research-article

Public Access

“It Would Be Cool to Get Stampeded by Dinosaurs”: Analyzing Children's Conceptual Model of AR Headsets Through Co-Design

Authors:

Julia Woodward,

Natalia E. López Adames,

Jaime RuizAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 152, Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501979

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Children are being presented with augmented reality (AR) in different contexts, such as education and gaming. However, little is known about how children conceptualize AR, especially AR headsets. Prior work has shown that children's interaction behaviors and expectations of technological devices can be quite different from adults’. It is important to understand children's mental models of AR headsets to design more effective experiences for them. To elicit children's perceptions, we conducted four participatory design sessions with ten children on designing content for imaginary AR headsets. We found that children expect AR systems to be highly intelligent and to recognize and virtually transform surroundings to create immersive environments. Also, children are in favor of using these devices for difficult tasks but prefer to work on their own for easy tasks. Our work contributes new understanding on how children comprehend AR headsets and provides recommendations for designing future headsets for children.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491102.3501979-talk-video.mp4)

Talk Video

Download
89.15 MB

References

[1]

Haifa Alhumaidan, Kathy Pui Ying Lo, and Andrew Selby. 2018. Co-designing with Children a Collaborative Augmented Reality Book Based on a Primary School Textbook. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 15: 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCCI.2017.11.005

[2]

Aishat Aloba, Annie Luc, Julia Woodward, Yuzhu Dong, Rong Zhang, Eakta Jain, and Lisa Anthony. 2019. Quantifying Differences Between Child and Adult Motion Based on Gait Features. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII ’19), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23563-5_31

Digital Library

[3]

Troels L. Andersen, Sune Kristensen, Bjørn W. Nielsen, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2004. Designing an Augmented Reality Board Game with Children: The BattleBoard 3D Experience. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’04), 137–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017833.1017858

Digital Library

[4]

Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Jaye Nias, Berthel Tate, and Shreya Mohan. 2012. Interaction and Recognition Challenges in Interpreting Children's Touch and Gesture Input on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the ACM Interational Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS ’12), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396671

Digital Library

[5]

Deborah Bach. 2021. U.S. Army to use HoloLens technology in high-tech headsets for soldiers . Microsoft. Retrieved August 18, 2021 from https://news.microsoft.com/transform/u-s-army-to-use-hololens-technology-in-high-tech-headsets-for-soldiers/

[6]

Thomas Baumgartner, Dominique Speck, Denise Wettstein, Ornella Masnari, Gian Beeli, and Lutz Jäncke. 2008. Feeling Present in Arousing Virtual Reality Worlds: Prefrontal Brain Regions Differentially Orchestrate Presence Experience in Adults and Children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2: 12pp. https://doi.org/10.3389/NEURO.09.008.2008

[7]

Mathilde Bekker, Julie Beusmans, David Keyson, and Peter Lloyd. 2003. KidReporter: A User Requirements Gathering Technique for Designing with Children. Interacting with Computers 15, 2: 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00007-9

[8]

Erin Beneteau, Olivia K. Richards, Mingrui Zhang, Julie A. Kientz, Jason Yip, and Alexis Hiniker. 2019. Communication Breakdowns Between Families and Alexa. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 13pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300473

Digital Library

[9]

Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1999. Contextual design. Interactions 6, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291229

Digital Library

[10]

Anol Bhattacherjee. 2001. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 25, 3: 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Digital Library

[11]

Mark Billinghurst and Andreas Duenser. 2012. Augmented Reality in the Classroom. Computer 45, 7: 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111

Digital Library

[12]

Dawn Bowers and Kenneth M. Heilman. 1980. Pseudoneglect: Effects of Hemispace on a Tactile Line Bisection Task. Neuropsychologia 18, 4–5: 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7

[13]

