skip to main content
10.1145/3450613.3459656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Adaptive Visualisations Using Spatiotemporal and Heuristic Models to Support Piano Learning

Published: 21 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Learning the piano is hard and many approaches including piano-roll visualisations have been explored in order to support novices and seasoned learners in this process. However, existing piano roll prototypes have not considered the spatiotemporal component (user’s ability to press on a moving target) when generating these visualisations and user modelling. In this PhD, we are going to look into two different approaches: (i) exploring whether existing techniques in single-target spatiotemporal modelling can be adapted to a multi-target scenario such as when learners use several fingers to press multiple moving targets when playing the piano, and (ii) exploring heuristics defined by experts marking various difficult parts of songs, and deciding on specific interventions needed for these marked parts. Using models and input from the experts we will design and build an adaptive piano roll training system. We will evaluate and compare these models in various user studies involving users trying to play piano pieces and develop their improvisation skills. We intend to uncover whether these adaptive visualisations will be helpful in the overall training of piano learners. Additionally, these models and adaptive visualisations will allow us to discover affordances that can potentially improve piano learning in general.

References

[1]
Rahul Arora, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Danny M Kaufman, Wilmot Li, and Karan Singh. 2019. MagicalHands: Mid-Air Hand Gestures for Animating in VR. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 463–477.
[2]
István Barakonyi and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2005. Augmented reality agents in the development pipeline of computer entertainment. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 345–356.
[3]
Jonathan Chow, Haoyang Feng, Robert Amor, and Burkhard C Wünsche. 2013. Music education using augmented reality with a head mounted display. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian User Interface Conference-Volume 139. 73–79.
[4]
Peter Cope and Hugh Smith. 1997. Cultural context in musical instrument learning. British Journal of Music Education 14, 3 (1997), 283–289.
[5]
Andrea Creech. 2010. Learning a musical instrument: The case for parental support. Music Education Research 12, 1 (2010), 13–32.
[6]
Ryan Daniel. 2006. Exploring music instrument teaching and learning environments: Video analysis as a means of elucidating process and learning outcomes. Music Education Research 8, 2 (2006), 191–215.
[7]
Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of experimental psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381.
[8]
Dominique Fober, Stéphane Letz, and Yann Orlarey. 2007. Vemus-feedback and groupware technologies for music instrument learning.
[9]
Feng Huang, Yu Zhou, Yao Yu, Ziqiang Wang, and Sidan Du. 2011. Piano ar: A markerless augmented reality based piano teaching system. In 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, Vol. 2. IEEE, 47–52.
[10]
Raoul Huys, Hester Knol, Rita Sleimen-Malkoun, Jean-Jacques Temprado, and Viktor K Jirsa. 2015. Does changing Fitts’ index of difficulty evoke transitions in movement dynamics?EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics 3, 1 (2015), 8.
[11]
Mohammed K Khalil, Fred Paas, Tristan E Johnson, and Andrew F Payer. 2005. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists 286, 1(2005), 15–20.
[12]
Sunjun Kim, Byungjoo Lee, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2018. Impact activation improves rapid button pressing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.
[13]
Melina Klepsch, Florian Schmitz, and Tina Seufert. 2017. Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 1997.
[14]
Sébastien Lallé and Cristina Conati. 2019. The role of user differences in customization: a case study in personalization for infovis-based content. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 329–339.
[15]
Edward W Large and Caroline Palmer. 2002. Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive science 26, 1 (2002), 1–37.
[16]
Byungjoo Lee. 2016. Temporal Pointing. http://www.leebyungjoo.com/Temporal-Pointing-1
[17]
Byungjoo Lee, Qiao Deng, Eve Hoggan, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2017. Boxer: a multimodal collision technique for virtual objects. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 252–260.
[18]
Byungjoo Lee, Sunjun Kim, Antti Oulasvirta, Jong-In Lee, and Eunji Park. 2018. Moving target selection: A cue integration model. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[19]
Byungjoo Lee and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. Modelling error rates in temporal pointing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1857–1868.
[20]
Injung Lee, Sunjun Kim, and Byungjoo Lee. 2019. Geometrically compensating effect of end-to-end latency in moving-target selection games. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[21]
Yi-Chi Liao, Sunjun Kim, Byungjoo Lee, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2020. Button Simulation and Design via FDVV Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04352(2020).
[22]
Edward A Lippman. 1984. Progressive temporality in music. Journal of Musicology 3, 2 (1984), 121–141.
[23]
I Scott MacKenzie and William Buxton. 1992. Extending Fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 219–226.
[24]
Eunji Park and Byungjoo Lee. 2020. An Intermittent Click Planning Model. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[25]
Jeff Pressing. 1998. Error correction processes in temporal pattern production. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42, 1 (1998), 63–101.
[26]
Remy MJP Rikers, Pascal WM Van Gerven, and Henk G Schmidt. 2004. Cognitive load theory as a tool for expertise development. Instructional Science 32, 1-2 (2004), 173–182.
[27]
Katja Rogers, Amrei Röhlig, Matthias Weing, Jan Gugenheimer, Bastian Könings, Melina Klepsch, Florian Schaub, Enrico Rukzio, Tina Seufert, and Michael Weber. 2014. Piano: Faster piano learning with interactive projection. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 149–158.
[28]
Marc Ericson C Santos, Angie Chen, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Jun Miyazaki, and Hirokazu Kato. 2013. Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies 7, 1 (2013), 38–56.
[29]
Dirk Vorberg and Hans-Henning Schulze. 2002. Linear phase-correction in synchronization: Predictions, parameter estimation, and simulations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 46, 1 (2002), 56–87.
[30]
Matthias Weing, Amrei Röhlig, Katja Rogers, Jan Gugenheimer, Florian Schaub, Bastian Könings, Enrico Rukzio, and Michael Weber. 2013. PIANO: enhancing instrument learning via interactive projected augmentation. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication. 75–78.
[31]
Alan M Wing and AB Kristofferson. 1973. The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 13, 3 (1973), 455–460.
[32]
Alan M Wing and Alfred B Kristofferson. 1973. Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 1 (1973), 5–12.
[33]
Beste F Yuksel, Kurt B Oleson, Lane Harrison, Evan M Peck, Daniel Afergan, Remco Chang, and Robert JK Jacob. 2016. Learn piano with BACh: An adaptive learning interface that adjusts task difficulty based on brain state. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 5372–5384.
[34]
Feng Zheng, Ryan Schubert, and Greg Weich. 2013. A general approach for closed-loop registration in AR. In 2013 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 47–50.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '21: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
June 2021
325 pages
ISBN:9781450383660
DOI:10.1145/3450613
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. extended reality
  2. heuristics
  3. piano learning
  4. piano roll
  5. spatiotemporal moving target selection
  6. visualisation

Qualifiers

  • Abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UMAP '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media