skip to main content
10.1145/3210459.3210477acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Power and Politics of User Involvement in Software Development

Published: 28 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

[CONTEXT] Involving users in software development is a complex and multi-faceted concept. Empirical research that studies power and politics of user involvement in software development is scarce. [OBJECTIVE] In this paper, we present the results from a case study of a software development project, where organizational politics was explored in context of user involvement in software development. [METHOD] We collected data through 30 interviews with 20 participants, attending workshops, observing project meetings, and analysing projects documents. The qualitative data was rigorously and iteratively analyzed. [RESULTS] The results indicate that the politics was a significant factor used to exert power and influence in decision-making processes. Communication channels were exploited for political purposes. These contributed to the users' dissatisfaction with their involvement thus impacting on the project outcome. [CONCLUSION] Having multiple teams of stakeholders with different levels of power in decision-making, the politics is inevitable and inescapable. Without careful attention, the political aspect of user involvement in software development can contribute to unsuccessful project.

References

[1]
Bano, M. and D. Zowghi, A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Information and Software Technology, 2015. 58: p. 148--169.
[2]
Abelein, U. and B. Paech, Understanding the influence of user participation and involvement on system success---A systematic mapping study. Empirical Software Engineering, 2015. 20(1): p. 28--81.
[3]
Cavaye, A.L., User participation in system development revisited. Information & Management, 1995. 28(5): p. 311--323.
[4]
Ives, B. and M.H. Olson, User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management science, 1984. 30(5): p. 586--603.
[5]
Zowghi, D., F. da Rimini, and M. Bano. Problems and challenges of user involvement in software development: an empirical study. in Proceedings of the 19th EASE 2015. ACM.
[6]
Baronas, A.-M.K. and M.R. Louis, Restoring a sense of control during implementation: how user involvement leads to system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 1988: p. 111--124.
[7]
Wagner, E.L. and G. Piccoli, Moving beyond user participation to achieve successful IS design. Communications of the ACM, 2007. 50(12): p. 51--55.
[8]
Robey, D. and D. Farrow, User involvement in information system development: A conflict model and empirical test. Management science, 1982. 28(1): p. 73--85.
[9]
Iivari, N., 'Representing the User 'in software development---a cultural analysis of usability work in the product development context. Interacting with Computers, 2006. 18(4): p. 635--664.
[10]
Muller, M.J., J.H. Haslwanter, and T. Dayton, Participatory practices in the software lifecycle. Handbook of human-computer interaction, 1997. 2: p. 255--297.
[11]
Damodaran, L., User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users. Behaviour & information technology, 1996. 15(6): p. 363--377.
[12]
Mumford, E., Consensus systems design: An evaluation of this approach. Design and Implementation of computer based information systems, 1979.
[13]
Milne, A. and N. Maiden, Power and politics in requirements engineering: embracing the dark side? Requirements Engineering, 2012. 17(2): p. 83--98.
[14]
Maiden, N., Politics Are Inescapable. IEEE software, 2012. 29(5).
[15]
Dahl, R.A., The concept of power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 1957. 2(3): p. 201--215.
[16]
Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz, Two Faces of Power. Power: Critical Concepts, 1994. 2: p. 85.
[17]
French, J.R., B. Raven, and D. Cartwright, The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 1959. 7.
[18]
Grover, V., A.L. Lederer, and R. Sabherwal, Recognizing the politics of MIS. Information & Management, 1988. 14(3): p. 145--156.
[19]
Markus, M.L., Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 1983. 26(6): p. 430--444.
[20]
Johann, T. and W. Maalej. Democratic mass participation of users in Requirements Engineering? in Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2015 IEEE 23rd International. 2015. IEEE.
[21]
Valença, G. and C. Alves, A theory of power in emerging software ecosystems formed by small-to-medium enterprises. Journal of Systems and Software, 2017. 134: p. 76--104.
[22]
Hurni, T. and T. Huber, The interplay of power and trust in platform ecosystems of the enterprise application software industry. 2014.
[23]
Poo-Caamaño, G., Release management in free and open source software ecosystems. 2016.
[24]
Bano, M. and D. Zowghi. User involvement in software development and system success: a systematic literature review. in Proceedings of the 17th EASE 2013. ACM.
[25]
Bano, M., D. Zowghi, and F. da Rimini, User satisfaction and system success: an empirical exploration of user involvement in software development. Empirical Software Engineering, 2017. 22(5): p. 2339--2372.
[26]
Kujala, S., Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2008. 27(6): p. 457--473.
[27]
Bjerknes, G. and T. Bratteteig, User participation and democracy: A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scandinavian Journal of information systems, 1995. 7(1): p. 1.
[28]
Buchan, J., et al. Alignment of Stakeholder Expectations about User Involvement in Agile Software Development. in Proceedings of the 21st EASE 2017. ACM.
[29]
Walsham, G., Doing interpretive research. European journal of information systems, 2006. 15(3): p. 320--330.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EASE '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018
June 2018
223 pages
ISBN:9781450364034
DOI:10.1145/3210459
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • The University of Canterbury

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Politics
  2. Power
  3. Software Development
  4. User Involvement

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EASE'18

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media