[19]
Rodrigo S. Neves and Adriano S. Pedra. 2023. A ouvidoria no governo digital. Revista dos Tribunais 1047 (2023). Retrieved from https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/handle/2011/171727.
[20]
OECD. 2018. Digital Government Review of Brazil: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307636-en
[21]
Jeffrey J. Pittaway and Ali R. Montazemi. 2020. Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly 37, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474
[22]
Mary Seneviratne. 2000. Joining up the ombudsman - the review of the public sector ombudsman in England. Public Law (2000), 582–591. Retrieved from https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/5024.
[23]
Jose I. Silva and Thiago Oliveira. 2020. Ouvidoria e Gestão Pública: uma relação necessária. HOLOS 5 (2020), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2020.8459
[24]
Edvan Soares, Vanilson Burégio, Antonio Delgado, and Kellyton Brito. 2017. A Guiding Architecture and System for Making Crime Data Available in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085312
[25]
Jean Zahn, José Viterbo, and Cristiano Maciel. 2023. Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação em Ouvidorias Gerais Municipais do Estado de Mato Grosso. In Anais do XI Workshop de Computação Aplicada em Governo Eletrônico. SBC, Porto Alegre, Brasil, João Pessoa/PB, Brasil, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.5753/wcge.2023.230727

Index Terms

  1. Benchmark for Public Ombudsman Portals of the State Courts of Accounts in Brazil

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '24: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2024
    1089 pages
    ISBN:9798400709883
    DOI:10.1145/3657054
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 June 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Benchmark
    2. Computing in Government
    3. E-Government
    4. Ombudsman
    5. Participatory Democracy
    6. Public Service

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    dg.o 2024

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 22
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media