Thomas J. Caruso, Martine Madill, Douglas Sidell, Kara Meister, Ellen Wang, Maria Menendez, Madison N. Kist, and Samuel Rodriguez. 2021. Using Augmented Reality to Reduce Fear and Promote Cooperation During Pediatric Otolaryngologic Procedures. The Laryngoscope 131, 4: E1342–E1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/LARY.29098

[14]

Brendan Cassidy, Gavin Sim, Matthew Horton, and Daniel Fitton. 2015. Participatory Design of Wearable Augmented Reality Display Elements for Children at Play. In Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC ’15), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEC.2015.7332699

[15]

Stephen D. Christman and Christopher L. Niebauer. 1997. The Relation Between Left-Right and Upper-Lower Visual Field Asymmetries: (Or: What Goes Up Goes Right While What's Left Lays Low). Advances in Psychology 123: 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80076-3

[16]

Crunchfish. 2017. Gesture Interaction in Industrial AR Smart Glasses. YouTube. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from https://youtu.be/_K9iCCx8zNg

[17]

Sidney K. D'Mello, Blair Lehman, and Art Graesser. 2011. A Motivationally Supportive Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor. New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies: 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_9

[18]

Christian Dindler, Eva Eriksson, Ole Sejer Iversen, Andreas Lykke-Olesen, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2005. Mission from Mars: A Method for Exploring User Requirements for Children in a Narrative Space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’05), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109546

Digital Library

[19]

Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’99), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303166

Digital Library

[20]

Allison Druin. 2002. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 1: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659

[21]

Allison Druin, Elizabeth Foss, Hilary Hutchinson, Evan Golub, and Leshell Hatley. 2010. Children's Roles Using Keyword Search Interfaces at Home. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753388

Digital Library

[22]

Melissa C. Duffy and Roger Azevedo. 2015. Motivation Matters: Interactions Between Achievement Goals and Agent Scaffolding for Self-Regulated Learning Within an Intelligent Tutoring System. Computers in Human Behavior 52: 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.05.041

Digital Library

[23]

Matt Dunleavy, Chris Dede, and Rebecca Mitchell. 2009. Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 18, 1: 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

[24]

Andreas Dünser and Eva Hornecker. 2007. Lessons from an AR Book Study. In International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI ’07), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227006

Digital Library

[25]

Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 1999. The Development of Children Ages 6 to 14. Future of Children 9, 2: 30–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602703

[26]

Lizbeth Escobedo, Monica Tentori, Eduardo Quintana, Jesus Favela, and Daniel Garcia-Rosas. 2014. Using Augmented Reality to Help Children with Autism Stay Focused. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 1: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.19

Digital Library

[27]

Eric Gans, David Roberts, Matthew Bennett, Herman Towles, Alberico Menozzi, James Cook, and Todd Sherrill. 2015. Augmented Reality Technology for Day/Night Situational Awareness for the Dismounted Soldier. In Display Technologies and Applications for Defense, Security, and Avionics, Article 9470. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2177086

[28]

Martha Grabowski. 2015. Research on Wearable, Immersive Augmented Reality (WIAR) Adoption in Maritime Navigation. Journal of Navigation 68, 3: 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463314000873

[29]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, Gene Chipman, Jerry Alan Fails, Sante Simms, and Allison Farber. 2004. Mixing Ideas: A New Technique for Working with Young Children as Design Partners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’04), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017833.1017838

Digital Library

[30]

Nick Haber, Catalin Voss, and Dennis Wall. 2020. Upgraded Google Glass Helps Autistic Kids “See” Emotions. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://spectrum.ieee.org/upgraded-google-glass-helps-autistic-kids-see-emotions/particle-8

[31]

Takuya Hashimoto, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Alex Polishuk, and Igor Verner. 2013. Elementary Science Lesson Delivered by Robot. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’13), 133–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483537

[32]

Tien Chi Huang, Chia Chen Chen, and Yu Wen Chou. 2016. Animating Eco-Education: To See, Feel, and Discover in an Augmented Reality-Based Experiential Learning Environment. Computers and Education 96: 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008

Digital Library

[33]

