skip to main content
10.1145/3571785.3574122acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Role Modeling as a Computing Educator in Higher Education: A Focus on Care, Emotions and Professional Competencies

Published: 29 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides insights into role modeling by educators in computing that is beyond the technical, theoretical and rational perspectives which have historically been described as dominant in computing. Surveying 199 educators in higher education, we have built on frameworks of role modeling, care, emotions, and professional competencies as a lens to see different ways of engaging in computing.
Our quantitative and qualitative findings show how educators model ways of caring (for oneself, other humans and living species, technology, and the planet), emotions, professional competencies and other types of role modeling. Examples of contexts within computing and reasons why an educator can(not) model these aspects bring new light to research on care and emotions being shown in computing.
This work contributes to a better understanding of computing educators as potential role models, particularly in terms of displaying emotions and various types of care. Our work can support ways of developing the professional competences of computing educators and the teaching culture of computing departments. Our findings may inspire other educators to think about their own display of emotions and care, and what this transmits to their students. Thus, the work also contributes to the discussion of ways to increase diversity among students and equitable access to computing education.

References

[1]
Stefania Barca. 2020. Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene 1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878371
[2]
Jonathan Black, Paul Curzon, Chrystie Myketiak, and Peter W McOwan. 2011. A study in engaging female students in computer science using role models. In Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, 63--67.
[3]
Sarah Jane Bork and Joi-Lynn Mondisa. 2022. Engineering graduate students' mental health: A scoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 111, 3 (2022), 665--702.
[4]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[5]
Alison Clear, Allen Parrish, John Impagliazzo, Pearl Wang, Paolo Ciancarini, Ernesto Cuadros-Vargas, Stephen Frezza, Judith Gal-Ezer, Arnold Pears, Shingo Takada, Heikki Topi, Gerrit van der Veer, Abhijat Vichare, Les Waguespack, and Ming Zhang. 2020. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula. Technical Report. Association for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/cc2020.pdf.
[6]
Andrea Danyluk and Paul Leidig. 2021. Computing Competencies for Undergraduate Data Science Curricula. Technical Report. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/dstf_ccdsc2021.pdf.
[7]
Steve Easterbrook. 2014. From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking:. (2014), 10.
[8]
Elina Eriksson, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Daniel Pargman, Bjorn Hedin, Minna Laurell-Thorslund, and Sandra Sjoo. 2022. Addressing Students' Eco-anxiety when Teaching Sustainability in Higher Education. In 2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S). IEEE, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 88--98. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4S55073.2022.00020
[9]
Berenice Fisher and Joan C. Tronto. 1991. Toward a Feminist Theory of Care. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives, Emily Abel and Margaret Nelson (Eds.). New York Press.
[10]
PISA Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2018. Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The OECD PISA Global Competency Framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2018-global-competence.htm
[11]
Stephen Frezza, Mats Daniels, Arnold Pears, Åsa Cajander, Viggo Kann, Amanpreet Kapoor, Roger McDermott, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mihaela Sabin, and Charles Wallace. 2018. Modelling competencies for computing education beyond 2020: a research based approach to defining competencies in the computing disciplines. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 148--174.
[12]
Donald E Gibson. 2003. Developing the professional self-concept: Role model construals in early, middle, and late career stages. Organization Science, Vol. 14, 5 (2003), 591--610.
[13]
Donald E Gibson. 2004. Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 65, 1 (2004), 134--156.
[14]
Jessica R Gladstone and Andrei Cimpian. 2021. Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM. International journal of STEM education, Vol. 8, 1 (2021), 1--20.
[15]
Virginia Grande. 2018. Lost for Words! Defining the Language Around Role Models in Engineering Education. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (FIE 2018). San Jose, USA.
[16]
Virginia Grande, Anders Berglund, and Mats Daniels. 2017. Experiences of teachers in computing as role models: a phenomenographic study. In Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. ACM, 133--137.
[17]
Virginia Grande, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mats Daniels, and Matti Tedre. 2018. “Participating Under the Influence”: How Role Models Affect the Computing Discipline, Profession, and Student Population. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (FIE 2018). San Jose, USA.
[18]
Kristin L. Gunckel and Sara Tolbert. 2018. The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 55, 7 (2018), 938--961. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21458 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.21458.
