skip to main content
10.1145/3132218.3132226acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a Semantic Outlier Detection Framework in Wireless Sensor Networks

Published: 11 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Outlier detection in the preprocessing phase of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) processes has been a widely researched topic for many years. However, identifying the potential outlier cause still remains an unsolved challenge even though it could be very helpful for determining what actions to take after detecting it. Furthermore, conventional outlier detection methods might still overlook outliers in certain complex contexts. In this article, Semantic Technologies are used to contribute overcoming these problems by proposing the SemOD (Semantic Outlier Detection) Framework. This framework guides the data-scientist towards the detection of certain types of outliers in WSNs (Wireless Sensor Network). Feasibility of the approach has been tested in outdoor temperature sensors and results show that the proposed approach is generic enough to apply it to different sensors, even improving the accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of outlier detection as well as spotting their potential cause.

References

[1]
Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41, 3 (2009), 15.
[2]
Asmaa Fawzy, Hoda MO Mokhtar, and Osman Hegazy. 2013. Outliers detection and classification in wireless sensor networks. Egyptian Informatics Journal 14, 2 (2013), 157--164.
[3]
Christian Fürber. 2015. Data quality management with semantic technologies. Springer.
[4]
Christian Fürber and Martin Hepp. 2010. Using semantic web resources for data quality management. In International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Springer, 211--225.
[5]
Christian Fürber and Martin Hepp. 2010. Using SPARQL and SPIN for data quality management on the semantic web. In International Conference on Business Information Systems. Springer, 35--46.
[6]
Lianli Gao, Michael Bruenig, and Jane Hunter. 2014. Semantic-based detection of segment outliers and unusual events for wireless sensor networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2188 (2014).
[7]
Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber, and Jian Pei. 2011. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
[8]
Victoria J. Hodge and Jim Austin. 2004. A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review 22, 2 (2004), 85--126.
[9]
Krzysztof Janowicz, Frank Van Harmelen, James A. Hendler, and Pascal Hitzler. 2014. Why the data train needs semantic rails. AI Magazine (2014).
[10]
Vijay Kotu and Bala Deshpande. 2014. Predictive Analytics and Data Mining: Concepts and Practice with RapidMiner. Morgan Kaufmann.
[11]
Jiongqian Liang and Srinivasan Parthasarathy. 2016. Robust Contextual Outlier Detection: Where Context Meets Sparsity. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2167--2172.
[12]
Siaw-Teng Liaw, Alireza Rahimi, Pradeep Ray, Jane Taggart, S. Dennis, Simon de Lusignan, B. Jalaludin, AET Yeo, and Amir Talaei-Khoei. 2013. Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: a realist review of the literature. International journal of medical informatics 82, 1 (2013), 10--24.
[13]
Qudamah K. Quboa and Mohamad Saraee. 2013. A state-of-the-art survey on semantic web mining. Intelligent Information Management 5 (2013), 10--17.
[14]
Petar Ristoski and Heiko Paulheim. 2016. Semantic Web in data mining and knowledge discovery: A comprehensive survey. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2016).
[15]
Yongheng Wang and Shenghong Yang. 2010. Outlier detection from massive short documents using domain ontology. In Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 3. IEEE, 558--562.
[16]
Yang Zhang, Nirvana Meratnia, and Paul Havinga. 2010. Outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 12, 2 (2010), 159--170.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Semantics2017: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems
September 2017
202 pages
ISBN:9781450352963
DOI:10.1145/3132218
© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

In-Cooperation

  • St. Pölten University: St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Austria
  • Wolters Kluwer: Wolters Kluwer, Germany
  • Vrije Universeit Amsterdam: Vrije Universeit Amsterdam
  • Semantic Web Company: Semantic Web Company
  • Uinv. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 September 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Knowledge Discovery in Databases
  2. Outlier Detection
  3. Semantic Technologies
  4. Wireless Sensor Network

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

Semantics2017

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 182 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media