María Blanca Ibáñez and Carlos Delgado-Kloos. 2018. Augmented Reality for STEM Learning: A Systematic Review. Computers and Education 123: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

Digital Library

[34]

María Blanca Ibáñez, Ángela Di Serio, Diego Villarán, and Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2014. Experimenting with Electromagnetism Using Augmented Reality: Impact on Flow Student Experience and Educational Effectiveness. Computers and Education 71: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004

Digital Library

[35]

Eakta Jain, Lisa Anthony, Aishat Aloba, Amanda Castonguay, Isabella Cuba, Alex Shaw, and Julia Woodward. 2016. Is the Motion of a Child Perceivably Different from the Motion of an Adult? ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 13, 4: 17pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/2947616

Digital Library

[36]

Tina Jarvis and Léonie J. Rennie. 1998. Factors that Influence Children's Developing Perceptions of Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8, 3: 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008826320260

[37]

Jeff Johnson and Austin Henderson. 2002. Conceptual Models: Begin by Designing What to Design. Interactions 9, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/503355.503366

Digital Library

[38]

Joint Research Centre. 2015. Young Children (0-8) and Digital Technology: A Qualitative Exploratory Study Across Seven Countries. Retrieved August 18, 2021 from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239

[39]

Michael Jones, M. Jeannette Lawler, Eric Hintz, Nathan Bench, Fred Mangrubang, and Mallory Trullender. 2014. Head Mounted Displays and Deaf Children: Facilitating Sign Language in Challenging Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’14), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610481

Digital Library

[40]

M. Carmen Juan, Giacomo Toffetti, Francisco Abad, and Juan Cano. 2010. Tangible Cubes Used As The User Interface In An Augmented Reality Game for Edutainment. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT ’10), 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2010.170

Digital Library

[41]

Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’98) 7, 3–4: 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008689307411

Digital Library

[42]

D.W.F. van Krevelen and Ronald Poelman. 2010. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 9, 2: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1874.7929

[43]

Cathy P. Lachapelle, Christine M. Cunningham, and Yoonkyung Oh. 2018. What is Technology? Development and Evaluation of a Simple Instrument for Measuring Children's Conceptions of Technology. International Journal of Science Education 41, 2: 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1545101

[44]

Kung Jin Lee, Wendy Roldan, Tian Qi Zhu, and Harkiran Kaur Zhu. 2021. The Show Must Go On: A Conceptual Model of Conducting Synchronous Participatory Design with Children Online. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445715

Digital Library

[45]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry Revisited: Reflections of the Past and Guidelines for the Future of Intergenerational Co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003

[46]

D. Stephen Lindsay and Marcia K. Johnson. 1987. Reality Monitoring and Suggestibility: Children's Ability to Discriminate Among Memories From Different Sources. Children's Eyewitness Memory: 92–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6338-5_6

[47]

David Liu, Simon A. Jenkins, Penelope M. Sanderson, Marcus O. Watson, Terrence Leane, Amanda Kruys, and W John Russell. 2009. Monitoring with Head-Mounted Displays: Performance and Safety in a Full-Scale Simulator and Part-Task Trainer. Anesthesia & Analgesia 109, 4: 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5a200

[48]

Silvia B. Lovato, Anne Marie Piper, and Ellen A. Wartella. 2019. “Hey Google, do unicorns exist?”: Conversational Agents as a Path to Answers to Children's Questions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323150

Digital Library

[49]

Silvia Lovato and Anne Marie Piper. 2015. “Siri, is this you?”: Understanding Young Children's Interactions with Voice Input Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771910

Digital Library

[50]

Aristides Mairena, Carl Gutwin, and Andy Cockburn. 2019. Peripheral Notifications in Large Displays: Effects of Feature Combination and Task Interference. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19), 12pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300870

Digital Library

[51]

Elizabeth Maxwell. 1998. “I Can Do it Myself!” Reflections on Early Self‐Efficacy. Roeper Review 20, 3: 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553888

