skip to main content
10.1145/3341981.3344223acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Comparative Analysis of Human and Automatic Query Variants

Published: 26 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

We present an in-depth comparative analysis of the effectiveness distributions of sets of human-created and automatically-created query variations used to represent the same information need. The automatic variations are generated using Bing's click graph. Experiments performed with TREC datasets show that using automatic variations for retrieval can result in similar effectiveness to that of using human variations, although the two types of variations can be appreciably different in several important respects --- e.g., their similarities and corresponding retrieved lists.

References

[1]
L. Azzopardi, M. de Rijke, and K. Balog. 2007. Building simulated queries for knownitem topics: an analysis using six european languages. In Proc. SIGIR. 455--462.
[2]
P. Bailey, A. Moffat, F. Scholer, and P. Thomas. 2016. UQV100: A Test Collection with Query Variability. In Proc. SIGIR. 725--728.
[3]
P. Bailey, A. Moffat, F. Scholer, and P. Thomas. 2017. Retrieval Consistency in the Presence of Query Variations. In Proc. SIGIR. 395--404.
[4]
R. Benham and J. S. Culpepper. 2017. Risk-Reward Trade-o's in Rank Fusion. In Proc. ADCS. 1--8.
[5]
R. Benham, J. S. Culpepper, L. Gallagher, X. Lu, and J. Mackenzie. 2018. Towards effcient and effective query variant generation. In Proc. DESIRES. 62--67.
[6]
N. Craswell and M. Szummer. 2007. Random walks on the click graph. In Proc. SIGIR. 239--246.
[7]
R. Cummins, M. Lalmas, and C. O'Riordan. 2011. The limits of retrieval effectiveness. In Proc. ECIR. 277--282.
[8]
D. Sheldon, M. Shokouhi, M. Szummer, and N. Craswell. 2011. LambdaMerge: Merging the Results of Query Reformulations. In Proc. WSDM. 795--804.
[9]
F. Song andW. B. Croft. 1999. A general language model for information retrieval (poster abstract). In Proc. of SIGIR. 279--280.
[10]
E.Walker and A. S. Nowacki. 2011. Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. J. General Internal Medicine 26, 2 (2011), 192--196.
[11]
W. Webber, A. Moffat, and J. Zobel. 2010. A Similarity Measure for Indeffnite Rankings. ACM Trans. Information Systems 28, 4 (Nov. 2010), 20.1--20.38.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICTIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval
September 2019
273 pages
ISBN:9781450368810
DOI:10.1145/3341981
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. user query formulation
  2. web search

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

ICTIR '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICTIR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 41 submissions, 49%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 235 of 527 submissions, 45%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media