skip to main content
10.1145/3534678.3539154acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reinforcement Learning-based Placement of Charging Stations in Urban Road Networks

Published: 14 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The transition from conventional mobility to electromobility largely depends on charging infrastructure availability and optimal placement. This paper examines the optimal placement of charging stations in urban areas. We maximise the charging infrastructure supply over the area and minimise waiting, travel, and charging times while setting budget constraints. Moreover, we include the possibility of charging vehicles at home to obtain a more refined estimation of the actual charging demand throughout the urban area. We formulate the Placement of Charging Stations problem as a non-linear integer optimisation problem that seeks the optimal positions for charging stations and the optimal number of charging piles of different charging types. We design a novel Deep Reinforcement Learning approach to solve the charging station placement problem (PCRL). Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show how the PCRL reduces the waiting and travel time while increasing the benefit of the charging plan compared to five baselines. Compared to the existing infrastructure, we can reduce the waiting time by up to 97% and increase the benefit up to 497%.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
The transition from conventional mobility to electromobility largely depends on the management of charging infrastructure. We examine the optimal placement of charging stations in urban areas and include the possibility of charging vehicles at home to estimate the actual charging demand. We formulate the Placement of Charging Stations problem as a non-linear integer optimisation problem. Moreover, we design a novel Deep Reinforcement Learning approach to solve it. We conduct extensive experiments on real road network datasets.

References

[1]
2022. Open Charge Map. Retrieved June 9, 2022 from https://openchargemap.org
[2]
2022. OpenStreetMap. Retrieved June 9, 2022 from https://openstreetmap.org
[3]
Sangjun Bae, Inmo Jang, Sébastien Gros, Balázs Kulcsár, and Jonas Hellgren. 2022. A Game Approach for Charging Station Placement Based on User Preferences and Crowdedness. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23, 4 (2022).
[4]
Geoff Boeing. 2017. OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65 (2017).
[5]
Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2016. OpenAI Gym. arXiv:1606.01540
[6]
Woongchul Choi. 2020. Placement of Charging Infrastructures for EVs using K-Mean Algorithm and its Validation using Real Usage Data. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 7 (2020).
[7]
Qiushi Cui, Yang Weng, and Chin-Woo Tan. 2019. Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement Method for Urban Areas. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10, 6 (2019).
[8]
Bowen Du, Yongxin Tong, Zimu Zhou, Qian Tao, and Wenjun Zhou. 2018. Demand-Aware Charger Planning for Electric Vehicle Sharing. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD (2018).
[9]
Xiaoying Gan, Haoxiang Zhang, Gai Hang, Zhida Qin, and Haiming Jin. 2020. Fast-Charging Station Deployment Considering Elastic Demand. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrification 6, 1 (2020).
[10]
David L. Greene, Eleftheria Kontou, Brennan Borlaug, Aaron Brooker, and Matteo Muratori. 2020. Public charging infrastructure for plug-in electric vehicles: What is it worth? Transp. Res. D 78 (2020).
[11]
Timo Krallmann, Martin Doering, Marek Stess, Timo Graen, and Michael Nolting. 2018. Multi-objective optimization of charging infrastructure to improve suitability of commercial drivers for electric vehicles using real travel data. IEEE EAIS) (2018).
[12]
Chen Liu, Ke Deng, Chaojie Li, Jianxin Li, Yanhua Li, and Jun Luo. 2016. The Optimal Distribution of Electric-Vehicle Chargers across a City. IEEE 16th ICDM (2016).
[13]
Qi Liu, Jiahao Liu, Weiwei Le, Zhaoxia Guo, and Zhenggang He. 2019. Datadriven intelligent location of public charging stations for electric vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 232 (2019).
[14]
Qiyu Liu, Yuxiang Zeng, Lei Chen, and Xiuwen Zheng. 2019. Social-Aware Optimal Electric Vehicle Charger Deployment on Road Network. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL (2019).
[15]
Xuyao Meng, Weige Zhang, Yan Bao, Yian Yan, Ruiming Yuan, Zhen Chen, and JingXin Li. 2020. Sequential construction planning of electric taxi charging stations considering the development of charging demand. J. Clean. Prod. 259 (2020).
[16]
Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Alex Graves, Ioannis Antonoglou, Daan Wierstra, and Martin Riedmiller. 2013. Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:1312.5602
[17]
Abood Mourad and Martin Hennebel. 2020. The Optimal Deployment of Recharging Stations for Electric Vehicles Based on Mobility Flows and Electric Grid Specifications. IEEE ISGT-Europe (2020).
[18]
Antonin Raffin, Ashley Hill, Adam Gleave, Anssi Kanervisto, Maximilian Ernestus, and Noah Dormann. 2021. Stable-Baselines3: Reliable Reinforcement Learning Implementations. J Mach Learn Res 22, 268 (2021).
[19]
Chenxi Sun, Tongxin Li, and Xiaoying Tang. 2021. Data-driven Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement for Incentivizing Potential Demand. IEEE SmartGridComm (2021).
[20]
Felix Tuchnitz, Niklas Ebell, Jonas Schlund, and Marco Pruckner. 2021. Development and Evaluation of a Smart Charging Strategy for an Electric Vehicle Fleet Based on Reinforcement Learning. Appl. Energy 285 (2021).
[21]
Mohammad M. Vazifeh, Hongmou Zhang, Paolo Santi, and Carlo Ratti. 2019. Optimizing the deployment of electric vehicle charging stations using pervasive mobility data. Transp. Res. A 121 (2019).
[22]
Lei Xu, Hasan Ümitcan Yilmaz, Zongfei Wang, Witold-Roger Poganietz, and Patrick Jochem. 2020. Greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in Europe considering different charging strategies. Transp. Res. D 87 (2020).
[23]
Li Zeng, Timo Krallmann, Andrea Fiege, Marek Stess, Timo Graen, and Michael Nolting. 2020. Optimization of future charging infrastructure for commercial electric vehicles using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and real travel data. Evol. Syst. 11 (2020).
[24]
Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, Fan Wang, Tong Xu, Haoran Xin, Dejing Dou, and Hui Xiong. 2021. Intelligent Electric Vehicle Charging Recommendation Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the WWW (2021).
[25]
Zhenli Zhao, Lihui Zhang, Meng Yang, Jianxue Chai, and Songrui Li. 2020. Pricing for private charging pile sharing considering EV consumers based on noncooperative game model. J. Clean. Prod. 254 (2020).
[26]
Simon Árpád Funke, Frances Sprei, Till Gnann, and Patrick Plötz. 2019. How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Trans. Res. D 77 (2019).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '22: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
August 2022
5033 pages
ISBN:9781450393850
DOI:10.1145/3534678
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 August 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. electromobility
  2. location selection
  3. reinforcement learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), Germany
  • DFG, German Research Foundation
  • European Commission
  • Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), Germany

Conference

KDD '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)169
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media