[52]

Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: Norms and Guidelines for CSCW and HCI Practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 23pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174

Digital Library

[53]

Lorna McKnight and Brendan Cassidy. 2010. Children's Interaction with Mobile Touch-Screen Devices. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 2, 2: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2010040101

Digital Library

[54]

Meta. Meta Augmented Reality. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from https://www.metavision.com/

[55]

Microsoft HoloLens. 2019. Introducing Microsoft HoloLens 2. YouTube. Retrieved December 8, 2021 from https://youtu.be/eqFqtAJMtYE?t=42

[56]

Kathrin Müller and Carsten Schulte. 2018. Are Children Perceiving Robots as Supporting or Replacing Humans? In Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE ’18), 4pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757

Digital Library

[57]

Brita Munsinger and John Quarles. 2019. Augmented Reality for Children in a Confirmation Task: Time, Fatigue, and Usability. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST ’19), 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364274

Digital Library

[58]

Brita Munsinger, Greg White, and John Quarles. 2019. The Usability of the Microsoft Hololens for an Augmented Reality Game to Teach Elementary School Children. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games ’19), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-Games.2019.8864548

[59]

Donald A. Norman. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books.

Digital Library

[60]

Patrick O'Shea, Rebecca Mitchell, Catherine Johnston, and Chris Dede. 2009. Lessons Learned about Designing Augmented Realities. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations 1, 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGCMS.2009010101

[61]

Lyn Pemberton and Marcus Winter. 2009. Collaborative Augmented Reality in Schools. In International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’09), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.5555/1599503.1599540

Digital Library

[62]

Gabrielle F. Principe and Eric Smith. 2008. The Tooth, The Whole Tooth and Nothing But The Tooth: How Belief in The Tooth Fairy Can Engender False Memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22, 5: 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ACP.1402

[63]

Iulian Radu, Betsy McCarthy, and Yvonne Kao. 2016. Discovering Educational Augmented Reality Math Applications by Prototyping with Elementary-School Teachers. In IEEE Virtual Reality (VR ’16), 271–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504758

[64]

E. Richard, V. Billaudeau, P. Richard, and G. Gaudin. 2007. Augmented Reality for Rehabilitation of Cognitive Disabled Children: A Preliminary Study. In Virtual Rehabilitation (IWVR ’07), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2007.4362148

[65]

Jochen Rick, Amanda Harris, Paul Marshall, Rowanne Fleck, Nicola Yuill, and Yvonne Rogers. 2009. Children Designing Together On A Multi-Touch Tabletop: An Analysis Of Spatial Orientation and User Interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’09), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551807

Digital Library

[66]

Daniel J. Ricks and Mark B. Colton. 2010. Trends and Considerations in Robot-Assisted Autism Therapy. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 4354–4359. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509327

[67]

Ned Sahin, Neha Keshav, Joseph Salisbury, and Arshya Vahabzadeh. 2018. Safety and Lack of Negative Effects of Wearable Augmented-Reality Social Communication Aid for Children and Adults with Autism. Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, 8: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080188

[68]

Gavin Sim, Brendan Cassidy, and Janet C. Read. 2018. Crowdsourcing Ideas for Augmented Reality Museum Experiences with Children. In Museum Experience Design., A. Vermeeren, L. Calvi and A. Sabiescu (eds.). Springer, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58550-5_4

[69]

Austen K. Smith, Izabela Szelest, Trista E. Friedrich, and Lorin J. Elias. 2014. Native Reading Direction Influences Lateral Biases in The Perception of Shape From Shading. Laterality 20, 4: 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2014.990975

[70]

Kiley Sobel. 2019. Future of Childhood Immersive Media and Child Development. Retrieved August 17, 2021 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598949.pdf

[71]

Erica Southgate, Shamus P. Smith, and Jill Scevak. 2017. Asking Ethical Questions in Research Using Immersive Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies with Children and Youth. In IEEE Virtual Reality (VR ’17), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892226