[19]
Gerda Hagenauer, Michaela Gl"aser-Zikuda, and Simone E Volet. 2016. University Teachers' Perceptions of Appropriate Emotion Display and High-Quality Teacher-Student Relationship: Similarities and Differences across Cultural-Educational Contexts. Frontline Learning Research, Vol. 4, 3 (2016), 44--74.
[20]
Anne-Katrin Holfelder. 2019. Towards a sustainable future with education? Sustainability science, Vol. 14, 4 (2019), 943--952.
[21]
Robert Kordts-Freudinger. 2017. Feel, Think, Teach--Emotional Underpinnings of Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 6, 1 (2017), 217--229.
[22]
Thom Kunkeler. 2022. Inequality in Computing Education through the lens of Social Capital: a Methodology. In The United Kingdom and Ireland Computing Education Research (UKICER) Conference. 1--1.
[23]
Catharina Landström. 2007. Queering feminist technology studies. Feminist Theory, Vol. 8, 1 (April 2007), 7--26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107074193
[24]
Paul Leidig, Hannu DSalmel, Greg Anderson, Jeffry Babb, Carina de Villiers, Lesley Gardner, Jay F. Nunamaker Jr, Brenda Scholtz, Venky Shahkararaman, Raja Sooriamurthi, and Mark thouin. 2020. CIS2020. A competency Model for undergraduate Programs in Information Systems. Technical Report. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://is2020.hosting2.acm.org/2021/06/01/is2020-final-draft-released/.
[25]
Amari N. Lewis, Joe Gibbs Politz, Kristen Vaccaro, and Mia Minnes. 2022. Learning about the Experiences of Chicano/Latino Students in a Large Undergraduate CS Program. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1 (Dublin, Ireland) (ITiCSE '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165--171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.3524780
[26]
Simon L. Lewis and Mark A. Maslin. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, Vol. 519, 7542 (March 2015), 171--180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 Number: 7542 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
[27]
Johanna Lönngren, Tom Adawi, Maria Berge, James Huff, Homero Murzi, Inês Direito, Roland Tormey, and Ulrika Sultan. 2020a. Emotions in engineering education: Towards a research agenda. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273951
[28]
Johanna Lönngren, Tom Adawi, Maria Berge, James Huff, Homero Murzi, Inês Direito, Roland Tormey, and Ulrika Sultan. 2020b. Emotions in engineering education: Towards a research agenda. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273951 ISSN: 2377--634X.
[29]
Langalibalele H Mabuza, Indiran Govender, Gboyega A Ogunbanjo, and Bob Mash. 2014. African primary care research: Qualitative data analysis and writing results. African journal of primary health care & family medicine, Vol. 6, 1 (2014), 1--5.
[30]
Joanna R Macy and Chris Johnstone. 2022. Active Hope. How to Face the Mess We're in with Unexpected Resilience and Creative Power. New World Library.
[31]
Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer J. Holme, and Kimberli Nao. 2010. Stuck in the Shallow End; Education, Race and Computing. MIT Press.
[32]
Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
[33]
Clare Mariskind. 2014. Teachers' care in higher education: contesting gendered constructions. Gender and Education, Vol. 26, 3 (2014), 306--320.
[34]
Nicholas Mays and Catherine Pope. 2000. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Bmj, Vol. 320, 7226 (2000), 50--52.
[35]
Riitta-Leena Mets"apelto, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Mirva Heikkil"a, Jukka Husu, Anu Laine, Kristiina Lappalainen, Marko L"ahteenm"aki, Mirjamaija Mikkil"a-Erdmann, Anu Warinowski, Tuike Iiskala, et al. 2022. A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, Vol. 34, 2 (2022), 143--172.
[36]
Diane P. Michelfelder and Sharon A. Jones. 2016. From Caring About Sustainability to Developing Care-Ful Engineers. World Sustainability Series (2016), 173--184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--32933--8_16 ISBN: 9783319329338.
[37]
National Research Council. 2012. Education for Life and Work : Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
[38]
N. Noddings. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley. University of California Press.
[39]
N. Noddings. 2013. Caring. A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley. University of California Press.
[40]
Maria Ojala. 2016. Facing Anxiety in Climate Change Education: From Therapeutic Practice to Hopeful Transgressive Learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), Vol. 21, 0 (2016), 41--56. https://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/article/view/1393 Number: 0.
[41]
Maria Ojala. 2017. Hope and anticipation in education for a sustainable future. Futures, Vol. 94 (Nov. 2017), 76--84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.10.004
[42]
Deborah Osberg. 2010. Taking Care of the Future? The complex responsibility of education & politics. In Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education, Deborah Osberg and Gert Biesta (Eds.). Sense Publishers, 157--170.
[43]
Andreas Ottemo. 2015. Kön, kropp, begär och teknik passion och instrumentalitet på två tekniska högskoleprogram. Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39621 OCLC: 943199537.
[44]
Andreas Ottemo, Maria Berge, and Eva Silfver. 2020. Contextualizing technology: Between gender pluralization and class reproduction. Science Education, Vol. 104, 4 (July 2020), 693--713. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21576
