skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702227acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

An Experimental Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Dynamic Peephole Navigation

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Dynamic peephole navigation represents a technique for navigating large information spaces in an egocentric way. Studies have shown cognitive benefits for a vertical peephole orientation, when compared to non-egocentric interaction styles. To see how the aspect of canvas orientation effects user performance, we conducted a study (N=16) which revealed that canvas orientation has no significant effect on either navigation performance or spatial memory. We also found a significantly lower physical demand and a higher mental demand in the horizontal orientation. For short-term activities we therefore propose a vertical orientation, while for long-term activities horizontal dynamic peephole navigation is more suitable.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn0548-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video
MP4 File (p1523-muller.mp4)

References

[1]
Fitzmaurice, G.W. Situated information spaces and spatially aware palmtop computers. Communications of the ACM, 1993, 39--49.
[2]
Gustafson, S., Baudisch, P., and Gutwin, C. Wedge: Clutter-Free Visualization of Off-Screen Locations. Proc. of CHI '08, 787--796.
[3]
Kaufmann, B. and Ahlström, D. Studying Spatial Memory and Map Navigation Performance on Projector Phones with Peephole Interaction. Proc. of CHI '13, 3173--3176.
[4]
Mehra, S., Werkhoven, P., and Worring, M. Navigating on Handheld Displays: Dynamic versus Static Peephole Navigation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 4 (2006), 448--457.
[5]
Rädle, R., Jetter, H., Butscher, S., and Reiterer, H. The Effect of Egocentric Body Movements on Users' Navigation Performance and Spatial Memory in Zoomable User Interfaces. Proc. of ITS '13, 23--32.
[6]
Rädle, R., Jetter, H., Müller, J., and Reiterer, H. Bigger is not always better: Display Size, Performance, and Task Load during Peephole Map Navigation. Proc. of CHI '14, 4127--1436.
[7]
Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., and Gutwin, C. Supporting and Exploiting Spatial Memory in User Interfaces. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 6, 1 (2012), 1--84.
[8]
Spindler, M., Martsch, M., and Dachselt, R. Going Beyond the Surface?: Studying Multi-Layer Interaction Above the Tabletop. Proc. of CHI '12, 1277--1286.
[9]
Spindler, M., Schuessler, M., Martsch, M., and Dachselt, R. Pinch - Drag - Flick vs . Spatial Input: Rethinking Zoom & Pan on Mobile Displays. Proc. of CHI '14, 1113--1122.
[10]
Spindler, M., Stellmach, S., and Dachselt, R. PaperLens: Advanced Magic Lens Interaction Above the Tabletop. Proc. of ITS '09, 69--76.
[11]
Yee, K. Peephole Displays: Pen Interaction on Spatially Aware Handheld Computers. Proc. of CHI '03, 1--8.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. An Experimental Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Dynamic Peephole Navigation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2015
    4290 pages
    ISBN:9781450331456
    DOI:10.1145/2702123
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 April 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. canvas orientation
    2. dynamic peephole navigation
    3. navigation performance
    4. spatial memory
    5. subjective workload

    Qualifiers

    • Note

    Conference

    CHI '15
    Sponsor:
    CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 18 - 23, 2015
    Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media