skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983823acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Memory-based Recommendations of Entities for Web Search Users

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Modern search engines have evolved from mere document retrieval systems to platforms that assist the users in discovering new information. In this context, entity recommendation systems exploit query log data to proactively provide the users with suggestions of entities (people, movies, places, etc.) from knowledge bases that are relevant for their current information need. Previous works consider the problem of ranking facts and entities related to the user's current query, or focus on specific recommendation domains requiring supervised selection and extraction of features from knowledge bases. In this paper we propose a set of domain-agnostic methods based on nearest neighbors collaborative filtering that exploit query log data to generate entity suggestions, taking into account the user's full search session. Our experimental results on a large dataset from a commercial search engine show that the proposed methods are able to compute relevant entity recommendations outperforming a number of baselines. Finally, we perform an analysis on a cross-domain scenario using different entity types, and conclude that even if knowing the right target domain is important for providing effective recommendations, some inter-domain user interactions are helpful for the task at hand.

References

[1]
E. Amitay, D. Carmel, N. Har'El, S. Ofek-Koifman, A. Soffer, S. Yogev, and N. Golbandi. Social search and discovery using a unified approach. In Proc. of Hypertext 2009, pages 199--208.
[2]
A. Andoni and P. Indyk. Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions. Commun. ACM, 51(1):117--122, 2008.
[3]
A. L. Berger and J. D. Lafferty. Information retrieval as statistical translation. In Proc. of SIGIR 1999, pages 222--229.
[4]
B. Bi, H. Ma, B. P. Hsu, W. Chu, K. Wang, and J. Cho. Learning to recommend related entities to search users. In Proc. of WSDM 2015, pages 139--148.
[5]
R. Blanco, B. B. Cambazoglu, P. Mika, and N. Torzec. Entity recommendations in web search. In Proc. of ISWC 2013, pages 33--48.
[6]
R. Blanco, G. Ottaviano, and E. Meij. Fast and space-efficient entity linking for queries. In Proc. of WSDM 2015, pages 179--188.
[7]
I. Cantador, I. Fernández-Tobías, S. Berkovsky, and P. Cremonesi. Cross-domain recommender systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 919--959. Springer US, 2015.
[8]
B. Carterette, E. Kanoulas, and E. Yilmaz. Simulating simple user behavior for system effectiveness evaluation. In Proc. of CIKM 2011, pages 611--620.
[9]
K. Chakrabarti, V. Ganti, J. Han, and D. Xin. Ranking objects based on relationships. In Proc. of SIGMOD 2006, pages 371--382.
[10]
T. Cheng, X. Yan, and K. C.-C. Chang. Entityrank: Searching entities directly and holistically. In Proc. of VLDB 2007, pages 387--398.
[11]
C. Desrosiers and G. Karypis. A comprehensive survey of neighborhood-based recommendation methods. In Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 107--144. Springer, 2011.
[12]
L. Hollink, P. Mika, and R. Blanco. Web usage mining with semantic analysis. In Proc. of WWW 2013, pages 561--570.
[13]
G. Jeh and J. Widom. Simrank: A measure of structural-context similarity. In Proc. of KDD 2002, pages 538--543.
[14]
Y. Koren, S. C. North, and C. Volinsky. Measuring and extracting proximity graphs in networks. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 1(3), Dec. 2007.
[15]
M. J. Kusner, Y. Sun, N. I. Kolkin, and K. Q. Weinberger. From word embeddings to document distances. In Proc. of ICML 2015, pages 957--966.
[16]
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):76--80, 2003.
[17]
P. Lops, M. de Gemmis, and G. Semeraro. Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. In Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 73--105. Springer, 2011.
[18]
T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proc. of NIPS 2013, pages 3111--3119.
[19]
I. Miliaraki, R. Blanco, and M. Lalmas. From selena gomez to marlon brando: Understanding explorative entity search. In Proc. of WWW 2015, pages 765--775.
[20]
J. Pound, P. Mika, and H. Zaragoza. Ad-hoc object retrieval in the web of data. In Proc. of WWW 2010, pages 771--780.
[21]
K. Radinsky, K. Svore, S. Dumais, J. Teevan, A. Bocharov, and E. Horvitz. Modeling and predicting behavioral dynamics on the web. In Proc. of WWW 2012, pages 599--608.
[22]
B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proc. of WWW 2010, pages 285--295.
[23]
Y. Song, X. Shi, and X. Fu. Evaluating and predicting user engagement change with degraded search relevance. In Proc. of WWW 2013, pages 1213--1224.
[24]
D. Sontag, K. Collins-Thompson, P. N. Bennett, R. W. White, S. T. Dumais, and B. Billerbeck. Probabilistic models for personalizing web search. In Proc. of WSDM 2012, pages 433--442.
[25]
K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In Proc. of WWW 2004, pages 675--684.
[26]
J. Teevan, S. T. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. In Proc. of SIGIR 2005, pages 449--456.
[27]
R. W. White, P. N. Bennett, and S. T. Dumais. Predicting short-term interests using activity-based search context. In Proc. of CIKM 2010, pages 1009--1018.
[28]
R. W. White, W. Chu, A. H. Awadallah, X. He, Y. Song, and H. Wang. Enhancing personalized search by mining and modeling task behavior. In Proc. of WWW 2013, pages 1411--1420.
[29]
B. Xiang, D. Jiang, J. Pei, X. Sun, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware ranking in web search. In Proc. of SIGIR 2010, pages 451--458.
[30]
S. Yogev, H. Roitman, D. Carmel, and N. Zwerdling. Towards expressive exploratory search over entity-relationship data. In Proc. of WWW 2012, pages 83--92.
[31]
X. Yu, H. Ma, B.-J. P. Hsu, and J. Han. On building entity recommender systems using user click log and freebase knowledge. In Proc. of WSDM 2014, pages 263--272.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 2016
2566 pages
ISBN:9781450340731
DOI:10.1145/2983323
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. entity recommendation
  2. recommender systems
  3. web search

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

Conference

CIKM'16
Sponsor:
CIKM'16: ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 24 - 28, 2016
Indiana, Indianapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 701 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media