[45]
Reinhard Pekrun, Thomas Goetz, Wolfram Titz, and Raymond P Perry. 2002. Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, Vol. 37, 2 (2002), 91--105.
[46]
Reinhard Pekrun and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2012. Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, 259--282.
[47]
Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2017. Learning Computing at University: Participation and Identity: A Longitudinal Study. PhD Thesis. Uppsala University, Sweden.
[48]
Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2018. Students' experience of participation in a discipline-a longitudinal study of computer science and IT engineering students. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Vol. 19, 1 (2018), 1--28.
[49]
Anne-Kathrin Peters, Stefan Bengtsson, Åsa Cajander, Mats Daniels, Virginia Grande, Johanna Lönngren, and Minna Salminen-Karlsson. 2020. Care ethics to develop computing and engineering education for sustainability. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--4.
[50]
Panu Pihkala. 2020. Eco-Anxiety and Environmental Education. sustainability (2020), 38.
[51]
Ian Pollock, Bedour Alshaigy, Andrew Bradley, Birgit R Krogstie, Viraj Kumar, Linda Ott, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Charles Riedesel, and Charles Wallace. 2019. 1.5 Degrees of Separation: Computer Science Education in the Age of the Anthropocene. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 1--25.
[52]
Rajendra Raj, Amruth N. Kumar, Mihaela Sabin, and John Impagliazzo. 2022. Interpreting the ABET Computer Science Criteria Using Competencies. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499293
[53]
Rajendra K. Raj, Mihaela Sabin, John Impagliazzo, David Bowers, Mats Daniels, Felienne Hermans, Natalie Kiesler, Amruth N. Kumar, Bonnie MacKellar, Renée McCauley, Syed Waqar Nabi, and Michael Oudshoorn. 2021. Professional Competencies in Computing Education : Pedagogies and Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, Virtual Event Germany, 133--161.
[54]
Bente Rasmussen and Tove Håpnes. 1991. Excluding women from the technologies of the future? Futures, Vol. 23, 10 (1991), 1107--1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016--3287(91)90075-D Number: 10.
[55]
Emma Riese. 2022. Perspectives on Assessment in Introductory Computer Science Courses: Exploring and Comparing Experiences of Students, Teaching Assistants, and Course Coordinators. Ph.,D. Dissertation. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
[56]
Emma Riese and Viggo Kann. 2022. Training Teaching Assistants by Offering an Introductory Course. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 745--751.
[57]
Emma Riese, Madeleine Lorras, Martin Ukrop, and Tomávs Effenberger. 2021. Challenges Faced by Teaching Assistants in Computer Science Education Across Europe. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (Virtual Event, Germany) (ITiCSE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 547--553. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456304
[58]
Emma Riese and Stefan Stenbom. 2020. Experiences of Assessment in Introductory Programming From the Perspective of NonComputer Science Majors. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--9.
[59]
Emma Riese and Stefan Stenbom. 2022. Engineering Students' Experiences of Assessment in Introductory Computer Science Courses. (2022). (Manuscript).
[60]
Donna Riley. 2013. Hidden in Plain View: Feminists Doing Engineering Ethics, Engineers Doing Feminist Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 19, 1 (2013), 189--206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011--9320-0 Number: 1.
[61]
Mihaela Sabin, Hala Alrumaih, John Impagliazzo, Barry Lunt, Ming Zhang, Brenda Byers, William Newhouse, Bill Paterson, Svetlana Peltsverger, Cara Tang, Gerrit van der Veer, and Barbara Viola. 2017. Information Technology Curricula 2017 (IT2017). Technical Report. ACM/IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3173161.
[62]
Minna Salminen-Karlsson. 2011a. The problem in the eye of the beholder: Working with gender reforms in computer engineering. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 2 (2011), 445--459.
[63]
Minna Salminen-Karlsson. 2011b. The problem in the eye of the beholder: Working with gender reforms in computer engineering. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 2 (July 2011), 445--459. http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/164 Number: 2.
[64]
Matilde Sánchez-Pe na and Julianna Gesun. 2022. Work-In-Progress: Exploring the wellness perceptions of engineering and science faculty. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
[65]
Matilde Sanchez-Pe na, Joyce Main, Nikitha Sambamurthy, Monica Cox, and Ebony McGee. 2016. The factors affecting the persistence of Latina faculty: A literature review using the intersectionality of race, gender, and class. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--9.
[66]
Matilde Sánchez-Pe na, Xinrui Rose Xu, Nichole Ramirez, and Nikitha Sambamurthy. 2019. Engineering students and professionals living with a mental illness: an exploration of their experiences and challenges. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--5.
[67]
Matilde Luz Sánchez-Pe na, Nichole Ramirez, Xinrui Rose Xu, and Douglas B Samuel. 2021. Work in Progress: Measuring Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and Its Impact in Help-seeking Behaviors Among Engineering Students. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
