skip to main content
10.1145/3411564.3411651acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Investigation on the Use of Interaction Design Patterns in Brazilian Government Mobile Information Systems

Published: 03 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In the field of e-government, the use of mobile information systems is gaining space, driven by the ubiquity of the Internet and mobile devices. Interaction design patterns are recurring solutions to common design problems that become increasingly relevant through the contributions made by developers and consequently, users. They are based on proven and frequently used solutions. Despite the existence of a large number of interaction design patterns for mobile systems, there is little knowledge regarding the extent to which governmental apps have employed these solutions, commonly found in commercial apps, to enhance the apps for citizens. This paper presents an evaluation of a sample of 27 Brazilian federal government mobile information systems against a set of 76 interactive design patterns. Our goal was to identify implemented patterns and frequent practices across apps. The results showed that the government’s mobile information systems had a low level of employment of the interaction design patterns analyzed. Applications often implemented strategies for designing very elementary user content, or others linked to input, navigation, or actions. Users who can recognize patterns commonly used in other interfaces may end up having their interaction impaired by the lack of recognition of design solutions commonly present in other apps. Following elements from the Pattern Theory by Christopher Alexander, not observing patterns may be an indicator of the lack of concern with making governmental information systems a more “nurturing” environment to citizens, which may cause lower acceptance of such systems. The analysis of interaction design patterns made in this study can help government agencies to focus on interface components that rely on standard, user-recognizable patterns. These practices can provide users with more familiar ways of using governmental services in mobile systems.

