Review of the Multi-perspective Evaluation Methods of Information Systems Equipment Facing the System Contribution Rate
Authors: 
Jun Wang, Ruihua Wang, Jian Hou, Yang Zhou, Qiang YeAuthors Info & Claims
Jun Wang, Ruihua Wang, Jian Hou, Yang Zhou, Qiang YeAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 147, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
To allusion to the problem that contribution rate evaluation supporting demonstration of a new information system equipment has a wide range of disciplines, many uncertain factors, complex correlation relationship and great difficulty in research, this paper analyzes the concept connotation and evaluation significance of information system contribution rate evaluation, summarizes the commonly used evaluation perspectives of information system equipment system contribution rate, such as system function adaptability, architecture optimization, combat capability improvement, system technology progress, etc., and puts forward the evaluation methods and models of system contribution rate are from three perspectives of architecture, combat capability and operational effectiveness. This paper analyzes and summarizes the common problems existing in the evaluation method of system contribution rate, and clarifies the future research direction of the evaluation method of system contribution rate, which provides reference for the equipment evaluation work.
References
[1]
Yiyong Li, Zhi Li, Qingbo Guan, et al. (2015). Discussion and demonstration on contribution evaluation of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 26(4), 5--10. issn. 2095--3828. 2015.04.002.
[2]
Jichao Li, Kewei Yang, Xiaoke Zhang, et al. (2016). Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems[J]. Complex System and Complexity Science, 13(003), 1--7.
[3]
Jichao Li, Yuejin Tan, Kewei Yang, et al. (2016). Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the operation loop[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 48(3), 659--674.
[4]
Huiwen Lv, Wei Zhang, Yaoping Lv, et al. (2017). Establishment of multi-perspective assessment index system of weaponry system contribution rate[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 28(3), 62--66.
[5]
Wenying Chen, Bingzhi Zhang, Lichen Shi, et al. (2018). Research on evaluation of contribution rate of a new intelligent armored combat system to army weapon system-of-systems[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 39(9), 1841--1849.
[6]
Xiaoming Luo, Yanlei Zhu and Rong He (2017). Research on Evaluation Method of Contribution to System War fighting for Weapons and Equipment System Based on Complex Network[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 42(2), 83--87.
[7]
Haigang Yan, Zhenyi Lu and Liang Wang (2019). Application of system contribution rate assessment in equipment life cycle[J]. 33(2), 28--32. /j. issn.1672-1497.2019. 02.005.
[8]
Xiaojing Yin, Xiaofeng Hu, Ming Rong, et al. (2019). Review of evaluation methods of contribution rate to system of systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 31(006), 1027--1038.
[9]
Shu He, Kewei Yang and Jie Liang (2017). Research on contribution of single equipment to weapon system-of-systems based on network invulnerability[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 42(8), 87--96.
[10]
Xiaobo Li, Mu Lin, Zhe Su, et al. (2018). Synthesized capability-effectiveness evaluation method of contribution ratio to system-of-systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 30(12), 4520--4528.
[11]
Peng Liu, Danling Zhao, Yuejin Tian, et al. (2019). Multi-task-oriented contribution evaluation method of weapon equipment system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 41(8), 1764--1770.
[12]
Nan Wang, Juan Yang and Rong He (2016). Evaluation method of equipment's contribution to system warfighting based on rough set[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 38(1), 104--107.
[13]
Jialin Liang and Wei Xiong (2018). Overview of evaluation method of contribution of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 39(4), 67--71.
[14]
Jun Zhang, Jianjun Wang, Mu Zhang, et al. (2018). Study on evaluation method of "Distributed Killing" combat system and contribution rate of weapons and equipment[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 38(6), 5--11. 3969/j. issn. 1672-9730. 2018. 06. 002.
[15]
Xiaochao Qian, Wei Tang, Wei Chen, et al. (2018). Evaluation of contribution of army combined arms in all-domains weapon system-of-systems based on critical capability[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 30(12), 4786--4793.
[16]
Xiaowei Chen, Junqi Zhang and Yongzhi Yang (2018). Analysis on measurement methods of new equipment system-of-systems contribution[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 39(4), 19--22.
[17]
Bozi Zhang, Guozhong Zhang and Huayao Chang (2018). Problem of contribution evaluation of weapon system of systems[J]. Computer Simulation, (2), 397--401.
[18]
Ziqing Ye and Yepin Qu (2015). Analysis of contribution degree based on rule-based reasoning for naval aviation operation equipment system[J]. Command Control & Simulation, (5), 29--33.
[19]
Xianchao Zhang and Yahui Ma (2019). Capability model of combat system of systems and measurement method of armament contribution to combat system of system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 41(4), 843--849.
Index Terms
- Review of the Multi-perspective Evaluation Methods of Information Systems Equipment Facing the System Contribution Rate
Recommendations
Research on Evaluation of Capability Contribution Rate of Tracking, Telemetry, and Control Equipment System Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)The contribution rate assessment of equipment system of systems capability is a basic problem in the development planning of equipment system of systems which provides reliable basis for grasping the development direction of Tracking, Telemetry, and ...
Research on complex equipment supplier evaluation system and methods
BDEIM '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information ManagementIn view of the problems existing in the existing complex equipment supplier evaluation systems and methods, such as incomplete consideration of access indicators and insufficient objectivity of evaluation methods, a complex equipment supplier evaluation ...
A Review of Human-Computer Interface Evaluation Research Based on Evaluation Process Elements
Human-Computer InteractionAbstractAs an important medium for human-computer information exchange, the human-computer interface (HCI) plays an important role in the human-computer-environment system that cannot be ignored. A friendly design of HCI not only enables operators to ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2020
1038 pages
ISBN:9781450377720
DOI:10.1145/3424978
- Conference Chair:
- Ali Emrouznejad,
- Program Chair:
- Jui-Sheng Rayson Chou
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 October 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CSAE 2020
CSAE 2020: The 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
October 20 - 22, 2020
Sanya, China
Acceptance Rates
CSAE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 179 of 387 submissions, 46%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 35Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)5
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in