[68]
Kate Scantlebury. 2014. Gender Matters. Building on the Past, Recognizing the Present, and Looking Toward the Future. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell (Eds.). Routledge.
[69]
Allison Scott, Alexis Martin, Frieda McAlear, and Sonia Koshy. 2017. Broadening participation in computing: examining experiences of girls of color. ACM Inroads, Vol. 8, 4 (2017), 48--52.
[70]
Stephen Secules, Cassandra McCall, Joel Alejandro Mejia, Chanel Beebe, Adam S Masters, Matilde L. Sánchez-Pe na, and Martina Svyantek. 2021. Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 110, 1 (2021), 19--43.
[71]
Kultar Singh. 2007. Quantitative social research methods. Sage.
[72]
Sharon Stein, Vanessa Andreotti, Rene Suvsa, Cash Ahenakew, and Tereza vCajková. 2022. From "Education for Sustainable Development" to "Education for the End of the World as We Know It". Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 54, 3 (2022), 274--287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1835646
[73]
Isak Stoddard, Kevin Anderson, Stuart Capstick, Wim Carton, Joanna Depledge, Keri Facer, Clair Gough, Frederic Hache, Claire Hoolohan, Martin Hultman, Niclas Hällström, Sivan Kartha, Sonja Klinsky, Magdalena Kuchler, Eva Lövbrand, Naghmeh Nasiritousi, Peter Newell, Glen P Peters, Youba Sokona, Andy Stirling, Matthew Stilwell, Clive L Spash, and Mariama Williams. 2021. Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve? (2021), 37.
[74]
Ella Taylor-Smith, Camilla Barnett, Sally Smith, Matthew Barr, and Carron Shankland. 2022. Participant-centred planning Framework for effective gender balance activities in tech. In The United Kingdom and Ireland Computing Education Research (UKICER) Conference. 1--7.
[75]
Ehsan Toraby and Ghasem Modarresi. 2018. EFL Teachers' Emotions and Learners' Views of Teachers' Pedagogical Success. International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 11, 2 (2018), 513--526.
[76]
Joan C Tronto. 1993 a. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Psychology Press.
[77]
Joan C. Tronto. 1993 b. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Routledge.
[78]
Maria K. Udén. 2017. Implementing feminist theory in engineering: obstacles within the gender studies tradition. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 42, 3 (May 2017), 336--348. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1209461
[79]
Amanda R Van Camp, Patricia N Gilbert, and Laurie T O'Brien. 2019. Testing the effects of a role model intervention on women's STEM outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, Vol. 22, 3 (2019), 649--671.
[80]
Tina Vrieler and Minna Salminen-Karlsson. 2021. A Sociocultural Perspective on Computer Science Capital and its Pedagogical Implications in Computer Science Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (2021).
[81]
Tiffani L. Williams. 2022. The Lives of Hidden Figures Matter in Computer Science Education. Commun. ACM, Vol. 65, 2 (jan 2022), 20--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506577
[82]
Kathryn E Wohlford, John E Lochman, and Tammy D Barry. 2004. The relation between chosen role models and the self-esteem of men and women. Sex Roles, Vol. 50, 7--8 (2004), 575--582.
[83]
WWF. 2020. Living Planet Report 2020. https://www.wwf.se/rapport/living-planet-report/
[84]
Sabrina Zirkel. 2002. Is there a place for me? Role models and academic identity among white students and students of color. Teachers College Record, Vol. 104, 2 (2002), 357--376. io

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Role Modeling as a Computing Educator in Higher Education: A Focus on Care, Emotions and Professional Competencies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE-WGR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    December 2022
    299 pages
    ISBN:9798400700101
    DOI:10.1145/3571785
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 December 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. care
    2. educator
    3. emotions
    4. higher education
    5. professional competencies
    6. role model
    7. sustainability
    8. teacher

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation - Computer and Information Science and Engineering (NSE-CISE)
    • Center for Teaching and Learning at University of Massachusetts Amherst (SoTL Professional Development Award)

    Conference

    ITiCSE 2022
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)186
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Understanding the role models that inspire women to study Computing ScienceProceedings of the 2024 Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research10.1145/3689535.3689557(1-7)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Role Perceptions and Motivational Orientation of Computer Science TeachersProceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3677619.3678118(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Where's the Data? Finding and Reusing Datasets in Computing EducationWorking Group Reports on 2023 ACM Conference on Global Computing Education10.1145/3598579.3689378(31-60)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2024
    • (2023)The virtuous, the caring, and the free: ethical theory to understand the ethics of the teacher as a role model in engineering educationEuropean Journal of Engineering Education10.1080/03043797.2023.223695949:1(1-21)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media