[72]

Nicole A. Thomas, Oliver Schneider, Carl Gutwin, and Lorin J. Elias. 2012. Dorsal Stream Contributions to Perceptual Asymmetries. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS 18, 2: 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711001585

[73]

Stella Vosniadou and William F Brewer. 1992. Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cognitive Psychology 24, 4: 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W

[74]

Greg Walsh. 2011. Distributed Participatory Design. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’2011), 1061–1064. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979696

Digital Library

[75]

Greg Walsh, Alison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Elizabeth Foss, Evan Golub, Leshell Hatley, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Sonia Franckel. 2010. Layered Elaboration: A New Technique for Co-design with Children. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), 1237–1240. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753512

Digital Library

[76]

Greg Walsh, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. FACIT PD: A Framework for Analysis and Creation of Intergenerational Techniques for Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 2893–2902. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481400

Digital Library

[77]

Julia Woodward, Lisa Anthony, Germaine Irwin, Alex Shaw, Annie Luc, Brittany Craig, Juthika Das, Phillip Hall, Akshay Holla, Danielle Sikich, and Quincy Brown. 2016. Characterizing How Interface Complexity Affects Children's Touchscreen Interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16), 1921–1933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858200

Digital Library

[78]

Julia Woodward, Jahelle Cato, Jesse Smith, Isaac Wang, Brett Benda, Lisa Anthony, and Jaime Ruiz. 2020. Examining Fitts’ and FFitts’ Law Models for Children's Pointing Tasks on Touchscreens. In ACM International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’20), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3399844

Digital Library

[79]

Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-hayon, Jason C. Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using Co-Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174149

Digital Library

[80]

Julia Woodward, Alex Shaw, Aishat Aloba, Ayushi Jain, Jaime Ruiz, and Lisa Anthony. 2017. Tablets, Tabletops, and Smartphones: Cross-Platform Comparisons of Children's Touchscreen Interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’17), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136762

Digital Library

[81]

Jason C. Yip, Kiley Sobel, Xin Gao, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Alexis Lim, Laura Meng, Romaine Flor Ofana, Justin Park, and Alexis Hiniker. 2019. Laughing is Scary, but Farting is Cute a Conceptual Model of Children's Perspectives of Creepy Technologies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19): 15pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300303

Digital Library

[82]

Jason C. Yip, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Sijin Chen, Kari Nasu, and Laura R. Pina. 2017. Examining Adult-Child Interactions in Intergenerational Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’2017), 5742–5754. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025787

Digital Library

[83]

Zhiwei Zhu, Vlad Branzoi, Michael Wolverton, Glen Murray, Nicholas Vitovitch, Louise Yarnall, Girish Acharya, Supun Samarasekera, and Rakesh Kumar. 2014. AR-Mentor: Augmented Reality Based Mentoring System. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR ’14), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2014.6948404

[84]

Augmented Reality Is A Game Changer For Oil & Gas. OilPrice.com. Retrieved from https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/

[85]

2017. Mario KartTM 8 Deluxe . Nintendo. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://mariokart8.nintendo.com/

[86]

2018. Woobo - A Smart Toy for Kids. Woobo. Retrieved August 25, 2021 from https://www.woobo.io/

[87]

2019. Mixed Reality Start Gesture. Microsoft Docs. Retrieved August 10, 2021 from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/design/system-gesture

[88]

2019. HoloLens Environment Considerations . Microsoft Docs. Retrieved August 11, 2021 from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hololens-environment-considerations

[89]

2020. HoloLens 2 Hardware. Microsoft Docs. Retrieved August 11, 2021 from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hololens2-hardware

[90]

2021. Microsoft HoloLens 2. Microsoft. Retrieved August 3, 2021 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens

[91]

2021. Video Conferencing, Cloud Phone, Webinars, Chat, Virtual Events . Zoom. Retrieved August 9, 2021 from https://zoom.us/

