skip to main content
10.1145/3559613.3563194acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Fisher Information as a Utility Metric for Frequency Estimation under Local Differential Privacy

Published: 07 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is the de facto standard technique to ensure privacy for users whose data is collected by a data aggregator they do not necessarily trust. This necessarily involves a tradeoff between user privacy and aggregator utility, and an important question is to optimize utility (under a given metric) for a given privacy level. Unfortunately, existing utility metrics are either hard to optimize for, or they only indirectly relate to an aggregator's goal, leading to theoretically optimal protocols that are unsuitable in practice. In this paper, we introduce a new utility metric for when the aggregator tries to estimate the true data's distribution in a finite set. The new metric is based on Fisher information, which expresses the aggregators information gain through the protocol. We show that this metric relates to other utility metrics such as estimator accuracy and mutual information and to the LDP parameter \varepsilon. Furthermore, we show that under this metric, we can approximate the optimal protocols as \varepsilon \rightarrow 0 and \varepsilon \rightarrow \infty, and we show how the optimal protocol can be found for a fixed \varepsilon, although the latter is computationally infeasible for large input spaces.

References

[1]
Apple Differential Privacy Team. 2017. Learning with Privacy at Scale.
[2]
Leighton Pate Barnes, Wei-Ning Chen, and Ayfer Özgür. 2020. Fisher information under local differential privacy. (2020). Preprint, arXiv:2005.10783.
[3]
Leighton Pate Barnes and Ayfer Özgür. 2021. Fisher Information and Mutual Information Constraints. (2021). Preprint, arXiv:2102.05802.
[4]
Bertrand S. Clarke and Andrew R. Barron. 1990. Entropy Risk and the Bayesian Central Limit Theorem. (1990). Technical Report #91--56, Department of Statistics, Purdue University.
[5]
Harald Cramér. 1999. Mathematical methods of statistics. Vol. 43. Princeton university press.
[6]
Bolin Ding, Janardhan Kulkarni, and Sergey Yekhanin. 2017. Collecting telemetry data privately. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3571--3580.
[7]
Jiu Ding and Aihui Zhou. 2007. Eigenvalues of rank-one updated matrices with some applications. Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 20, 12 (2007), 1223--1226.
[8]
John C Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. 2013. Local privacy and statistical minimax rates. In 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 429--438.
[9]
Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. 2006. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of cryptography conference. Springer, 265--284.
[10]
Úlfar Erlingsson, Vasyl Pihur, and Aleksandra Korolova. 2014. Rappor: Randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 1054--1067.
[11]
Jinyuan Jia and Neil Zhenqiang Gong. 2019. Calibrate: Frequency estimation and heavy hitter identification with local differential privacy via incorporating prior knowledge. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2008--2016.
[12]
Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, and Pramod Viswanath. 2014. Extremal mechanisms for local differential privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.1338 (2014).
[13]
Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Homin K Lee, Kobbi Nissim, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Adam Smith. 2011. What can we learn privately? SIAM J. Comput., Vol. 40, 3 (2011), 793--826.
[14]
Milan Lopuha"a-Zwakenberg, Zitao Li, Boris vS korić, and Ninghui Li. 2020. Improving Frequency Estimation under Local Differential Privacy. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. 123--135.
[15]
Milan Lopuha"a-Zwakenberg, Boris vS korić, and Ninghui Li. 2019. Information-theoretic metrics for Local Differential Privacy protocols. arXiv:1910.07826 (2019). Preprint.
[16]
Zhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil, Xiaokui Xiao, and Kui Ren. 2016. Heavy hitter estimation over set-valued data with local differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 192--203.
[17]
C Radhakrishna Rao. 1945. Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Reson. J. Sci. Educ, Vol. 20 (1945), 78--90.
[18]
Jack Sherman and Winifred J Morrison. 1950. Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 21, 1 (1950), 124--127.
[19]
Aad van der Vaart. 2000. Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge university press.
[20]
Shaowei Wang, Liusheng Huang, Pengzhan Wang, Yiwen Nie, Hongli Xu, Wei Yang, Xiang-Yang Li, and Chunming Qiao. 2016. Mutual information optimally local private discrete distribution estimation. arXiv:1607.08025 (2016).
[21]
Tianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, and Somesh Jha. 2017. Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency Estimation. In 26th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 16--18, 2017. 729--745. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity17/technical-sessions/presentation/wang-tianhao
[22]
Tianhao Wang, Milan Lopuha"a -Zwakenberg, Zitao Li, Boris vSkorić, and Ninghui Li. 2020. Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation with Consistency. In 27th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS 2020, San Diego, California, USA, February 23--26, 2020. The Internet Society. https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss-paper/locally-differentially-private-frequency-estimation-with-consistency/
[23]
Stanley L Warner. 1965. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Vol. 60, 309 (1965), 63--69.
[24]
Mengmeng Yang, Lingjuan Lyu, Jun Zhao, Tianqing Zhu, and Kwok-Yan Lam. 2020. Local differential privacy and its applications: A comprehensive survey. arXiv:2008.03686 (2020). Preprint.
[25]
Min Ye and Alexander Barg. 2018. Optimal schemes for discrete distribution estimation under locally differential privacy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 64, 8 (2018), 5662--5676. io

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Fisher Information as a Utility Metric for Frequency Estimation under Local Differential Privacy

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WPES'22: Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society
      November 2022
      227 pages
      ISBN:9781450398732
      DOI:10.1145/3559613
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 November 2022

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. fisher information
      2. local differential privacy
      3. optimalization
      4. utility metrics

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      CCS '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 106 of 355 submissions, 30%

      Upcoming Conference

      CCS '24
      ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
      October 14 - 18, 2024
      Salt Lake City , UT , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)119
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media