skip to main content
10.1145/3325480.3325485acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Sharing the Studio: How Creative Livestreaming can Inspire, Educate, and Engage

Published: 13 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Many artists livestream their creative process, allowing viewers to learn and be inspired from the decisions -- and mistakes -- they make along the way. This paper presents the first broad look at the range of creative activities people stream. Through content analysis of livestream archives, interviews with 8 streamers, and online surveys with 165 viewers, we study current practices and challenges in creative livestream communities and compare them with prior observations of livestreaming in other domains. We observed four common types of creative livestreams: teaching, making, socializing, and performing. We identify three open questions for the research community around how to better support the goals of creative streamers and viewers: how to support richer audience interactions at scale, how to support all parts of the creative process, and how to support watching livestream archives.

References

[1]
Gifford Cheung and Jeff Huang. 2011. Starcraft from the stands: understanding the game spectator. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 763.
[2]
Travis Faas, Lynn Dombrowski, Alyson Young, and Andrew D. Miller. 2018. Watch Me Code: Programming Mentorship Communities on Twitch.tv . Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (nov 2018), 1--18.
[3]
Seth Glickman, Nathan McKenzie, Joseph Seering, Rachel Moeller, and Jessica Hammer. 2018. Design Challenges for Livestreamed Audience Participation Games. In The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 187--199.
[4]
Lassi Haaranen and Lassi. 2017. Programming as a Performance: Live-streaming and Its Implications for Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - ITiCSE '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 353--358.
[5]
Oliver L. Haimson and John C. Tang. 2017. What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 48--60.
[6]
William A. Hamilton, Oliver Garretson, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1315--1324.
[7]
Scarlett R. Herring, Chia-Chen Chang, Jesse Krantzler, and Brian P. Bailey. 2009. Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 87.
[8]
Zorah Hilvert-Bruce, James T. Neill, Max Sjö blom, and Juho Hamari. 2018. Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch . Computers in Human Behavior 84 (jul 2018), 58--67.
[9]
Mu Hu, Mingli Zhang, and Yu Wang. 2017. Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework . Computers in Human Behavior 75 (oct 2017), 594--606.
[10]
Adele Lu Jia, Siqi Shen, Dick H. J. Epema, and Alexandru Iosup. 2016. When Game Becomes Life: The Creators and Spectators of Online Game Replays and Live Streaming . ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 12, 4 (aug 2016), 1--24.
[11]
Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 246--258.
[12]
Pascal Lessel, Alexander Vielhauer, and Antonio Krü ger. 2017. Expanding Video Game Live-Streams with Enhanced Communication Channels: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1571--1576.
[13]
Claudia Lo. 2018. When All You Have is a Banhammer: The Social and Communicative Work of Volunteer Moderators . Master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://cmsw.mit.edu/banhammer-social-communicative-work-volunteer-moderators/
[14]
Angé lica Ló pez, Maricela Correa-Chá vez, Barbara Rogoff, and Kris Gutié rrez. 2010. Attention to instruction directed to another by U.S. Mexican-heritage children of varying cultural backgrounds. Developmental Psychology 46, 3 (2010), 593--601.
[15]
Zhicong Lu, Michelle Annett, Mingming Fan, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. "I feel it is my responsibility to stream": Streaming and Engaging with Intangible Cultural Heritage through Livestreaming. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK (To appear). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[16]
Zhicong Lu, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel J. Wigdor. 2018a. StreamWiki: Enabling Viewers of Knowledge Sharing Live Streams to Collaboratively Generate Archival Documentation for Effective In-Stream and Post Hoc Learning . Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (nov 2018), 1--26.
[17]
Zhicong Lu, Haijun Xia, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018b. You Watch, You Give, and You Engage: A Study of Live Streaming Practices in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13.
[18]
Matthew K. Miller, John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, Gerard Wilkinson, and Kori Inkpen. 2017. Conversational Chat Circles: Being All Here Without Having to Hear It All. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2394--2404.
[19]
Bill Moorier. 2015. Introducing Twitch Creative. (2015). https://blog.twitch.tv/introducing-twitch-creative-fbfe23b4a114
[20]
Anthony J. Pellicone and June Ahn. 2017. The Game of Performing Play: Understanding Streaming as Cultural Production. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 4863--4874.
[21]
Tom Robertson. 2018. Introducing Tags and New Categories: New Ways to Discover Streamers on Twitch. (2018). https://blog.twitch.tv/introducing-tags-and-new-categories-33744ef7b04f
[22]
Donald A. Schoen. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action . Basic Books. 374 pages. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Reflective_Practitioner.html?id=ceJIWay4-jgC
[23]
Donald A. Schoen. 1985. The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials . RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust. 99 pages. https://www.abebooks.com/9780947877453/Design-Studio-Exploration-Traditions-Potentials-0947877452/plp
[24]
Joseph Seering, Robert Kraut, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 111--125.
[25]
Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms . New Media & Society (jan 2019), 146144481882131.
[26]
Max Sjö blom and Juho Hamari. 2017. Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users . Computers in Human Behavior 75 (oct 2017), 985--996.
[27]
Max Sjö blom, Maria Tö rhö nen, Juho Hamari, and Joseph Macey. 2017. Content structure is king: An empirical study on gratifications, game genres and content type on Twitch . Computers in Human Behavior 73 (aug 2017), 161--171.
[28]
John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2016. Meerkat and Periscope: I Stream, You Stream, Apps Stream for Live Streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 4770--4780.
[29]
Donghee Yvette Wohn, Guo Freeman, and Caitlin McLaughlin. 2018. Explaining Viewers' Emotional, Instrumental, and Financial Support Provision for Live Streamers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13.
[30]
Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, New York.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Effectiveness Analysis of a Method for Generating Work Reactions to Spoken Utterances for Facilitating Task Execution Using Haiku WritingInternational Symposium on Affective Science and Engineering10.5057/isase.2024-C000007ISASE2024(1-4)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Towards a Design Framework for Data-Driven Game Streaming: A Multi-Stakeholder ApproachProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36771078:CHI PLAY(1-28)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Exploring The Affordances of Game-Aware Streaming to Support Blind and Low Vision Viewers: A Design Probe StudyProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675665(1-13)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition
June 2019
745 pages
ISBN:9781450359177
DOI:10.1145/3325480
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. creativity
  2. livestreaming
  3. online video

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

C&C '19
Sponsor:
C&C '19: Creativity and Cognition
June 23 - 26, 2019
CA, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

C&C '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 101 submissions, 30%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)318
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media