Cited By
View all- Ghosh AVerma A(2021)Thematic analysis of reflective peer feedback in programming-heavy engineering courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637374(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
Classroom Presentation of Code: An Alternative Peer Review Process
Article No.: 38, Pages 1 - 2
Abstract
The present poster documents an attempt by the investigators to try out classroom presentations as a viable replacement for peer reviews in programming-heavy coursework. The results from the project provide helpful pointers for cues/comments that would enable reviewing students to think critically about code being presented. The results also indicate that the method used to form groups to solve assignments can have at least as strong an effect as code presentation. In addition, overall grade distribution in a course, as used in this project, may not be a reliable indicator for student learning when data is spread out over multiple semesters. As a pilot project, the information presented here is primarily helpful in determining the conditions required to test the utility of code presentation in future projects.
References
[1]
Hämäläinen, H. et al. 2009. Use of peer-review system for enhancing learning of programming. Proceedings - 2009 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2009. (2009), 658--660.
[2]
Harding, L.M. 2018. Students of a Feather "Flocked" Together: A Group Assignment Method for Reducing Free-Riding and Improving Group and Individual Learning Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education. 40, 2 (2018), 117--127.
[3]
Li, X. 2006. Using Peer Review to Assess Coding Standards - A Case Study. Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference. (2006), 9--14.
[4]
Rubin, M.J. 2013. The effectiveness of live-coding to teach introductory programming. SIGCSE 2013 - Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (2013), 651--656.
[5]
Schmolitzky, A. 2007. Patterns for teaching software in classroom. EuroPLoP 2007 - 12th European Conferenceon Pattern Languages of Programs. (2007), 37--52.
[6]
Trytten, D.A. 2005. A design for team peer code review. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37, 1 (2005), 455.
[7]
Wang, Y. et al. 2012. Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report. Computers and Education. 59, 2 (2012), 412--422.
[8]
Yan-qing, W. et al. 2008. Process improvement of peer code review and behavior analysis of its participants. SIGCSE'08 - Proceedings of the 39th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (2008), 107--111.
Index Terms
- Classroom Presentation of Code: An Alternative Peer Review Process
Recommendations
Improving Programming Skills Through Classroom Presentation of Assignments
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationStudents in non-CS STEM majors often have specific difficulties with programming content in their coursework. Instructor feedback is usually limited to the results obtained and major algorithmic errors, due to the nature of coding assignments. The ...
Using peer review in teaching computing
For generations, the academic community has relied on peer review as a way of encouraging scholarship and enhancing the knowledge base. Peer review has been widely used in the classroom since at least the 1970s, with hundreds of papers on its use in ...
Learning outside of the classroom: the Northeastern University research co-op fellowship program
WCAE '00: Proceedings of the 2000 workshop on Computer architecture educationNortheastern University has developed an educational philosophy that recognizes that the total educational experience extends well beyond the four walls of the classroom. Cooperative education is a model that educates students both within the academic ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2019
247 pages
Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
In-Cooperation
- University of Helsinki
- Univ. Eastern Finland: University of Eastern Finland
- The University of Adelaide, Australia
- SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 November 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
Koli Calling '19
Koli Calling '19: 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
November 21 - 24, 2019
Koli, Finland
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 74Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)11
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Ghosh AVerma A(2021)Thematic analysis of reflective peer feedback in programming-heavy engineering courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637374(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in