skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590074acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved YOLOv5 UAV Target Detection Algorithm by Fused Attention Mechanism

Published: 29 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes a modified YOLOv5 UAV target detection algorithm for the low detection accuracy caused by the dense target distribution and too small size in the UAV image. Firstly, the coordinate attention mechanism (Coordinate Attention, CA) is introduced in the backbone network CSPDarknet53 to enhance the feature extraction capability of the network; secondly, the multi-size feature pyramid network is designed to introduce a larger resolution feature map for feature fusion and prediction, and to improve the accuracy of small target detection. Experiments on the VisDrone2021 dataset, the results show that the average detection accuracy (Mean Average Precision, mAP) of the improved YOLOv5 algorithm reached 43.0%, 5.8 percentage points higher than the original algorithm, which fully proves the high efficiency of the proposed improved algorithm on the ground target detection of the UAV.

References

[1]
Liu Pengfei, Zhou Hai, Feng Shuichun, Bian Chunjiang. Multi-scale low-altitude UAV detection based on a modified SSD [J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2021,42 (11): 3277-3285.
[2]
Zou Z, Shi Z, Guo Y, Object detection in 20 years: A survey[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 1905.05055, 2019.
[3]
Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Ssd: Single shot multibox detector [C]//European conference on computer vision.Springer, Cham, 2016: 21-37.
[4]
Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, Focal loss for dense object detection[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision.2017: 2980-2988.
[5]
Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.2016: 779-788.
[6]
Redmon J, Farhadi A.YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.2017: 7263-7271.
[7]
Redmon J, Farhadi A.Yolov3: An incremental improvement[J].arXiv preprint arXiv: 1804. 02767, 2018.
[8]
Bochkovskiy A, Wang C Y, Liao H Y M.Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934, 2020.
[9]
Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J].Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, 28: 91-99.
[10]
Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.2014: 580-587.
[11]
Girshick R.Fast r-cnn[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision.2015: 1440-1448.
[12]
He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Mask r-cnn[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision.2017: 2961-2969.
[13]
Yang Jianxiu, Xie Xuemei, Shi Guangming, Li Fu. The feature information-enhanced UAV real-time vehicle detection algorithm [J / OL]. Signal processing: 1-15 [2021-12-20]
[14]
Zhang Ruiqian, Shao Zhenfeng, Aleksei Portnov, Wang Jiaming. UAV image object detection method for multiscale void convolution [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Science Information Science Edition, 2020,45 (6): 895-903.
[15]
Ma Jun, Yao Zhen, Xu Cuifeng, Multi-UAV real-time tracking algorithm based on the improved PP-YOLO and Deep-SORT [J]. Computer Application, 2021:1-10.
[16]
Liu Fang, Pu Zhaohui, Zhang Shuichao. UAV Multi-object Tracking Algorithm based on attention feature fusion [J]. Control and Decision-making, 2021:1-9.
[17]
Zheng Z, Wang P, Liu W, Distance-IoU loss: Faster and better learning for bounding box regression[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2020, 34(07): 12993-13000.
[18]
Hou Q, Zhou D, Feng J.Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2021: 13713-13722.
[19]
Liu S, Qi L, Qin H, Path aggregation network for instance segmentation [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.2018: 8759-8768.
[20]
Cao Y, He Z, Wang L, VisDrone-DET2021: The Vision Meets Drone Object detection Challenge Results[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.2021: 2847-2854.
[21]
Lin T Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Microsoft coco: Common objects in context[C]//European conference on computer vision.Springer, Cham, 2014: 740-755.

Index Terms

  1. Improved YOLOv5 UAV Target Detection Algorithm by Fused Attention Mechanism
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
      March 2023
      598 pages
      ISBN:9781450399449
      DOI:10.1145/3590003
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 29 May 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Coordinate Attention
      2. UAV target detection, multi-scale feature pyramid
      3. YOLOv5

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      CACML 2023

      Acceptance Rates

      CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 58
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media