skip to main content
article
Free access

Is North American IS research different from European IS research?

Published: 01 June 1997 Publication History

Abstract

Diversity, whether in terms of research methodologies or reference disciplines, enriches and benefits a field of research. If, on the other hand, this diversity inhibits the sharing of research and knowledge between communities with different intellectual heritages, loss of synergy and research opportunities for both communities may result. This study identifies similarities and differences between North American and European research in terms of theoretical bases and research methodologies by analyzing doctoral dissertation research. Results show that European MIS research is predominantly qualitative and non-empirical conceptual whereas North American MIS research is predominantly quantitative and empirical. Furthermore, research in Europe is influenced considerably by computer science and artificial intelligence whereas research in North America has more behavioral and managerial roots. A comparison across a five-year period shows that this gap is narrowing.

References

[1]
Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J. (1988). "An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 299-322.
[2]
Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J. (1993). "An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme for IS Research Literature: An Update," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 209-226.
[3]
Bechtel, W., (1988). Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
[4]
Comprehensive Dissertation Index, Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
[5]
Dissertation Abstracts International, Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
[6]
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Ives, B., and Davis, G. (1991). "Supply/Demand of IS Doctorates in the 1990s," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 86-99.
[7]
Devore, J. L., (1982). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
[8]
Evaristo, J. R., Ang S., and Straub, D. W., (1992). "Criteria for High-Quality Information Systems Research: A Comparison of the Views of North American and International Scholars: Technical Note," International Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 99- 105.
[9]
Fitzgerald, G., Hirschheim, R. A., Mumford, E., and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1984). "Information Systems Research Methodology: An Introduction to the Debate," in E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper (Eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 3-9.
[10]
Galliers, R.D., and Land, F.F. (1987). "Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 900-902.
[11]
Hacking, I. (1982). "Language Truth and Reason," in Hollis, M, and Lukes, S. (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[12]
Hamilton, S., Ives, B., and Davis, G. B. (1981). "MIS Dissertations: 1973-1980," MIS Quarterly , Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 61-83.
[13]
Jenkins, A. M., (1984). "Research Methodologies and MIS Research," in E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper (Eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 103-117.
[14]
Klein, H. K. and Lyytinen, K. (1984). "The Poverty of Scientism in Information Systems," in E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper (Eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 131-161.
[15]
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
[16]
Lee, A. S. (1991). "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, November, pp. 342-365.
[17]
Schutz, A., (1973). "Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences," in Maurice Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 1, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 48-66.
[18]
Shim, J. P., English, J. B., and Yoon, J. (1991) "An Examination of Articles in the Eight Leading Management Information Systems Journals: 1980-1988," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 211-219.
[19]
Singleton, R., Jr., Straits, B. C., Straits, M. M., and McAIlister, R. (1988). Approaches to Social Research, New York: Oxford Press.
[20]
Van Horn, R. L., (1973). "Empirical Studies of Management Information Systems," Data Base, Vol. 5, No. 2, 3, 4, pp. 172-180.
[21]
Vogel, D. R. and Wetherbe, J. C., (1984). "MIS Research: A Profile of Leading Journals and Universities," Data Base, Vol. 16, pp. 3-14.
[22]
Walstrom, K., Hardgrave, B. and Wilson, R. (1995). "Forums for Management Information Systems Scholars," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 93-102.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 28, Issue 3
Summer 1997
63 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/272657
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 1997
Published in SIGMIS Volume 28, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MIS research
  2. documentation
  3. measurement
  4. standardization

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)94
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media