skip to main content
10.1145/3152832.3152862acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and evaluation of a computer-actuated mouse

Published: 26 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Although interaction with computing systems has become remarkably diverse in recent years, the computer mouse remained the primary pointing device for daily computer use. Being solely an input device, the classical mouse decouples input from output. In this paper, we propose to extend the mouse to a device that can be actuated by the user and the computer. We developed a mouse that allows its position and button state to be actuated. In a technical evaluation, we test the spatial resolution of our system and how effectively feedback is communicated to the user. In a subjective assessment, we explore users' reactions to four use cases including games and office applications, highlighting the potential of the device. Through a quantitative assessment, we investigate whether perceiving the movement of the mouse helps to learn gestures. Finally, we discuss how a mouse providing feedback can be used to build novel interaction techniques.

References

[1]
Motoyuki Akamatsu and I. Scott MacKenzie. 1996. Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 4 (1996), 483--193.
[2]
Motoyuki Akamatsu, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Thierry Hasbroucq. 1995. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics 38, 4 (1995), 816--827.
[3]
Motoyuki Akamatsu and Sigeru Sato. 1994. A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 3 (1994), 443--453.
[4]
Kikuo Asai, Norio Takase, and Makoto Sato. 2015. Revisiting gradient-based haptic rendering for lateral force feedback in SPIDAR-mouse. In Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games (HAVE), 2015 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--6.
[5]
Gilles Bailly, Sidharth Sahdev, Sylvain Malacria, and Thomas Pietrzak. 2016. LivingDesktop: Augmenting Desktop Workstation with Actuated Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, 5298--5310.
[6]
Jack Tigh Dennerlein, David B Martin, and Christopher Hasser. 2000. Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steering-targeting tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 423--429.
[7]
David Feygin, Madeleine Keehner, and Frank Tendick. 2002. Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2002. HAPTICS 2002. Proceedings. 10th Symposium on. 40--47.
[8]
Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group. Springer, 63--76.
[9]
Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, Willi Mueller, Daniel Hoffmann, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Proprioceptive Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 939--948.
[10]
I. Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts' Law As a Research and Design Tool in Human-computer Interaction. Human-Compututer Interaction 7, 1 (March 1992), 91--139.
[11]
Brad A. Myers. 1998. A Brief History of Human-computer Interaction Technology. interactions 5, 2 (March 1998), 44--54.
[12]
Haruo Noma, Tsutomu Miyasato, and Fumio Kishino. 1996. A Palmtop Display for Dextrous Manipulation with Haptic Sensation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '96). ACM, 126--133.
[13]
Max Pfeiffer, Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, and Michael Rohs. 2014. Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-hand Interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '14). ACM, Article 48, 8 pages.
[14]
Anne Roudaut, Andreas Rau, Christoph Sterz, Max Plauth, Pedro Lopes, and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Gesture Output: Eyes-free Output Using a Force Feedback Touch Surface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, 2547--2556.
[15]
Steven F. Wiker, Gregg Vanderheiden, Seongil Lee, and Steven Arndt. 1991. Development of tactile mice for blind access to computers: importance of stimulation locus, object size, and vibrotactile display resolution. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 35. SAGE Publications, 708--712.
[16]
Gi-Hun Yang, Ki-Uk Kyung, Young-Ju Jeong, and Dong-Soo Kwon. 2005. Novel haptic mouse system for holistic haptic display and potential of vibrotactile stimulation. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 1980--1985.
[17]
Wai Yu and Stephen Brewster. 2002. Comparing two haptic interfaces for multimodal graph rendering. In Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2002. HAPTICS 2002. Proceedings. 10th Symposium on. IEEE, 3--9.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MUM '17: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
November 2017
567 pages
ISBN:9781450353786
DOI:10.1145/3152832
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 November 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. actuated device
  2. force feedback
  3. mouse
  4. pointing device

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MUM 2017

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media