References

[1]
Christopher Alexander. 1979. The timeless way of building. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, New York.
[2]
Christopher Alexander. 1999. The origins of pattern theory: The future of the theory, and the generation of a living world. IEEE software 16, 5 (1999), 71–82.
[3]
Brad Appleton. 1997. Patterns and software: Essential concepts and terminology.
[4]
Barbara P Caetano, Guilherme W Oliveira, Melise Paula, and Jano M Souza. 2016. Digital democracy: an analysis of resources and acceptance. In Proceedings of the XII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 18:128–18:135.
[5]
Lemuria Carter and France Bélanger. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal 15, 1 (2005), 5–25.
[6]
Vitor Casadei, Luciana Zaina, Eduardo Pinheiro, and Toni Granollers. 2016. Accessibility evaluation of design patterns on moodle mobile. In Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE). Uberlândia, Brazil, 688–697.
[7]
Jyoti Choudrie and Adel Alfalah. 2016. Older Adults in Households and e-Government services in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A digital Divide Study of Adoption, Use and Diffusion. In Pacific Asia Conference of Information Systems (PACIS) Proceedings. Association of Information Systems, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Hertfordshire, UK. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/338''
[8]
Jyoti Choudrie, Susan Grey, and Nicholas Tsitsianis. 2010. Evaluating the digital divide: the Silver Surfer’s perspective. Electronic Government, an International Journal 7, 2 (2010), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2010.030925
[9]
Murray Silverstein Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Cess Center for Environmental). Center for Environmental Structure, Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, New York.
[10]
Mehdi Fasanghari and Hossein Samimi. 2009. A novel framework for m-government implementation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Computer and Communication (ICFCC). IEEE, Lumpur, Malaysia, 627–631.
[11]
Nicholas Faulkner, Bradley Jorgensen, and Georgina Koufariotis. 2019. Can behavioural interventions increase citizens’ use of e-government? Evidence from a quasi-experimental trial. Government Information Quarterly 36, 1 (2019), 61 – 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.009
[12]
Daniela Fogli, Loredana Parasiliti Provenza, and Cristian Bernareggi. 2014. A universal design resource for rich Internet applications based on design patterns. Universal access in the information society 13, 2 (2014), 205–226.
[13]
Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
[14]
Panagiotis Germanakos, George Samaras, and Eleni Christodoulou. 2005. Multi-channel delivery of services–The road from egovernment to mgovernment: Further technological challenges and implications. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Mobile Government (Euro mGov 2005). Brighton, UK, 210–220.
[15]
Steven Hoober and Eric Berkman. 2011. Designing mobile interfaces: Patterns for interaction design. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, United States.
[16]
Shin-Yuan Hung, Chia-Ming Chang, and Shao-Rong Kuo. 2013. User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly 30, 1 (2013), 33 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.008
[17]
Ahmed Imran, Val Quimno, and Mehdi Hussain. 2016. Current Landscape and Potential of Mobile Computing Research in the Least Developed Countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 74, 1(2016), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00539.x
[18]
Huhn Kim. 2010. Effective organization of design guidelines reflecting designer’s design strategies. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40, 6(2010), 669–688.
[19]
Paula Kotzé, Karen Renaud, Kostas Koukouletsos, Babak Khazaei, and Andy Dearden. 2006. Patterns, anti-patterns and guidelines–effective aids to teaching HCI principles. In Inventivity: Teaching theory, design and innovation in HCI. HCI Educators Workshop, University of Limerick, Proceedings of HCIEd2006-1, Limerick, Ireland, 115–120.
[20]
Ibrahim Kushchu and M. Halid Kuscu. 2003. From E-government to M-government: Facing the Inevitable. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on E-Government. Dublin, Ireland, 253–260.
[21]
T.Y. Lau, Mira Aboulhoson, Carolyn Lin, and David J. Atkin. 2008. Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy 32, 2 (2008), 88 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.07.007
[22]
Doug Lea. 1994. Christopher Alexander: An introduction for object-oriented designers. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 19, 1 (1994), 39–46.
[23]
Liang Ma and Yueping Zheng. 2018. Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review 20, 10 (2018), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1412117
[24]
Tamás Molnár, Andrea Kő, and Bálint Mátyus. 2017. Exploring Usability and Acceptance Factors of m-Government Systems for Elderly. In Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 175–188.
[25]
Gustavo H. S. M. Moraes. 2016. The Elderly And The Electronic Government In Brazil. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation 23 (2016), 295–302.
[26]
Bjoern Niehaves and Ralf Plattfaut. 2010. What Is the Issue with Internet Acceptance among Elderly Citizens? Theory Development and Policy Recommendations for Inclusive E-Government. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 275–288.
[27]
Erik G. Nilsson. 2009. Design patterns for user interface for mobile applications. Advances in Engineering Software 40, 12 (2009), 1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.017
[28]
Wolfgang Palka, Marlen Jurisch, Veronika Schreiber, Petra Wolf, and Helmut Krcmar. 2013. Mobile Government, Quo Vadis?-Opportunities and Risks of Mobile E-Government Services. In International Conference on Mobile Business. 19.
[29]
Lumpapun Punchoojit and Nuttanont Hongwarittorrn. 2017. Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2017 (11 2017), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6787504
[30]
Jorge Ribeiro and Miguel Carvalhais. 2012. Web design patterns for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs. The Hillside Group, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 13.
[31]
Dirk Riehle and Heinz Züllighoven. 1996. Understanding and using patterns in software development. Tapos 2, 1 (1996), 3–13.
[32]
Gwendolyn Rodrigues, Jawahitha Sarabdeen, and Sreejith Balasubramanian. 2016. Factors that Influence Consumer Adoption of E-government Services in the UAE: A UTAUT Model Perspective. Journal of Internet Commerce 15, 1 (2016), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2015.1121460
[33]
Viviana Yarel Rosales-Morales, Laura Nely Sánchez-Morales, Giner Alor-Hernández, José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes, Nicandro Cruz-Ramírez, and Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz. 2019. Identification of UIDPs for Developing Medical Apps. In Trends and Applications in Software Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 175–185.
[34]
Sandra Sanchez-Gordon, Mary Sánchez-Gordón, Murat Yilmaz, and Rory V O’Connor. 2019. Integration of accessibility design patterns with the software implementation process of ISO/IEC 29110. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 31, 1 (2019), e1987.
[35]
Leandro Coelho Serra, Lucas Pedroso Carvalho, Lucas Pereira Ferreira, Jorge Belimar Silva Vaz, and André Pimenta Freire. 2015. Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 348–357.
[36]
Anu Siren and Sine Grønborg Knudsen. 2017. Older adults and emerging digital service delivery: A mixed methods study on information and communications technology use, skills, and attitudes. Journal of aging & social policy 29, 1 (2017), 35–50.
[37]
Global Stats StatCounter. 2019. Mobile Operating System Market Share Worldwide. Available online at https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide/2019, last accessed on 02th October 2019.
[38]
Aleksandra Tešanovic. 2005. What is a pattern?Dr.ing. course DT8100 (prev. 78901/45942/DIF8901) Object-oriented Systems.
[39]
Jenifer Tidwell. 1999. A pattern language for human-computer interface design. Available online at https://www.mit.edu/ jtidwell/common_ground.html, last accessed on 02th October 2019.
[40]
Silvana Trimi and Hong Sheng. 2008. Emerging trends in M-government. Commun. ACM 51, 5 (2008), 53–58.
[41]
Jonas Valente. 2019. Governo federal cria “loja” para disponibilizar aplicativos. Available online at http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/geral/noticia/2019-09/governo-federal-cria-loja-para-disponibilizar-aplicativosl, last accessed on 05th October 2019.
[42]
Martijn van Welie, Gerrit C. van der Veer, and Anton Eliëns. 2001. Patterns as Tools for User Interface Design. In Tools for Working with Guidelines. Springer London, London, 313–324.
[43]
Eric W Welch, Charles C Hinnant, and M Jae Moon. 2004. Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of public administration research and theory 15, 3 (2004), 371–391.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SBSI '20: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
November 2020
371 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Digital Government
  2. Interaction Design Patterns
  3. Mobile Information Systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SBSI'20
SBSI'20: XVI Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
November 3 - 6, 2020
São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 181 of 557 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media