skip to main content
10.1145/3616901.3617020acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfaimlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Sea Turtle Individual's Recognition

Published: 05 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Identification of individual turtles for population studies usually uses fin tags or other physical markers. Since this method is not very practical, we are studying different convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify individual images of turtles by using transfer learning networks AlexNet, GoogleNet, VGG-19 Net and ResNet50. Sea turtles, unlike other animals, have unique facial patterns, making them excellent prospects for feature recognition. This study examined 1426 images of right facial scutes from 20 classes of turtles. Experiments with high-quality, low-quality and a mixture of both image qualities were conducted to test the performance of different CNNs. The ResNet50 technique achieved 95.3% accuracy with a mixed dataset, and AlexNet obtained the highest accuracy with high-quality image dataset (97.74%). The VGG19 network, on the other hand, performed well for dataset containing low-quality images with 91.82% accuracy. Experiments have shown different results for each data set. However, considering the uncertainty in a real underwater environment where the captured image quality is sometimes high and sometimes low, the ResNet50 network addresses this task-related problem as it has achieved the highest accuracy for the mixed dataset.

References

[1]
Zafer Attal and Cem Direkoglu. 2019. Sea turtle species classification for environmental research and conservation. In International Conference on Theory and Application of Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions. Springer, 580–587.
[2]
S Santhosh Baboo and ARJ Vigneswari. 2014. Identification of olive Ridley turtle using feature extraction. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Computing Applications. IEEE, 69–72.
[3]
Mohammed Brahimi, Kamel Boukhalfa, and Abdelouahab Moussaoui. 2017. Deep learning for tomato diseases: classification and symptoms visualization. Applied Artificial Intelligence 31, 4 (2017), 299–315.
[4]
Steven JB Carter, Ian P Bell, Jessica J Miller, and Peter P Gash. 2014. Automated marine turtle photograph identification using artificial neural networks, with application to green turtles. Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 452 (2014), 105–110.
[5]
Vicki Yii-Ching Chew, Hock-Chark Liew, and Juanita Joseph. 2015. Photographic identification of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at Redang Island, Malaysia. Marine Turtle Newsletter 146 (2015), 1–6.
[6]
Peter Dutton and Donna McDonald. 1994. Use of PIT tags to identify adult leatherbacks. Marine Turtle Newsletter 67 (1994), 13–14.
[7]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778.
[8]
Jason Holmberg, Bradley Norman, and Zaven Arzoumanian. 2009. Estimating population size, structure, and residency time for whale sharks Rhincodon typus through collaborative photo-identification. Endangered Species Research 7, 1 (2009), 39–53.
[9]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2017. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 6 (2017), 84–90.
[10]
Jiangchuan Liu, Mantao Wang, Lie Bao, Xiaofan Li, Jun Sun, and Yue Ming. 2020. Classification and recognition of turtle images based on convolutional neural network. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 782. IOP Publishing, 052044.
[11]
Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 22, 10 (2009), 1345–1359.
[12]
Júlia Reisser, Maíra Proietti, Paul Kinas, and Ivan Sazima. 2008. Photographic identification of sea turtles: method description and validation, with an estimation of tag loss. Endangered Species Research 5, 1 (2008), 73–82.
[13]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[14]
Navjot S Sodhi and Paul R Ehrlich. 2010. Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press.
[15]
C Szegedy, W Liu, Y Jia, P Sermanet, S Reed, D Anguelov, D Erhan, V Vanhoucke, and A Rabinovich. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Sea Turtle Individual's Recognition

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      FAIML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
      April 2023
      296 pages
      ISBN:9798400707544
      DOI:10.1145/3616901
      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 March 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Artificial Intelligent
      2. Deep Learning
      3. Pattern Recognition
      4. Sea Turtle Identification

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia

      Conference

      FAIML 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 9
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media