Experience Report: Meet the Professor - A Large-Course Intervention for Increasing Rapport
Pages 415 - 421
Abstract
In a large CS class, it's likely that most students will never speak with the instructor. This presents challenges in terms of student engagement. As class time is limited for building rapport, out-of-class interventions are recommended, such as meeting with students in small groups to discuss non-class topics. If an instructor is to meet with all the students, how can the benefits be maximized while mitigating impacts on the instructor's time and students' access to help? What should be discussed? And how beneficial are such meetings, given that they will have to be short? This paper introduces Meet the Professor (MTP), a course element designed with these issues in mind. MTP was deployed in three sections of an upper-division course at UC San Diego. In end-of-course surveys, students broadly reported increases to rapport, most notably finding instructors to be more approachable than they previously thought. Overwhelmingly, students reported appreciation for meeting with the instructor and did not find that MTP interfered with other learning opportunities. Recommendations are provided for managing the instructor's time and maximizing the value of the intervention.
References
[1]
Ian Beatty. 2004. Transforming Student Learning with Classroom Communication Systems. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research., 13 pages. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2004/2/transforming-studentlearning- with-classroom-communication-systems
[2]
Barbara H. Carson. 1996. Thirty Years of Stories: The Professor's Place in Student Memories. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 28, 6 (1996), 10--17.
[3]
Neil Fleming. 2003. Establishing Rapport: Personal Interaction and Learning -- IDEA Paper 39. The IDEA Center. https://www.ideaedu.org/idea_papers/ establishing-rapport-personal-interaction-and-learning/ Accessed October 8, 2022.
[4]
Florida [n. d.]. Establishing Effective Groups. University of Florida Center for Instructional Technology and Training. https://citt.ufl.edu/resources/studentengagement/ promoting-collaboration/establishing-effective-groups/ Accessed January 7, 2023.
[5]
David C. Funder and Daniel J Ozer. 2019. Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2 (2019), 156 -- 168.
[6]
H. Gehlbach, M. E. Brinkworth, A. M. King, L. M. Hsu, J. McIntyre, and T. Rogers. 2016. Creating birds of similar feathers: Leveraging similarity to improve teacher--student relationships and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 108, 3 (2016), 342----352. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000042
[7]
Joan Gorham. 1988. The Relationship between Verbal Teacher Immediacy Behaviors and Student Learning. Communication Education 37, 1 (1988), 40--53.
[8]
Rachelle S. Heller, Cheryl Beil, Kim Dam, and Belinda Haerum. 2010. Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 99 (2010).
[9]
Maurits Clemens Kaptein, Clifford Nass, and Panos Markopoulos. 2010. Powerful and Consistent Analysis of Likert-Type Rating Scales. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2391--2394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753686
[10]
Dave S. Kerby. 2014. The Simple Difference Formula: An Approach to Teaching Nonparametric Correlation. Comprehensive Psychology 3 (2014), 11.IT.3.1. https: //doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1
[11]
Cynthia K. Kirkwood. 2013. Teaching and engaging students in large classes. Mental Health Clinician 2, 10 (04 2013), 322--324. https:// doi.org/10.9740/mhc.n143601 arXiv:https://meridian.allenpress.com/mhc/articlepdf/ 2/10/322/2094292/mhc_n143601.pdf
[12]
Aditi Kothiyal, Rwitajit Majumdar, Sahana Murthy, and Sridhar Iyer. 2013. Effect of Think-Pair-Share in a Large CS1 Class: 83% Sustained Engagement. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (San Diego, San California, USA) (ICER '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137--144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493408
[13]
Yiping Lou, Philip C. Abrami, John C. Spence, Catherine Poulsen, Bette Chambers, and Sylvia d'Apollonia. 1996. Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research 66, 4 (1996), 423--458. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 00346543066004423 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423
[14]
Merriam-Webster Dictionary [n. d.]. Rapport Definition & Meaning. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rapport Accessed October 8, 2022.
[15]
Michael Morgan, Matthew Butler, Jane Sinclair, Christabel Gonsalvez, and Neena Thota. 2018. Contrasting CS Student and Academic Perspectives and Experiences of Student Engagement. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Larnaca, Cyprus) (ITiCSE 2018 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295777
[16]
Michael Morgan, Jane Sinclair, Matthew Butler, Neena Thota, Janet Fraser, Gerry Cross, and Jana Jackova. 2018. Understanding International Benchmarks on Student Engagement: Awareness and Research Alignment from a Computer Science Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports (Bologna, Italy) (ITiCSE-WGR '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174782
[17]
Leo Porter, Cynthia Bailey Lee, Beth Simon, and Daniel Zingaro. 2011. Peer Instruction: Do Students Really Learn from Peer Discussion in Computing?. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (Providence, Rhode Island, USA) (ICER '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45--52. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016923
[18]
Yolanda A. Rankin, JakitaO. Thomas, and Sheena Erete. 2021. BlackWomen Speak: Examining Power, Privilege, and Identity in CS Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4, Article 26 (oct 2021), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451344
[19]
Michael Roberto. 2021. Engaging Students on the First Day and Every Day. Harvard Business Publishing: Education - Teaching Center. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/ inspiring-minds/engaging-students-on-the-first-day-and-every-day Accessed October 8, 2022.
[20]
Beth Simon, Sarah Esper, Leo Porter, and Quintin Cutts. 2013. Student Experience in a Student-Centered Peer Instruction Classroom. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (San Diego, San California, USA) (ICER '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493407
[21]
Stanford Center for Teaching and Learning [n. d.]. Tomorrow's Professor. https: //ctl.stanford.edu/tomproff Accessed October 9, 2022.
[22]
Patrick T. Terenzini and Ernest T. Pascareua. 1994. Living with Myths: Undergraduate Education in America. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 26, 1 (feb 1994), 28--32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1994.9938488
[23]
University of Texas at Austin Center for Teaching and Learning [n. d.]. Teaching LARGE Classes. https://ctl.utexas.edu/instructional-strategies/teaching-largeclasses Accessed October 8, 2022.
[24]
Melanie Walker. 2001. Engineering Identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22, 1 (2001), 75--89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690020030792 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690020030792
[25]
A. Wilsman. 2013. Teaching Large Classes. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-large-classes/ Accessed October 8, 2022.
[26]
Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning [n. d.]. Large Classes. https: //poorvucenter.yale.edu/LargeClasses Accessed October 8, 2022.
[27]
Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning [n. d.]. Inclusive Classroom Climate. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/ClassClimates Accessed January 22, 2023.
[28]
Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning [n. d.]. Awareness of Socioeconomic Diversity. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/ SocioeconomicDiversityAwareness Accessed August 1, 2023.
[29]
James E. Zull. 2002. The Art of Changing The Brain: Enriching The Practice of Teaching by Exploring The Biology of Learning. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Virginia. 263 pages.
Index Terms
- Experience Report: Meet the Professor - A Large-Course Intervention for Increasing Rapport
Recommendations
Rudeness and rapport: insults and learning gains in peer tutoring
ITS'12: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring SystemsFor 20 years, researchers have envisioned artificially intelligent learning companions that evolve with their students as they grow and learn. However, while communication theory suggests that positivity decreases over time in relationships, most ...
Student Participation and Achievement in a Large Lecture Course With Game-Based Learning
Background The use of game-based learning strategies in higher education has shown promise to increase student motivation and achievement . Although studies have begun to explore the structuring of courses as a game , little is known on who ...
Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment and Rapport in Collaborative Learning Dialogues
MLA '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand ChallengeIn spoken dialogue analysis, the speech signal is a rich source of information. We explore in this paper how low level features of the speech signal, such as pitch, loudness, and speaking rate, can inform a model of student interaction in collaborative ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2024
1583 pages
ISBN:9798400704239
DOI:10.1145/3626252
- General Chairs:
- Ben Stephenson,
- Jeffrey A. Stone,
- Program Chairs:
- Lina Battestilli,
- Samuel A. Rebelsky,
- Libby Shoop
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 March 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
SIGCSE 2024
Sponsor:
SIGCSE 2024: The 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
March 20 - 23, 2024
OR, Portland, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%
Upcoming Conference
SIGCSE TS 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigcse
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 228Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)228
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in