[92]

2021. Pokémon GO. The Pokémon Company. Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://pokemongolive.com/en/

[93]

2021. Online Whiteboard . Miro. Retrieved July 21, 2021 from https://miro.com/online-whiteboard/

[94]

2021. Fortnite . Epic Games. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://www.epicgames.com/fortnite/en-US/home

Cited By

Ansari YAlbarrak MAlokley S(2024)Empirical examination of financial literacy among youths in the developing economyRisk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions10.22495/rgcv14i4p1214:4(123-135)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv14i4p12
Goagoses NWinschiers-Theophilus HMendes JAuala SSutinen E(2024)Primary School Students Designing for Future Relationship Building in Extended Realities: Encounters with Live Human HologramsProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669864(13-18)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661455.3669864
Barquero ACalvo RDelgado DWang IAnthony LRuiz J(2024)Understanding User Needs for Task Guidance Systems Through the Lens of CookingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661611(2006-2018)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661611
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

“It Would Be Cool to Get Stampeded by Dinosaurs”: Analyzing Children's Conceptual Model of AR Headsets Through Co-Design
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI theory, concepts and models

Recommendations

Children with ADHD and their Care Ecosystem: Designing Beyond Symptoms
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Designing for children with ADHD has been of increasing interest to the HCI community. However, current approaches do not adequately involve all relevant stakeholders, and primarily focus on addressing symptoms, following a medical model of disability ...
Co-design of Augmented Reality Storybooks for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Universal Access and Inclusive Design
Abstract
Spectrum of autism is one of the most serious disorders that negatively affect the normal development of the brain. Children with autism usually face different levels of difficulties in communication and practicing essential life skills such as ...
YoungDeafDesign: Participatory design with young Deaf children
Abstract
It is common in HCI research to involve children in the design of their own technology. However, no design methods exist to design with young Deaf children. To address this gap, I have created YoungDeafDesign, a design method for designing with ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

10459 pages

ISBN:9781450391573

DOI:10.1145/3491102

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Julie Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK
,
Koji Yatani
University of Tokyo, Japan

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
1,103
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)381
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ansari YAlbarrak MAlokley S(2024)Empirical examination of financial literacy among youths in the developing economyRisk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions10.22495/rgcv14i4p1214:4(123-135)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv14i4p12
Goagoses NWinschiers-Theophilus HMendes JAuala SSutinen E(2024)Primary School Students Designing for Future Relationship Building in Extended Realities: Encounters with Live Human HologramsProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669864(13-18)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661455.3669864
Barquero ACalvo RDelgado DWang IAnthony LRuiz J(2024)Understanding User Needs for Task Guidance Systems Through the Lens of CookingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661611(2006-2018)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661611
Khurana AGlueck MChilana P(2024)Do I Just Tap My Headset?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314517:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631451
Sun KKanchi REllo FCo LWu MGelman SRadesky JSchaub FYip J(2024)"Why is Everything in the Cloud?": Co-Designing Visual Cues Representing Data Processes with ChildrenProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655819(517-532)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655819
Quander KMilky TAponte NCaceres Carrascal NWoodward J(2024)“Are you smart?”: Children's Understanding of “Smart” TechnologiesProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655787(625-638)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655787
Atabey AWang GJohnston SLin GWilson CUrquhart LZhao J(2024)The Second Workshop on Child-Centered AI Design (CCAI)Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636305(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3636305
Ye HLeng JXu PSingh KFu H(2024)ProInterAR: A Visual Programming Platform for Creating Immersive AR InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642527(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642527
Wang GZhao JKollnig KZier ADuron BZhang ZVan Kleek MShadbolt N(2024)KOALA Hero Toolkit: A New Approach to Inform Families of Mobile Datafication RisksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642283(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642283
Figueiredo VCameron C(2024)EXPLORA: A teacher-apprentice methodology for eliciting natural child-computer interactionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642070(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642070
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents